The monarchy in Canada is a continuous debate among the politicians and individuals. This paper aims to present the advantages and disadvantages of the monarchy in Canada. This way will enable us to take a clear position. First, Canadian politics are known for their divisive attitudes, and it is very hard to get consensus on decisions. The Queen plays the role of reference for the Canadian politicians and their decisions. The founding fathers of Canada when they put down the agreement of the Confederation did not envisage many cases such as the power of controlling the water sources. There are many differences over the ruling power between the federal government and the provinces, which makes the role of the queen critical in ruling between them (Salter & Hebert, 2014).
The second role of the Queen in Canada is leading the crown institutions whose job does not depend on the parties at power, the RCMP, and the Central Bank of Canada are examples of these institutions that are supervised by the Queen and their leaders are nominated by
…show more content…
So, the Supreme Court whose missions and its neutrality are ensured by the Queen play a major role in providing the balance within Canadian politics. The Queen also is the chief commander of the Canadian forces, and it assumes different other functions as the head of the state. While assuming all these responsibilities, the Queen does not and never receive any financial rewards for her work. The Queen does not own any properties in Canada that need to be maintained and guarded. So, the British Patriation in Canada does not cost anything, and even the visits of the Queen to Canada are just as costly as the visits of any other head of state to Canada (Salter & Hebert,