ipl-logo

Activity Self-Assessment Questions

566 Words3 Pages

Activity Self-assessment questions 1. How do courts decide if an agreement is intended to be legally binding? 2. Why should an agreement within a family not be legally binding? 3. Why are the cases of Balfour v Balfour and Merritt v Merritt decided differently? 4. Why should commercial agreements generally lead to a legal relationship? 5. How will businesses try to get round the rules on intention? 6. What is an ‘honour pledge clause’? 7. What is the reasoning behind making freegifts, prizes in competitions etc. part of a legally enforceable agreement? Quick Quiz Consider whether the courts would identify an intention to be legally bound in the following situations: 1. Alan agrees that he will buy his son a book in return for mowing the lawns. …show more content…

Sarah finds two mistakes but Crispin does not pay her. Crispin employs his wife, Katie, as his secretary and to keep his accounts. Crispin promises Katie that he will pay her a £100 bonus if his latest book exceeds 10,000 sales.The book sells 12,000 copies but Crispin does not pay Katie the bonus. A. Sarah has a business arrangement with her father and will be able to sue Crispin for the money. C. Katie will not be able to sue Crispin for the £100 bonus because she is his wife. B. Sarah will not be able to sue her father because she is his daughter. C. Katie will not be able to sue Crispin for the £100 because agreements to pay bonuses are not legally

Show More
Related

R. V. Saulte Ste Case Study

1403 Words | 6 Pages

This essay will be organized by answering the questions in chronological order; to which in the first question, I will be looking heavily into the case of R.v. Saulte Ste. Marie and Roach. It will incorporate the regulatory offences and the mental blameworthiness and how strict liability acts as a balance between the two. It will also include the defence of due diligence.

Read More

Robert Briggs V. Proud Case Summary

910 Words | 4 Pages

Assignment Week 2 Daisy Taylor Business Law May 12, 2016 Professor Goldstein Keller Graduate School of Management   Chapter 14 problem 2 Real property: Robert Briggs v. Winfield and Emma Sackett Statute of Frauds and Equitable Exceptions is a rule enforced by many states concerning certain contracts. The states statutes are virtually uniform in that they require contracts involving interest in land, one year plus, considerations in marriage, more than one year contracts and many other contracts to be in writing. Common sense tells us that any contract that is very important should be in writing. This is important because in case of any breaches in a contract, then there is solid evidence to help in dealing with the issue at hand (Tepper,

Read More

Laws1150 Case Study

822 Words | 4 Pages

Laws1150 Assignment – Contracts There are 4 main issues in this scenario. CHRIS’ ENTITLEMENT TO THE EH HOLDEN i) Did Alina’s email constitute an offer? An offer requires a willingness to be bound by a contract regulated by certain terms. Under the Electronic Transactions Act 2000 (NSW) , s14B (1) specifies that a message conveyed through electronic communication that does not have a specific addressee and or convey an explicit intention to form a binding agreement upon acceptance is an invitation to treat .

Read More

Sherman Anti Trust Act By Harold Evans

1025 Words | 5 Pages

Evans argues that all possible violations of the Anti-Trust Act could be divided into one of two categories: contracts in restraints of trade, and restrictions on competition. By dividing potential cases into these groups and applying different means of measurement, Evans claims one can discern more accurately which side of the legal line each case falls. Evans surmises that, in the case of contracts in restraint of trade, “applying the common law test of reasonableness” (Evans pg. 72) stands as the best means of measuring a contract’s legal validity. This changes when considering restraints on competition, in which Evans claims the “test of extent” (Evans, pg. 72) to be the most accurate means of testing legality. Evans defends his hypothesis by applying this procedure to all the Supreme Court cases between 1890 and 1910.

Read More

How Did Henry Correct In His Claim?

2004 Words | 9 Pages

A) 1. This case is about a contact of sale and purchase. Henry had a written contract for purchasing a guitar. The seller was John. After the terms got written, John orally amended the purchase price.

Read More

Bankruptcy Case: Novelty Now, Inc.

1251 Words | 6 Pages

Personal jurisdiction is the court's power over the parties involved in the case. Subject-matter jurisdiction is when a case is related to a specific subject matter, such as a bankruptcy case can only be held in bankruptcy court. Minimum contacts is appropriate for a court in one state to assert personal jurisdiction over a defendant from another state. Even though Donald Margolin and his company, Donald Margolin Empire Inc., file suit in the state of New York against Novelty Now Inc. and Chris, Matt, and Ian their contract states In the prompt is says; “Novelty Now’s contract with the three men states that all disputes must be brought in the state of Florida.”

Read More

For Husband's Coffee Home Case Study

447 Words | 2 Pages

396-397). Kelsey will enter into a contractual relationship with Shania and Shania will have authority over her as an employer. Kelsey is married to an unbeliever who doesn’t approve of his wife working. He wants her to continue to be a stay-at-home mom for their 13 and 15 year old children. Kelsey’s husband should love her enough to compromise with her work schedule.

Read More

Why Is Australian Consumer Law Unfair

1620 Words | 7 Pages

Introduction The “unfair terms” provisions under Part 2-3 of Schedule 2 of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) (CCA), The Australian Consumer Law (ACL), are necessary to protect consumers and ensure fair trading in Australia. Opponents of the “unfair terms” provision believe that individuals have autonomy to contract and that the inequality of bargaining power between consumers and suppliers is acceptable as contracting parties can renegotiate the terms, accept or reject alternatives, or choose to deal with another provider. These beliefs are based on the outdated falsehood that is classical contract theory. However, this theory allowed the capacity for businesses to use one sided contract terms that can sometimes unfairly and inefficiently

Read More

SRA Code Of Conduct

984 Words | 4 Pages

Also, by trying to act in the best interests of her client, Rafa wrongly called Sara’s office, resulted breaching her legal interest. Then, the principle of maintaining the trust in the provision of legal services was breached since she was unreliable by neglecting to keep the secrets confidential. By uncovering the secrets mean she also broke the trust of the firm towards her. The most serious situation was the call to Sara’s office by saying the discussion to the office’s voicemail while it was confidential. A research shows that every dissatisfied client can lose to the firm nearly 23 clients by communicating the mistakes of solicitors.

Read More

Compare And Contrast The Singularity Of The Scottish Legal System

141 Words | 1 Pages

The singularity of The Scottish Legal System relates to the fact, that although Scotland is part of The United Kingdom of Great Britain (UK) it does have its own distinct legal system with many rules of law that differ from those in the rest of the UK. It should also be noted that in many areas of business law, the law across the UK is the ‘exact same’ or indeed very similar. I.e. In the Sale and Supply of Goods, Consumer Protection, Employment Law, Agency, Partnership and Company Law and Intellectual Property Law. Similarities can be seen within the Law of Contract and Delict, while significant differences are evident in Criminal Law, Property Law, The Law of Trusts and in The Law of Rights in Security, we can see that these differences

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Contract Law

1166 Words | 5 Pages

The modern contract action can be traced to the English common law writs of debt, detinue, and covenant, which were created in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries. The fundamental concern of the law of contracts is the enforcement and promissory obligations, that are determined under the contract. The liability of the conctracts can be formed as an express promise, in which the rules of the contract are fully performed, or through the implied in facts promise, where the acceptance or understanding of the contract is showed according to the acts of the party. A contract is a legally enforceable agreement containing one or more promises.

Read More

The Doctrine Of Privity In The Tweedle V Atkinson Case

951 Words | 4 Pages

By acknowledging right of TPs have in contracts, where benefit is intended to confer on them, The Act helped to limit inconsistency in cases. For example, in Bourne v Mason, TP was allowed to enforce promise in contract, contradicting to Price v. Easton, where plaintiff could not recover. In these cases, even reasoning varied in judgments. Such inconvenience greatly affects the commercial life. Barrister and Law professor Stephen Guest criticized that "…it undermines the social interest of the community in the security of bargains and it is commercially inconvenient" .

Read More

Equity And Rule Of Law: Is Equity More Determinate

894 Words | 4 Pages

However, conflicts arose when the two courts started to overlap with each other. One of the main areas of conflict was in relation to the issue of injunctions and this came to a head in the Earl of Oxford’s Case. In the case, the Common Law justices objected to the Chancellor issuing an injunction in order to prevent

Read More

Good Faith In International Commerce

1594 Words | 7 Pages

It has been related to commercial transactions and exchange of goods and services from the beginning of that time onwards. The term had served as one of Lex Mercatorian in commerce and influenced moral, philosophical and juridical institutions throughout its existence. Both the European contract law and the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts, contains general provisions that entail ‘parties to the commercial contracts in performing their duties or exercising their right to act in accordance with good faith and fair dealing’. The EU member state’s dedication to an integrated internal market gave a tremendous relief when questions arise as to which contract law regulation should be applied in transcontinental trade. In the domain of choice of law rules under the Rome convention entails, ‘The parties to the contract are free to select the governing law, and in the absence of an express choice, the law which is closer to the transaction will be

Read More

Common Law Set Off Essay

1040 Words | 5 Pages

2.1 Introduction In the previous chapter, I discussed the title, purpose and research methodology of this dissertation. The central point of the dissertation surrounds the question whether common law set-off as it relates to credit agreements governed by the NCA, have been superseded by section 90(2)(n) read with section 124B of the NCA. However, before this analysis is undertaken, it is essential to obtain a firm grasp of the general requirements for set-off.

Read More

More about Activity Self-Assessment Questions

Open Document