ipl-logo

Administrative Search Research Paper

668 Words3 Pages

Administrative Search Name: Institution: Over the years the courts have continuously expressed doubt on whether the Fourth Amendment should apply to inspections under administrative search. There are instances where the courts allows authorities to search the property of other or even a person. Often, the Court has held that administrative searches differs from police search in crimes such as; robbery/ burglary, rape, or murder. Accordingly, the Court has imposes different and reduced requirements for administrative searches and in some instances the Court has ruled in favor for warrantless administrative searches. For instance, in Frank v. Maryland the court held that some administrative inspections like fire, health or housing inspections did not require warrants since they were widely accepted by the public. However, Camara v. Municipal Court the ruling held that even an administrative search should conform to the Forth …show more content…

For example, in emergency situations a warranty is not required especially if it involves the seizure of unwholesome food, smallpox vaccinations, health quarantines, or the danger may have significant effect on a large population. Thus, warrantless administrative search kin airports is permissible under the constitution (Weaver, 2013). References Camara v. Mun. Court, 387 U.S. 523 (1967). Fourth Amendment--Administrative Searches and Seizures. (1978). Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Vol 69 (4), 552-562. Frank v. Maryland , 359 U.S. 360 (1959). Terry vs. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968). Thomson Reuters. (2015). Annotation 1 - Fourth Amendment: Search and Seizure. Retrieved from http://constitution.findlaw.com/amendment4/annotation01.html Weaver, R. (2013). Administrative Searches, Technology and Personal Privacy. William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal Volume 22 Issue 2,

Show More
Related
525 Words | 3 Pages

“The court thus appeared to adopt a categorical rule barring the seizure of any contraband detected by an officer through the sense of touch during a patdown search for

Read More
1227 Words | 5 Pages

1. Title and Citation Vance v. Ball State Univ. 570 U.S. ___ (2013)

Read More
579 Words | 3 Pages

Chapter 4 is titled "Criminal Investigatory Search Warrants. " Search warrant laws are found in the Fourth Amendment of the Bill of Rights. The elements of a search warrant include: (1) an order in writing, (2) issued by a proper judicial authority, (3) in the name of the people, (4) directed to a law enforcement officers, (5) commanding the officer to search for certain personal property, and (6) commanding the officer to bring that property before the judicial authority named in the warrant. Neutral judicial officers such as clerks of court, magistrates, complaint justices, judges, and justices of the peace are allowed to issue search warrants in their permitted jurisdictions. They must have probable cause before they can authorize a search warrant, which is usually done through an affidavit submitted by the law

Read More
396 Words | 2 Pages

Warrantless searches and seizures conducted outside the judicial process are per se unreasonable, absent an established exception. (Minnesota v. Dickerson (1993) 508 U.S. 366.) Officers may temporarily detain an individual to conduct an investigatory stop for the purposes of investigating a criminal offense without a warrant. (Terry v. Ohio (1968) 392 U.S. 27.) Nonetheless, a warrantless investigatory stop constitutes a seizure under the Fourth Amendment.

Read More
689 Words | 3 Pages

They decided that the Fourth Amendment does apply to school officials because they act as agents of the State. The reasonableness of a search will determine if it is a legal search. They decided that the original search was legal and the continued search was also legal because they had evidence of criminal

Read More
571 Words | 3 Pages

Every citizen of the United States has their own person right that protects from the governments abusive power. The Bill of Rights was established to ensure the safety of American citizens but not just American citizens some rights are universal for anyone else. Regardless of the Bill of Rights Law enforcement has violated our rights. The constitutional issue has uplifted and many Americans are outraged. Law enforcement should have not have the right to violate people’s rights even though they need to ensure the welfare of all American citizens.

Read More
742 Words | 3 Pages

According to the Fourth Amendment, people have the right to be secure in their private property, and may only be searched with probable cause. However, in a recent case, this right was violated by the government. An Oregon citizen, with the initials of DLK, was suspected of growing marijuana in his home. The federal government used a thermal imager to scan his home, and were later given a warrant to physically search his home. However, many remain divided over whether or not this scan was constitutional, as there was no warrant at the time of the scan.

Read More
1872 Words | 8 Pages

41. Mapp v. Ohio (1961): The Supreme Court ruling that decided that the fourth amendment’s protection against unreasonable searches and seizures must be extended to the states. If there is no probable cause or search warrant issued legally, the evidence found unconstitutionally will be inadmissible in the courtroom and not even considered when pressing charges. The exclusionary rule, in this case, is a right that will restrict the states and not just the federal government, including the states in more of the federal rights as outlined in the Constitution.

Read More
992 Words | 4 Pages

The supreme court voted 6-3 in favor of Mapp. Five justices ruled that the state needed to exclude evidence found without a search warrant. The majority opinion applied the exclusionary rule to the states. The exclusionary rule requires courts to exclude from criminal trials evidence that was accessed in violation of the constitution’s ban on unreasonable searches. The majority opinion was based on many earlier decisions that had started the process of employing federal constitutional protections to state criminal justice systems.

Read More
237 Words | 1 Pages

School officials are not allowed to conduct searches on students without probable cause; and random searches are not permissible according to The Fourth Amendment. The Fourth Amendment states that a person has the right to be secure in their homes, and personal effects and to prevent them against un-probable search cases. For example, these laws and policies affect school leaders decision-making procedures by stating that school leaders must have probable cause to conduct searches against students for specific incidents and locations including any property to be taken from the students. For example, in the case of New Jersey v T. L. O. (1985) addressed the issue of can a search by a school official be called a "search" based on the Fourth Amendment

Read More
463 Words | 2 Pages

Constitution provides, "the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized” ("Fourth Amendment," n.d., para. I). However law enforcement officers are not protected under the Fourth Amendment in regards to search of things such as equipment and lockers due to the nature of the work. The courts have held in People v. Tidwell (1971) that officers have no expectation of privacy that affords or merits protection. This would also apply to seizures of their person as they could also be compelled to appear in line-ups to clear a seizure of their person (Peak et al., 2009, p.

Read More
493 Words | 2 Pages

Ohio (1961), the Supreme Court trusted that the Constitution charged the exclusionary rule as a remaking of a Fourth Amendment infringement. They saw the truths of the sample, the exclusionary rule which was the assurance of somebody 's protection furthermore required by the Due Process which portrayed the Fourteenth Amendment. The rule stated three purposes by the Mapp Court, the right given by the constitution and stated that when police admitted that they were at fault, judges then extended the violations in court. This would stop misconduct for negligence since the case of Mapp the Supreme Court has seized out many exceptions to the exclusionary rule. I would agree with exclusionary rule, searches are easy to get permission from most defendants.

Read More
427 Words | 2 Pages

To begin, we need to understand the fourth amendment. The fourth amendment was created to prevent the government from breaching into our homes and convicting us of crimes based on evidence they discover within our homes. It was vital to state unreasonable searches in the constitution, and an unreasonable search is a search done without

Read More
270 Words | 2 Pages

The fourth amendment states, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” To me, this means, in order for the American people to feel that they and their belongings are safe, only an official sworn into office can issue a warrant. This warrant can also be issued with probable cause, or reasonable belief, that some crime has been committed. Upon issuance of said warrant, the sworn official must specify exactly where police are allowed to search and the exact things or people they are allowed to look for and take in their investigation.

Read More
1030 Words | 5 Pages

Civil liberties are rights guaranteed to citizens in the Constitution that the government cannot interfere with, however, in the name of national security, they do. The government sometimes finds it necessary for Americans to give up some of their basic rights to keep the nation protected, but many people find this unnecessary. A law-abiding citizen’s extremely personal information should not be essential to finding terroristic threats within this society. Under no circumstances should an American citizen’s civil liberties be violated in a time of war or crisis, because those are assured rights that are most valuable to their freedom during national conflicts.

Read More

More about Administrative Search Research Paper

Open Document