ipl-logo

Overview Of The National Health Insurance Model

2078 Words9 Pages

The National Health Insurance model:
Since both of the above mentioned models is so widely implemented and successful in their own way, there is a third model which is “the best of both worlds”. This is called the National Health Insurance Model. In this model the private sector pays premiums into a government insurance fund which in turn uses private health insurance providers. Doctors and other staff members’ salaries are determined and paid by the government which leads to patients not having to pay for any basic medical services. The government maintain control in such a system by limiting the medical services they will provide free of charge or by making patients wait to be treated. This means that additional, non-basic medical needs will not be covered by the government, but the consumer will be responsible for the expense.
This model is implemented in Canada, as well as in Taiwan and South Korea and is also the model that South Africa would like to implement by 2025/26. For this to be made possible, South Africa’s government would need additional funds, as it is already in a deficit. …show more content…

The question would then rather be if the portion of the NHI Model of the government is affordable. South Africa is still reporting a deficit in the budget, which means there are no surplus funds and any additional expenditure needed for the NHI project would need to be raised. South Africa is currently spending 11% of its budget on health, this is about R168.4 billion (South African Revenue Services, 2016), but on average will need an additional R10.4 billion per annum (KPMG, 2013) to fund the

Show More
Related
902 Words | 4 Pages

If I lived in a country like this I couldn’t help but be anything besides disappointed. I think that many people feel this way and that’s why many mission trips with future health professionals are taken to developing countries. They try to provide what medical care they can in a nice and ordinary way. Why this Out-of-Pocket model seems so terrible, it is still incorporated into the United States today. Will it ever go away in the United

Read More
1605 Words | 7 Pages

In addition to the dismay of many healthcare professionals, patients, and citizens who are uninsured, several flaws about the current healthcare system show the necessity for reform. The three flaws that exacerbate the current healthcare crisis are: the tax code and tax breaks, the lack of preventable care and adequate care of chronic diseases, and administrative costs. A single payer, universal healthcare system can resolve the major flaws of the

Read More
777 Words | 4 Pages

Some detractors of a single payer health care system immediately point to the burdensome cost which would be placed on the average citizen in order to pay for such a system; however, A single payer health care system would be a manageable cost and would save most Americans money. One single payer critic made the claim that Single payer would be impossible because of the financial hit that it would require the U.S. to take, therefore making the very proposal of a single payer health system a politically toxic proposal that would lead to the souring of the electorate(McArdle n. pag). While Miss McArdle isn’t wrong in the fact that any single payer system would cost a considerable amount of money, she is mistaken in thinking that it would be

Read More
1446 Words | 6 Pages

It summarize that the unhealthy people and people of lower income status would use the public option to meet basic needs, while healthy people would remain on the plan because the private healthcare plan would have better benefits than the public one. “At equilibrium, the public insurer will choose to cover the less healthy group of consumers, leaving the healthier, more promotable section of the market to the private insurer. Consequently, the private insurance plan generates a substantially positive profit, and the public plan runs at a balanced budget.” (Barbos & Deng 2013 p.d. 23). A public option would meet the wants of certain people and go there, causing a decrease demand of private ones, but again more profit for the private firms.

Read More
1153 Words | 5 Pages

With taxes from healthcare slowly creeping into one’s income, a person under government healthcare is essentially paying the same, if not more, than a person under independent healthcare (Peikoff). Whether it is the scary policies in the PPACA or the destruction of market drive through government handouts, government healthcare is not the best route for the US. A free-market system provides much more advantages than a government system. A free-market system also puts more freedom in the hands of a consumer.

Read More
1611 Words | 7 Pages

A country's healthcare system is essential to its population, preventing diseases and improving the overall health of its people. Many countries have different forms of healthcare that are available to their citizens. Depending on the country, the form of healthcare can be unobtainable or ineffective. While some countries are able to provide high-quality, accessible healthcare, not everyone is given the same opportunity. When examining the healthcare systems of the United States and Canada, it is interesting to note how their healthcare systems have qualities that intersect and diverge from one another.

Read More
1318 Words | 6 Pages

The United States no longer posses the ability to effectively drive down premium costs through the means of insuring healthy people. For example there is a town with ten houses, and, on average, one house a year burns down. If no one in the town pays for insurance they have a 10% chance of their house burning down each year. If everyone in the town pays insurance they spread the risk because no matter whose house burns down no one will have to pay anything as the insurance company will cover the cost of the house that burns down each year and make a slight profit. This is the same logic applied to the whole medical insurance market.

Read More
1146 Words | 5 Pages

For us here in the United States, the focus will be on setting minimum standards across the nation without limiting individuals from buying higher coverage if that is their preference. In addition, individuals and families will be getting higher coverage, better access to treatment and quality health care. The beauty of this plan is that it works; many nations that use the single payer system with an explicit national health program allow individuals to purchase additional insurance or care using their own resources (Gruber, 2009). Unfortunately, the system in the United States does not quite work like that; many individuals are left in the lurch because there is no minimum standard that is acceptable across the board (Gruber, 2009). We have several extremes here in the States; one extreme is that millions of Americans have only subsidized health care coverage, another extreme is the

Read More
729 Words | 3 Pages

Continuing with the status quo will only cause more expenditures to be added causing a fall in our economy and tax increases for Americans, overall (Cicconi & Strug, 2010). However, on that same note a single-payer system would not be the most preferred option due to the fact that Regional Health Authorities (RHA) and Family Practitioner Committees (FPC) can just play hot potato with patients’ bills. The RHA is responsible for divvying out the budget to hospitals that are located in their area and outside of their area is the FPC with is responsible for remunerating general practitioners, dentists, and pharmacists. Thus patients that don’t fit into the borders of these guidelines get shifted around from the GP to the hospital, to the community, and then back to the hospital again. The government would be able to shift costs with a single payer system onto social security in the case of elderly patients often times sending them to nursing homes.

Read More
900 Words | 4 Pages

In general, healthcare is from private insurance companies, however, we also give government healthcare to people in need through systems like Medicare. America’s current mixed system is a better fit for the United States because of its greater efficiency and lower cost. A mixed system of healthcare is more beneficial for America than a Universal Healthcare system would be due to its substantial

Read More
1136 Words | 5 Pages

One of these countries that have a single-payer health care system is Canada; who spends half as much per capita on health care as the U.S (“Right to Health Care”, ProCon. Org). Canada isn’t the only country that manages to spend less of their GDP on health care than what the United States uses from theirs. Not only do these countries spend less money than the U.S, but they also perform better than them in the medical department according to the standard public-health

Read More
727 Words | 3 Pages

Health care should not be considered a political argument in America; it is a matter of basic human rights. Something that many people seem to forget is that the US is the only industrialized western nation that lacks a universal health care system. The National Health Care Disparities Report, as well as author and health care worker Nicholas Conley and Physicians for a National Health Program (PNHP), strongly suggest that the US needs a universal health care system. The most secure solution for many problems in America, such as wasted spending on a flawed non-universal health care system and 46.8 million Americans being uninsured, is to organize a national health care program in the US that covers all citizens for medical necessities.

Read More
928 Words | 4 Pages

Public health insurance assures that, since it decreases the gap between social levels as there is no discrimination between rich and poor. According to article (12) in the library of human rights session number (22) “it's the right for every citizen to enjoy the luxury health and receive the highest medication”. Public hospitals provide that by making its number one aim to treat the patient and make sure that the patient has received proper medication without caring about what payments will be paid and what luxuries will be provided according to the paid amount. “The right of each citizen to have an appropriate acces to health care should be based on their needs and not on their ability to pay costs for such care” confirmed by the paper of health and population provided in the eighth national

Read More
1035 Words | 5 Pages

A demographic Transition Model consists of birth rate and death rate, which is two demographic characteristics on historical population trends. Demographic transition models have 4 stages and possibly a stage 5 on occasion. Stage 1 is the High Fluctuating stage, Stage 2 is the Early Expanding, Stage 3 is the Late Expanding and Stage 4 is the Low Fluctuating, and the last stage that is only occasionally used is the Stage 5 the Declining stage. Birth and death rates vary due to the developed and developing countries. Developed countries have security goals by which helps with providing safer and better living conditions while the developing countries are in processes with programs to help with the conditions in their country.

Read More
1545 Words | 7 Pages

It is the classic example of market failure. All in all, government intervention in healthcare is due to the government intervention itself. These interventions include the patent law which deliberated to advocate innovative activity and licensure which is intended to maintain minimal standards of quality. All these contribute to the monopoly power that dominates the whole market as well. The specific person or enterprise manages to control the whole market since they are the only supplier of a particular commodity.

Read More

More about Overview Of The National Health Insurance Model

Related Topics

Open Document