ipl-logo

Advantages And Disadvantages Of A Unified Government

489 Words2 Pages

The United States Government can be described in two ways. There is unified government, which appears when the President and both houses of congress share the same party. Divided government is the opposite, it occurs when one party controls the white house, and another party controls one or more houses of Congress. A unified government should seem to be more productive because enacting laws would be much easier. A bill has to pass through both houses of congress as well as the president before it can be an official law. When all three of these areas share the same party and same views, laws will be more easily agreed on, thus they will be passed quicker. Also in unified government, filibusters would not be needed. A filibuster is a tactic in the senate which delays an action or bill and ultimately defeats the bill until it is thrown out. In a unified government where the majority of people share the same views, it would be less likely to need to delay bills or throw them out because everyone would already find a way to agree on most of them. However, at the same time, unified government can prove to have disadvantages as the president’s ultimate goal is to be reelected which would mean appealing to the moderates. Therefore, he or she might refuse to pass laws that are too liberal or conservative in order to keep the moderates happy. On the …show more content…

But why wouldn’t they fix that? Gridlock is definitely not productive, but it does force compromise. It also forces members of government to take time and consider both sides of the disagreement. Gridlock also stops the government from making quick decisions. Instead of having legislation just pass bills, gridlock offers more of a challenge to pass bills and a slower process. This slower process lets government slow down and seriously consider the pros and cons of a certain bill, and make a clean

Show More
Related
1144 Words | 5 Pages

When Billy Long campaigns during election season, as a politician, he listens to his constituents as they voice their concern with the issues and policies that are damaging to his district. It is his responsibility to then help the citizens and ensure that he is able to do everything within his jurisdiction to mitigate these very difficulties his constituents face. If he is successful, there are two parties whom benefit. His constituents benefit by having their problems resolved and the less obvious, but perhaps more concentrated benefit goes to Representative Long himself because he is now in a position to claim credit. Passing certain legislation that he promised to his district, gives Billy Long leverage in the next election cycle because he would possess the ability to boast a successful track record and claim credit for bettering the lives of individuals within his district.

Read More
554 Words | 3 Pages

“the 1970s bill was considered by a single committee in each chamber. It came to the House floor as a draft and approved by the committee, and it was considered there under an open rule allowing all germane amendment. The Senate also considered

Read More
932 Words | 4 Pages

This occurs because the minority party can make long speeches to get their point across and develop their points to persuade the majority political parties to vote for a bill they want (Bond,

Read More
1106 Words | 5 Pages

Interactions amid the provinces and the federal government, from constitutional issues to the most irresistible topics bang up-to-date in the country, are indemnified beneath the umbrella of “Federalism”. Authorities are shared so that on some matters, the state governments are decision-holders, whereas on the other matters, national government grasps the autonomy. In last twenty-five years, the upsurge of federal fiats on both governments, local and state, has shifted the power amongst state and national governments. Now, the national government is beginning to have more governance over the state’s engagements.

Read More
1098 Words | 5 Pages

Congressional gridlock is not an uncommon thing in congress. Congressional gridlock happens when there is difficulty passing a law that is trying to satisfy the needs of the people. Gridlock often makes us feel stuck. Neither political party can reach an agreement to enforce a law on an issue, therefore they continue to meet and discuss until a conclusion is made. Gridlock is also referred to as “deadlock” or “political stalemate” because it is almost as if there is nothing either party can do.

Read More
737 Words | 3 Pages

This lead to many of the reforms having limited impact as the party’s desperation to gain votes overshadowed

Read More
338 Words | 2 Pages

This loose alliance of states formed America 's first national government, but the unified government, itself, had only one component, a one-house congress. There was no president, no executive branch, and no separate judiciary system. State legislature

Read More
650 Words | 3 Pages

Thomas Jefferson once said. “There is nothing which I dread so much as a division of the republic into two great parties”. The reason he said this was because he feared a strong central government. Then for some Americans, fears of a strong central government taking advantage came true. This is when the two political parties split.

Read More
1823 Words | 8 Pages

This country was founded with the attempt to separate the federal government and the state government, known as federalism. The goal of federalism is to divide the power of state and federal governments, protect the rights of the state, and prevent tyranny of the majority. Throughout the years, federalism turned into dual federalism where the state and federal government were completely independent of each other and only shared a dependency on the Constitution. The united states suppressing now to cooperative federalism, the national government has assumed even more power, overruling the states with Supreme Court decisions and actions, and executive Orders. Furthermore, the Federal government should grant their state governments more power, due to the connection the state governments hold with their local people.

Read More
1342 Words | 6 Pages

The United States government is best defined as a federal constitutional republic. As a constitutional republic, the U.S. government is organized by the Constitution, setting forth the political threshold of the people, which are known as the federal and state governments. As a federal republic, the control stands by the people throughout the voting process of electing the federal and state officials. The federal government is limited by the distribution of authority within the states as outlined in the Constitution. Although many people like to call the United States a democracy, this is not the case, because the public does not directly control legislation.

Read More
503 Words | 3 Pages

Divided government occurs when one political party controls the presidency and another controls one or both houses of Congress. The struggle between parties can create significant issues for the government, including the appointment of judges and high officials and the creation of effective problem-solving legislation. Divided government creates an issue for the president in making federal appointments. The president has the constitutional power to nominate ambassadors, judges, and high officials, but these nominees are subject to Senate confirmation. When the government is divided the president and the Senate are of different political parties, this creates a problem in the appointment of these positions.

Read More
543 Words | 3 Pages

James Madison wrote Federalist 51 over 200 years ago, yet its words still impact today’s government in 2016. When writing Federalist 51, Madison had two main objectives in mind; he wanted a government with a separation of powers, and he also wanted minorities to be protected. Both of his objectives have been accomplished and continue to be present in today’s American government with the latter objective being more present in today’s government even more so than in the past. To begin with, power is separated in today’s government, preventing a single person or group from having absolute power since, “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely,” according to John Dalberg-Acton. The American government is composed of three branches which power is separated amongst.

Read More
348 Words | 2 Pages

When the party whip makes sure that the members of their party in the House of Commons vote, it almost guarantees that the MPs will vote in the same way. This result is called Party discipline. Party discipline is the ability of a parliamentary group of a political party to vote the same way. If the MPs vote in the same way, it would be unfair for other parties of the House of Commons because some can convince others to vote in a certain way. All they need is more people, which also results in more votes.

Read More
944 Words | 4 Pages

Parliamentarism, or a parliamentary government, is defined “as a system of government in which the executive, the government, is chosen by and is responsible to…the legislature.” (Gerring, Thacker and Moreno, 2005, p. 15) With this form of governmental control, many advantages and disadvantages arise, especially when this system is compared to the likes of ‘Presidential systems’ or even that of ‘Semi-presidential systems’. However, my aim within this essay is to, both, highlight to advantages of parliamentarism, and to also give my opinion as to why this system is better when compared and contrasted with the aforementioned systems. According to Hague and Harrop (2007, p. 336), there are three different branches relating to the parliamentary system. Firstly, the legislature and the executive are “originally linked”.

Read More
1584 Words | 7 Pages

Separation of powers refers to the idea that the major body of a state should be functioned independently and that no individual of a state should have power separately. Therefore, separation of powers means that splitting up of responsibilities into different divisions to limit any one branch from expurgating the functions of another. The intention of the doctrine is to prevent the application of powers and provide for checks and balances of governing a state. It is a doctrine of constitutional law under which the three branches of government, executive power, legislative power, and judicial power are been kept separately to prevent abuse of power.

Read More

More about Advantages And Disadvantages Of A Unified Government

Related Topics

Open Document