ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of The Filibuster

932 Words4 Pages

Filibuster is known as a “the effort by a senator to delay the chamber’s business by making long speeches” (Bond, 726). This tactic is used normally when a senator wants to have a bill be ignored so it won’t pass. They do this by taking all of the available time for the bill by talking or making a speech. Which means that the filibuster is believed to impair with the political process. A lot of people believe it should end while others do not see the harm. This controversial topic has even been the topic for various movies including the 1939 movie, Mr. Smith goes to Washington. With such a great exposure, is it really that bad? The filibuster is something that impairs policy making from occurring. The Senate should eliminate the use of the filibuster completely. This is because the majority parties take advantage of the filibuster. They do this by taking advantage of the cloture rule by using their party members to block presidential nominations. They do this by using the 60 vote requirement to end the filibuster. This means that if the party has enough members they can decide to end the filibuster and vote according to what they want the outcome to be (Liss). When this started to occur Bill Frist came up with the Nuclear Option that would end the filibuster with a simple majority vote …show more content…

It is something most people think when they think about the United States Senate. This is because it allows the senators to work together. This occurs because they can decide to put a bill on the floor and make changes according to what they want (Understanding the Filibuster). This shows the original intend of the filibuster. The original intend of the filibuster was to allow minority parties to be heard. This occurs because the minority party can make long speeches to get their point across and develop their points to persuade the majority political parties to vote for a bill they want (Bond,

Show More
Related

Assignment 2: Unit Four-State Hearing

562 Words | 3 Pages

By means of a cloture vote sixty senators may end discussion and vote on the proposed bill. Without this precaution, a simple majority may pass legislation without considering the opinions of the minority. This is especially dangerous in the United States – a country historically dominated by only two political parties. Since a single political party seldom gains the necessary supermajority of sixty senators needed to move to direct vote, the filibuster ensures that the minority party retains a voice in government.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of The Great Compromise

697 Words | 3 Pages

The main reason why the Framers didn’t succeed in their final compromise is because it was too difficult to make all the delegates (who were basically competing) agree with each other, so numerous issues were ignored and most plans were severely compromised. An example of this is the debate between larger and smaller states over their representation in the newly proposed Senate. Two solutions were significantly favored: the New Jersey Plan and the Virginia Plan. The smaller states were in favor of the New Jersey Plan, which would enforce each state to send the same number of representatives to Congress. The larger states supported the Virginia Plan, which called for each state to have a different number of representatives based on the state’s population.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Congressional Gridlocks

1794 Words | 8 Pages

Then two thirds of the house required to pass a bill which is where our problem lies in voting. A huge problem when it comes to passing laws in the legislative and executive branch is voting one of the greatest problems is when the republican and democratic party are not unified. The concept of having a bicameral

Read More

Comparing The Political Theorists Of Cox, And Mccubbins

1483 Words | 6 Pages

These arguments present different perspectives, however, they do have agreements amongst them. Overall, Mayhew presents an argument that is believable and shows the truth of members of the US Congress. Mayhew speaks about the behavior

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of The US Constitution

238 Words | 1 Pages

Federalists believed the Constitution provided just the right mix of power and limitations. The federalists wanted to make sure the central government either had more or less power. The first government of the US was a one-house legislature with no executive. It couldn't raise money, it relied on the states for military power, and was generally seen as ineffective and weak. The US Constitution was written to remedy those weaknesses and provide the US with a better, more representative form of government.

Read More

Articles Of Confederation Pros And Cons

1266 Words | 6 Pages

The debate for the proposals of the Constitution lasted a long period of time because the States did not agree with the proposals. Compromise was needed in this situation because the Convention would have taken longer than expected. With compromise, the structure of the national legislature was finally formed after months of debates. The plan was adopted: five states agreed, four states disagreed, and two states did not vote. With Rhode Island’s vote, the debates no longer had to to continue.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Gerrymandering

982 Words | 4 Pages

It allows them to use tactics such as packing and cracking which can have a tremendous impact on elections. Packing is when politicians draw out district maps for each party based on population. Packing can swing the vote because the population of one party could out weight the population of the minority party within the same district, causing the entire district to swing with the majority. Voters feel that the other tactic, cracking, gives them a disadvantage because the political parties are being spread out between multiple districts which causes one district to have the majority party in multiple areas (King, Elizabeth). When the politicians of the party in power have drawn out the voters’ map, they maintain power over the lines of the map.

Read More

Citizens United Ruling Summary

417 Words | 2 Pages

It recruits former federal employees to return as lobbyists and consultants. With officials spinning in and out of the public and private sections of society, so does power, certain privileges, and money. This effects the electoral process by changing the way people think. Instead of thinking and acting towards the needs of the people, they focus on the needs of their next employer and disregard the rest.

Read More

How To Abolish The Senate In Canada Essay

344 Words | 2 Pages

Canada has two legislative bodies in the parliamentary system, one is the Senate of Canada which is constituted by the appointed members. Secondly, is the House of Commons, which is made up of elected officials. The Senate is consisted of 105 members that are recommended by the Prime Minister and the appointed by the Governor General. The members of the Senate can be made up of business people, lawyers, doctors, hockey players, and many more, because of the variety of experience from the individuals of senators gives a better understanding of the people they represent and of the problems that Parliament must try to solve.

Read More

Should Congress Have Term Limits Essay

411 Words | 2 Pages

There are many differing views on the powers congress holds, and congress itself, one such point of view is on whether or not congressmen should have a limited number of terms they are capable of serving, similar to how the president is only capable of serving two terms, and whether or not it would benefit both the people and the government. Congress itself is the legislative branch of the federal government, and as such holds a large amount of authority and power, including putting laws into effect, declaring war, taxing, impeachment, and many other important duties that can be carries out only by congress. Furthermore, members of congress do not have limits on the amount of terms they are allowed to serve, only limits on the length of each term, for those in the house of representatives each term is two years, while in the senate, each term is six years long. I find this to be a matter of public concern because many

Read More

Argumentative Essay: We Should Keep The Senate In Canada

875 Words | 4 Pages

All over Canada, Canadians have different views as for what should we do about the Senate .Yes, the Senate has some important qualities but what we do not need the Senate for today is one of its original purposes, to represent the interests of the provinces in the federal legislative policy process. For example, people like “Ralph Goodale, who fought hard for Saskatchewan’s interest around the Cabinet table for more than a dozen years. John Baird, the regional minister for Eastern Ontario today,”(Eugene Lang) is a current equivalent. The provincial interest is taken care of by regional ministers in a way that no senator or group of senators could hope to

Read More

Bipartisanship Essay

550 Words | 3 Pages

Bipartisanship is crucial to passing effective legislation. When both party disagree with each other gridlock occurs. This gridlock forces both sides to stonewall the other to get a bill passed that is lopped sided favoring one party over the other. Bipartisanship allows all voices to be heard which creates a bill that congress can pass that represents the greater good of the country rather than one party’s constituency. With bipartisanship congress works smoother and is favored by the country with positive rating.

Read More

Compare And Contrast Senate And House Of Representatives

545 Words | 3 Pages

The founders wanted the Senate to view the impact of their decisions at a national level. They wanted the senate to take a methodical approach to voting. Members of the senate remain in office on six-year terms, much longer then their House of Representative counter parts. The idea behind a six-year term is to provide a form of barrier from the people; this allowed the senate to make long-term decisions rather then, what is developing now. Members of the Senate are also required to be a minimum 30 years of age, as opposed to the 25 years of age for House members.

Read More

Argumentative Essay On Filibusters

1586 Words | 7 Pages

The minority starts a filibuster by extending a debate or by making long speeches, which usually takes hours. Senators treat filibusters as bargaining chips to negotiate with the majority, which dominates the Senate with more senators elected. Because “the Senate has no Rules Committee and instead determines the length and structure of its debates by unanimous consent agreement” (English 109), the definition of filibuster varies. It usually depends on the context of debates between parties on specific bills. Senators can regard any speeches delivered by the opposition as filibusters, if they believe that those speeches are intended to delay the voting of a bill.

Read More

Essay On Divided Government

503 Words | 3 Pages

Attempting to enact significant legislation requires Congress and the White House to compromise and anticipate what others will approve of and pass. When a bill successfully passes both houses of Congress, which has become increasingly difficult due to party polarization and radical groups within the House of Representatives and the Senate, it then goes to the president for signing. This is a lengthy process, and in order for groups of people with opposing views to settle in agreement on a measure, a great deal of negotiation is often required. This can result in a piece of legislation that is a compromised, diluted version of its original form that is not an effective solution to the initial problem. Vague, weak legislation often necessitates further action by the other two branches of government in order to interpret and execute it properly.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of The Filibuster

Related Topics

Open Document