ipl-logo

How To Abolish The Senate In Canada Essay

344 Words2 Pages

Canada has two legislative bodies in the parliamentary system, one is the Senate of Canada which is constituted by the appointed members. Secondly, is the House of Commons, which is made up of elected officials. The Senate is consisted of 105 members that are recommended by the Prime Minister and the appointed by the Governor General. The members of the Senate can be made up of business people, lawyers, doctors, hockey players, and many more, because of the variety of experience from the individuals of senators gives a better understanding of the people they represent and of the problems that Parliament must try to solve.
The functions of the Senate is to cautiously examine legislation that are proposed by the House of Commons, to suggest changes or adjustments. The Senate can reject a bill, and recommend changes and improvements to be made. They can introduce new bills however, most bills are introduced by the House of Commons. A bill cannot become a law in Canada without the Senates approval. This is also the only reason that the Senate is a useful institution in Canada today as it represents the interest of the provinces in federal legislative. Many Canadians want the either reform or abolish …show more content…

However, abolishing the Senate may not be the best for Canada in the end, so another argument is to reform the Senate. The best plan at the moment to reform the Senate is the Triple E plan, as it would make it so that the Senators are elected, each province is represented equally, making the Senate more effective. If we were to abolish the Senate the only way to do so would be by a constitutional amendment backed by at least seven provinces representing 50 per cent of the population, or one with unanimous provincial

Show More
Related
510 Words | 3 Pages

The Queensland upper house, known as the Queensland Legislative Council, was eradicated in 1922. Arguably, the abolishment of this upper house, and the introduction of a unicameral system in Queensland placed a severe limitation on democratic credentials of the Queensland government (Aroney 2008, 39). With this, the reinstatement of an upper house in Queensland may hold the key to enhancing accountability and stability of the Queensland government whilst preventing dictatorship. Queensland remains the only state in Australia without an upper house and as a result the only state that is operated with a unicameral system, the disadvantages of such a system is copious.

Read More
1949 Words | 8 Pages

The Senate in Canada should be abolished Introduction: Canada senate is a part of legislation institution in Canada, which represents the interests of upper class people. Different from America, it is not produced by election but directly-nominated by the premier and appointed by governor. Senate, governor, and the House of Commons are like three legs of a tripod which constitute the congress and legislation system in Canada. Senate undertakes the responsibility of proposing expostulation to governor and cabinet, which acts the role of supervision and restriction. Senate played critical role when Canada established federal government in 1867, the diversity of senators warrants the smooth convey of popular will to governors and legislators coming from different ethnic group and social status.

Read More
504 Words | 3 Pages

The founding father’s idea when they created the Constitution was to prevent a centralized government. As expressed by James Madison in Federalist No. 51, they believe that the power surrendered by people would be divided between the federal and state governments, creating balance of power that would enable both governments to control each other. Over time, the balance of power between the federal and state governments has shifted in favor of the federal government and this has taken place with the help of the Constitution and by enactments of Congress. The role that Chief Justice John Marshall played in defining the power of the federal and state governments during the early 19th century is important to mention because he shaped the nation.

Read More
564 Words | 3 Pages

The monarchy in Canada is a continuous debate among the politicians and individuals. This paper aims to present the advantages and disadvantages of the monarchy in Canada. This way will enable us to take a clear position. First, Canadian politics are known for their divisive attitudes, and it is very hard to get consensus on decisions. The Queen plays the role of reference for the Canadian politicians and their decisions.

Read More
712 Words | 3 Pages

Nancy Zhou Social 11A Mr. B September, 17th, 2017 Q: Should Canada keep, change or abolish the senate? The Reason Canada Need to Change the Senate Canada should change the Senate because the senate is useless, undemocratic and costly today. However, the principle of Senate is a good idea, so it is still needed and important. The Senate is a legislative body of the government, which has the almost the same power as the House of Common.

Read More
864 Words | 4 Pages

As the monarchy has existed in Canada for a long time, it is undeniable that even that has been part of many people’s identity and getting rid of this is the same as getting rid of a part of someone’s identity. During the process of removing the monarchy it is not a surprise that Canadians who support the monarchy would even protest so that the monarchy will not get abolished which would be chaotic. On the other hand, although many Canadians do not favour the monarchy, they do not have any protest going on at the moment which shows that changing the type of Canada’s government is not a top priority for many Canadians so it is better to just leave Canada's current government as it is. There are many polls conducted by many companies and there is a survey which majority of its respondents believed that the Constitutional Monarchy is indeed part and define Canadians in different aspects: “A majority (55%) agrees…that the constitutional monarchy helps to define Canadian identity and should continue to be our form of government, unchanged from 2021” (“Canadians Conflicted on Future Role of Monarchy,” 2022). This quote helps support the idea of the monarchy as being part of many Canadians’ identity and culture and abolishing it for no strong reason is more of a loss not only to Canada but to its people as well.

Read More
1844 Words | 8 Pages

The 1979 Pepin- Robarts Commission and 1980 Quebec Liberal Beige Paper argued for increased representation of regional interests in the federal levels of government though the use of appointed Senators by provincial governments. (Stilborn 1992, pg. 31) Provincially appointed Senators would have allowed the provinces to influence federal actions that impact provincial areas. The original idea for the Senate was to offer a second opinion to bills that the House of Commons passed. With having provincial appointed Senators, it would cause the Senate to move away from representing Canada on a whole to being more focused on representing Canadians on a provincial basis. Another reform proposal was the idea of having term limits, as done in the United States of America.

Read More
1686 Words | 7 Pages

There is simply no good reason to allow a leader to prolong the inevitable collapse of their government. It could be reasonably contended that if this reform was put into place, a two-thirds opposition government could use prorogation to their partisan advantage. Though incredibly unlikely, this is a phenomenon that could occur, and so it must be addressed. Only one collation government has ever existed at a federal level is post-confederation Canada. This combined with the sheer unlikelihood of an opposition gaining two-thirds of the seats discredits the arguments merit.

Read More
875 Words | 4 Pages

The Senate is responsible for protecting the rights and interests of Canadians in all of its regions, especially minority groups or people who do not often get a chance to present their opinions to Parliament. Before a bill can become law, it goes through three stages, called "readings," in both Houses. The bill is debated, adjusted and then voted on by each House. Once approved, the bill is presented to the Governor General for royal assent and is made law. Another role of the Senate, not plainly provided for in the Constitution, “is to act as a non-ideological, routine revising chamber that picks up flaws in legislation that have avoided notice during a bill’s passage through the House of Commons.”

Read More
545 Words | 3 Pages

The Senate and House of Representatives comprise the two chambers of the United States Congress. While both houses are representative bodies and jointly oversee the executive branch, both must approve all bills before the president, but both chambers have different roles according to the Constitution. The House of Representatives has 435 members apportioned to the house from across the United States. States with larger populations receive more seats within the house.

Read More
436 Words | 2 Pages

Instead, the money spent on the Senate could be used to improve the Lower House of Canada’s Parliament. To summarize, the predominant reason why the Senate should be abolished is because their work is not worth how much it costs. The Senate rarely defeats

Read More
1219 Words | 5 Pages

This corrupt system as some refer to it has many people confused and wondering what benefits are for Canadians. A specific case of the Charter being ineffective is the case Arsenault-Cameron v. Prince Edward

Read More
1343 Words | 6 Pages

They scrutinise any laws being made, by questioning the Government, debating issues and policy. We can see there is an issue over the Lords questioning the decision to make £4.4b cuts. This is after the Conservatives promised not to cut the tax credits, Labour peer Baroness Hollis of Heigham said, “Those families believed us… believed the Prime Minister when he promised tax credits… would not be cut.” The House of Lords in this particular situation is looking out for the public’s best interests, making sure the Government doesn’t go against what they had promised and stood for. As if the House of Lords was to be reformed in such a way that would give the House of Commons more control.

Read More
754 Words | 4 Pages

Abi H. Civic Reflection Issue 1- Change in Point of View: In Canada, voter turnout has become a major issue; as there is a large amount of the population that does not vote in elections. Back in 2008, a total of 58% of the countries` population voted in the election. This is a startling low number, which since has begun to increase only slightly in recent years. In a democratic society, voting is essential for it to function with its full potential. Doing so enacts one of your basic responsibilities as a citizen, as well as shows that you are staying involved in your community and government.

Read More
944 Words | 4 Pages

Secondly, the parliamentary executives, the cabinet minister and the Prime Minister, share responsibilities. Therefore, the parliament is “jointly responsible for the actions of the government…primus inter pares (first among equals)”. (Haywood, 2007, p. 95) Lastly, a typical feature of the parliamentary system is that the offices of the Head of State and the Head of the Government remain separate from each other. Union is a key feature of the parliamentary governments worldwide.

Read More

More about How To Abolish The Senate In Canada Essay

Related Topics

Open Document