ipl-logo

Essay On Why Canada Should Remain A Constitutional Monarchy

864 Words4 Pages

Canada should remain a Constitutional Monarchy for multiple reasons.
Three of many reasons are: the impossibility of it being abolished, the monarchy being part of many Canadians’ lives, and how Canada's government works well even with the monarchy.
To begin with, Canada should remain a Constitutional Monarchy because of how impossible it is to be abolished. There have been many people who wanted to abolish the monarchy but might not have thought whether it is possible or not. Abolishing the monarchy is not a simple act, there are many requirements needed to abolish it such as: unanimous consent of all 10 provinces, Canada’s approval from the House of Commons and Canada’s approval from the Senate. Just with the requirements needed to get …show more content…

Errol Mendes” (Gallant). This statement supports the fact that even in the first step of abolishing the monarchy which is the requirements, it would have been difficult and nearly impossible to achieve. Furthermore, since the treaty rights of Indigenous People flows from treaties with the crown, a consultation with the Indigenous People regarding this issue is a must and almost required if the treaty reconciliation is to be taken seriously. In order to get rid of this institution they would certainly have to consult the Indigenous People because otherwise it will most likely not be approved: “[According to an associate professor of international affairs at Carleton University, Prof. Lagasse]…it’s not a strict requirement, but I could easily see the Supreme Court of Canada saying you can’t get rid of this institution without their involvement” (Gallant). This quote argues how necessary it is to …show more content…

As the monarchy has existed in Canada for a long time, it is undeniable that even that has been part of many people’s identity and getting rid of this is the same as getting rid of a part of someone’s identity. During the process of removing the monarchy it is not a surprise that Canadians who support the monarchy would even protest so that the monarchy will not get abolished which would be chaotic. On the other hand, although many Canadians do not favour the monarchy, they do not have any protest going on at the moment which shows that changing the type of Canada’s government is not a top priority for many Canadians so it is better to just leave Canada's current government as it is. There are many polls conducted by many companies and there is a survey which majority of its respondents believed that the Constitutional Monarchy is indeed part and define Canadians in different aspects: “A majority (55%) agrees…that the constitutional monarchy helps to define Canadian identity and should continue to be our form of government, unchanged from 2021” (“Canadians Conflicted on Future Role of Monarchy,” 2022). This quote helps support the idea of the monarchy as being part of many Canadians’ identity and culture and abolishing it for no strong reason is more of a loss not only to Canada but to its people as well. Therefore, the monarchy is part of many Canadians’ lives as

Show More
Related
1949 Words | 8 Pages

The Senate in Canada should be abolished Introduction: Canada senate is a part of legislation institution in Canada, which represents the interests of upper class people. Different from America, it is not produced by election but directly-nominated by the premier and appointed by governor. Senate, governor, and the House of Commons are like three legs of a tripod which constitute the congress and legislation system in Canada. Senate undertakes the responsibility of proposing expostulation to governor and cabinet, which acts the role of supervision and restriction. Senate played critical role when Canada established federal government in 1867, the diversity of senators warrants the smooth convey of popular will to governors and legislators coming from different ethnic group and social status.

Read More
1032 Words | 5 Pages

Introduction The Canadian Senate has been an institution of the country since the multiple negotiations that made possible the establishment of the federation. Section 17 of CA 1867 states that Canada is to have a Parliament comprising a House of Commons (lower house), a Senate (upper house), and the Crown. However, from the parliamentary institutions aforementioned, only the elected members of the House of Commons could claim to have a democratic mandate: the position of the Crown is hereditary, and the governor general that represents it, as well as senators, are appointed (Malcolmson et al. 2021). The. Despite Canadians’ general dissatisfaction with the Senate and ongoing criticism around its undemocratic model, patronage appointments and

Read More
1178 Words | 5 Pages

Throughout Canada’s history with numerous Prime Ministers, many would argue that William Lyon Mackenzie King was the best one. To be a good Prime Minister, one must be able to connect with the people that they are in charge of and they need to have a good understanding of different cultures in the society at hand. Throughout the course of King’s reign as Prime Minister over Canada, he made significant impacts upon numerous aspects for the country. He was a successful Prime Minister because his accomplishments during his debut as Prime Minister, his steps in Canadian autonomy and conscription, his determination over his political career, relations within the country, and finally his initiative in spending numerous efforts into accomplish

Read More
564 Words | 3 Pages

The monarchy in Canada is a continuous debate among the politicians and individuals. This paper aims to present the advantages and disadvantages of the monarchy in Canada. This way will enable us to take a clear position. First, Canadian politics are known for their divisive attitudes, and it is very hard to get consensus on decisions. The Queen plays the role of reference for the Canadian politicians and their decisions.

Read More
712 Words | 3 Pages

Nancy Zhou Social 11A Mr. B September, 17th, 2017 Q: Should Canada keep, change or abolish the senate? The Reason Canada Need to Change the Senate Canada should change the Senate because the senate is useless, undemocratic and costly today. However, the principle of Senate is a good idea, so it is still needed and important. The Senate is a legislative body of the government, which has the almost the same power as the House of Common.

Read More
785 Words | 4 Pages

That is why absolute monarchy is a negative system, as the government begins to care more about power and not their fellow ones. As said before, absolute monarchy is a bad way to rule a country, and Charles I can give us an example why. His reign was made of only his decisions, and no one could say the contrary. He could raise taxes, and imprison

Read More
1574 Words | 7 Pages

For a long time the debates had been going about how was the better prime minister of Canada. On the the top of most lists of best prime ministers are Mackenzie King and Sir John A. Macdonald. For example, according to the Expert Survey that was made in 2013 “Laurier came first, Macdonald second, and King third, but the difference in their overall scores was negligible”. Both prime ministers had a strong vision of the country that helped shaped Canada to become the country it is today(in 2015). Thesis: Sir John A.Macdonald was one of the founding fathers, but William Lyon Mackenzie King had to lead the country through the part of Depression and WWII, and they both have made different positive contributions to Canada and are highly respected

Read More
1054 Words | 5 Pages

William Lyon Mackenzie King, a man of glory, forever changed Canada’s constitution during the tumultuous nineteenth century and resolved all difficulties Canada faced on its way to becoming a strong, independent, and autonomous nation. His contributions and sanctions targeted all factors at the time and had interrelated effects on the construction of Canada. Unlike other Canadian politicians, King handled every crisis with thorough planning and achieved promising outcomes from unsolvable problems. It is without a doubt that King was the most influential figure in Canada’s development. His role in the autonomy, economic development, and social stability stands as solid evidence of the pioneering impacts he had on Canada’s advancement.

Read More
521 Words | 3 Pages

In addition to the rights it already has, the Canadian Charter also has a number of certain group rights. These rights include linguistic and cultural rights for the French Canadian part of the Canadian populations in places of Quebec and New Brunswick, some other rights that are included as well are rights for aboriginal groups. The concept of rights in this group of rights doesn’t really have any recognition to US law where it got them from. Unlike The U.S constitution, the Canadian constitution gives most of the power to its Queen, which gives her more power of everything, while the U.S divides the power as to not give anyone too much authority over some things. While Canada does have a distribution of legislative power, it's not as much of a distribution like the U.S constitution has since Canada has a queen.

Read More
1067 Words | 5 Pages

England government was not designed to protect subjects from tyranny through their balance constitutional system of checks and balances. In reality, their checks and balance system was restrictive because parliament could check the kings authorities. To give someone absolute power is a corruption waiting to happen, what was which Thomas Paine had realized. The composition of monarchy first excludes a man from the means of information, yet empowers him to act in cases where the highest of judgment is required. This factor will shut the common man out from the world.

Read More
783 Words | 4 Pages

When Prime Minister Wilfrid Laurier stated, “As the 19th century was that of the United States, so I think the 20th century shall be filled by Canada”, the decades that followed provided his statement to be true as Canada became an independent and strong nation. The battlefields in World War One were a defining moment for Canada as their forces fought as one nation for the first time, instead of under British Command. Also, at the end of the war, Canada was recognized at the Peace Conference and signed the Treaty of Versailles as an independent country. In addition, Canada joined the League of Nations, playing a major role in world politics. These events in the early 20th century allowed the beginning of a strong nation with a growing national

Read More
1219 Words | 5 Pages

This corrupt system as some refer to it has many people confused and wondering what benefits are for Canadians. A specific case of the Charter being ineffective is the case Arsenault-Cameron v. Prince Edward

Read More
1332 Words | 6 Pages

The Confederation gave the state governments power. Another political reason can be how the British didn’t want to be involved in their colonies' government. The Confederation was made because of the fear of American expansion, and then taking over Canada. Many examples can prove this like of how the Red River settlement (Manitoba) was pressured into creation due to the strong presence of the USA. This was mainly due to trade and the railway problems.

Read More
1033 Words | 5 Pages

The events in American history have also affected Canada from a political perspective, which lead to the Democracy that is present today. Another way the U.S. has affected Canada is from a military perspective because Americans are quick to jump to war and Canada has had to help control them which lead to them being peacekeepers. The United States helped mold the Canadian identity by being both a threat and support to the nation; this will continue into the 21st century but Canada will keep it’s unique identity. A country 's culture can be seen as interchangeable with identity; in Canada there is evidence of American culture everywhere.

Read More
1421 Words | 6 Pages

4.2 The Power and Influence of the Crown Since long, the Monarch in the United Kingdom had a great and powerful power and led their Kingdom into greatness. The idea of modern Parliament in United Kingdom can be traced back to the Anglo-Saxon era, yet it was only in the 13th century that these forms take shape. As a monarchical system, the Monarch had always relied on the advice of the assembled of the King’s or Queen’s most powerful subjects, wither lords, bishops, and abbots. Then by the late 17th century, the power of the Monarch was declining and the House of Commons gained more favors. Then, the end of the Second World War limited the power and influence of the Monarch.

Read More

More about Essay On Why Canada Should Remain A Constitutional Monarchy

Related Topics

Open Document