ipl-logo

Why Is Admissible Evidence Important

752 Words4 Pages

CHAPTER IV
Admissible evidence in civil proceedings
Any evidence, to be admissible, must be relevant. The rules on evidence contained primarily within Parts 32 and 33 of the Civil Procedure Rules 1998 give the court power to control the evidence brought before it. For example, the court may decide, prior to trial, that a particular issue between the parties is no longer important and can therefore make an order excluding any evidence that the parties intended to use in relation to that particular issue.
There are some exceptions to the rule that any relevant evidence is admissible. This includes:
Opinion evidence
The general rule is that opinion evidence is not admissible, as the function of a witness is to relate the facts to the court so the court can draw its own conclusions. However, there are …show more content…

Evidence is typically introduced to a judge or a jury to prove a point or element in a case.
In criminal law, evidence is used to prove a defendant 's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
However, before evidence can even be used in a criminal case, it must be considered “admissible”. Whether evidence is admissible or not depends on several different factors that the court must analyze. Many different items and statements are often excluded from evidence in a criminal trial because it is considered “inadmissible”.

Hearsay evidence may be admissible in criminal proceedings if it satisfies certain requirements. These are:
• if any statutory provision makes it admissible (e.g. cases where a witness is unavailable);
• if any rule of law preserved by section 118 of the Criminal Justice Act (CJA) 2003 makes it admissible;
• if all parties to the proceedings agree to it being admissible;

Show More
Related
537 Words | 3 Pages

State, 332 Ga. App. 546, 774 S.E.2d 126 (2015) • Generally, if the indictment sets out the offense as done in a particular way, the proof must show it so, or there will be a variance. Martinez v. State, 750 S.E.2d 504 (Ga. Ct. App. 2013). • There is no requirement that the State present testimony that precisely follows the language found in the indictment.

Read More
1031 Words | 5 Pages

This was still introduced as evidence. The prosecution

Read More
567 Words | 3 Pages

Rule 801 states that hearsay is a statement from a declarant that was not made while testifying at the current trial or hearing and a party offers in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted in a statement. Rule 801 has subsections that have hearsay exceptions. These are a declarant-witness's prior statement that is subject to cross-examination and is inconsistent while given under penalty of perjury or is consistent and is used to rebut a charge or is used to identify a person, and an admission by a party opponent. Rule 802 says that hearsay is generally inadmissible unless otherwise noted. Rule 803 states more hearsay exceptions, such as present sense impressions, excited utterances, existing mental, emotional or physical conditions, medical diagnosis or treatments, business records, public records, recorded recollection, reputation concerning character, or statements in treatises.

Read More
888 Words | 4 Pages

2.The impact on the Charter-protected interests of the accused (was the conduct very invasive towards the accused and the protected right). 3.Society's interest in an adjudication of the case on its merits (how substantial is the evidence to Crown’s case). The inclusion of the third factor was deemed important because the Court ruled that exclusion of evidence that led to an acquittal would throw the administration of justice into disrepute in the eyes of the public.

Read More
1242 Words | 5 Pages

The Prosecution presented compelling evidence against Adnan, more robust than the defendant's evidence. Jay's

Read More
1253 Words | 6 Pages

According to law, to identify an individual as a criminal, physical evidence is required. Physical evidence not only determines the criminal, it also assists the detectives, to picture the crime out. Most importantly it supports the accused individual. Unfortunately, things weren’t fair for Adnan because his case was solely based on Jay’s verbal and eyewitness testimony which is most definitely not physical proof. However, even if his testimony was true, there were many suspicious reasons why it was not reliable.

Read More
899 Words | 4 Pages

Given the strong argument by the attorney, the Supreme Court maintained that since the methods used to get the evidence upset the principles of justice, the conviction needed to be reversed. However, it was pointed out that the materials obtained were admissible as evidence (Stewart, 1983). All in all, the appeal was denied by the Supreme Court and the ruling was based on the explanation that the material was obtained from a trunk, which is an inanimate object, rather than forcibly from a

Read More
927 Words | 4 Pages

This shows that evidence is an important role in pleading someone guilty. When you convict someone of a crime, make sure you know the evidence and information on the case before sentencing

Read More
738 Words | 3 Pages

Evidence can be anything that proves or backs up what your argument is about. It helps the reader better understand your argument. In Gay’s essay, she talks about three famous people who come out and announce that they are gay. She proves that famous people cannot have privacy, everything about them will come out to the public even though they want to keep it to themselves.

Read More
476 Words | 2 Pages

Is the evidence relevant? How do I know? The evidence is relevant, I know this from the sweet cry of relief the woman has on seeing the man pack his bags to leave. This is relevant to a violent relationship that has ended finally.

Read More
478 Words | 2 Pages

Today, modern standards require the burden of proof be brought forth by the plaintiff, or prosecution in criminal cases. This means that the accused no longer has to prove they did not commit the crime, but the prosecution has to prove that all the evidence proves the accused did in fact commit the crime in question. Circumstantial evidence is not enough, but physical evidence, or forensic evidence is now required in modern courts for a conviction. Additionally, the modern standard when considering evidence, and for conviction is “beyond a reasonable doubt.”

Read More
819 Words | 4 Pages

Traditionally and legally the burden of proof is on the prosecution because of the established principle that a person is innocent until proven guilty which is the fundamental principle of procedural farness is criminal law. It is considered fundamental because it is believed that it is better to allow an accused to go scot free than punish an innocent. The party who brings the case has the responsibility to produce before the judge all such necessary materials as are required to prove actus reus and mens rea behind a crime. The same is incorporated in section 101 of the evidence act which in its essence says that the person that desires a Court to give judgment as to any legal right or liability dependent on the existence of facts which he

Read More
571 Words | 3 Pages

Prima Facie evidence does not mean that it cannot be deny, it is use to prevent charges being made have no evidence to back it up and waste the time for court and other parties. According Section 173(f), if the judge decide no prima facie case then the defendant will be acquitted because the evidence is not sufficient. Presumption that the defendant are innocent until proven to the

Read More
608 Words | 3 Pages

It can include evidence confined in any document, exhibit or other thing linked with the proceedings. It is not limited to evidence or material arising, found or uncovered after the trial and can contain matters that were available before trial but were simply not known about or exposed. Normally, fresh evidence comprises of something which on the face of it challenges the evidence of a witness, usually but not limited to complainant, but also includes matters such as advances in medical or forensic science . In R v Kai white wind because it could not make the slightest difference the so called fresh evidence did not advance the appellants.

Read More
1373 Words | 6 Pages

This is where the opinions of the judge become relevant. To ascertain the materiality of the facts, one would have to use these as reference. If the judge’s opinion does not explicitly express on which of the facts are material, then generally, all facts in the case are presumed to be material except for those which are obviously not. For example, facts relating to a person, time, place, and amount are insignificant because they will probably not affect the case in any way. Now, if a particular fact is recorded by the reporter, but it is not mentioned in the judge’s opinion, this could one mean one of two things; whether the judge has overlooked the fact to be material or the judge is implying that the fact is indeed immaterial.

Read More

More about Why Is Admissible Evidence Important

Related Topics

Open Document