Should the Postal Rule be Abolished? Contract law is a form of the law which focuses on agreements made between two or more parties. Contracts can be made in an informal manner and can also be made formally. Most people would recognise a contract to be a formal written document which states the conditions, warranties and description of an offer being made. However, that is not always the case. Contracts are made in countless different ways, and each have their own rules which also apply in various ways. One of the most questionable rules that is in common use in the law of contracts is the Postal Rule. The Postal Rule is one of the more disputed rules in contract law as there has been an ongoing debate as to whether the postal rule should …show more content…
An advantage of using the postal rule would be that the party which is accepting the contract will receive some immediate advantages of the acceptance. Another advantage of using the postal rule is the use of last-minute acceptances. An obvious advantage of using the postal rule for the acceptance of contracts is for the offeree. This is because if the contract falls through and the offeror tries to retracts the contract, the postal rule moves in the favour of the offeree. The reason why this would work is because the postal rule means that as soon as the acceptance is placed in the post box, the contract has been formed. Along with advantages always come disadvantages and the postal rule comes some disadvantages. One disadvantage of it is if the offeree of the contract declines the offer, then that offer cannot be accepted at any other time. Once the offer is rejected the whole offer is terminated permanently. Another disadvantage of the postal rule is that some people believe it to be outdated. In the age of more digital communication, some people may ask “why do we still use the postal …show more content…
If this question was raised twenty, even twenty-five years ago, the obvious answer would be no, as using the postal service was one of the best forms of communication. However, in this age surrounded by bigger and better forms of communication than the postal service, would we still need a rule like the postal rule? This brings several questions such as: would it be better if we didn’t have the postal rule? What would change if we rid of the postal rule? What wouldn’t change? If we didn’t get rid of the postal rule obviously, nothing would change. Nothing would be different as the postal rule is still a common use in contract law today. So, all the rules which apply to contracts using the postal services and the postal rule, would still apply and still be
War can ruin a county no matter the winner. The amount of money it takes to fuel a war is incrediable. Most often leaving behind major amounts of debt and a county trying to find a way to get there money back. Due to the French and Indian War Britian was in debt and looking for a way to make up there debt quick. Unforconatly for the colonist of the new land this was ment for them.
In March of 1766, Britain annulled the burdensome Stamp Act, because of the great resistance. The ordinance had to be enforced on the first of November in 1765. However, only a few stamps were sold. Moreover, the spreaders of these marks were prosecuted by furious colonials, which opposed such regime. The opposition to the Stamp Act was depicted in different ways.
The following year, the Stamp Act was passed. All official documents and papers were required to have an official stamp. The colonists were outraged. They complained that because of their distance from England, they were receiving inadequate representation in Parliament. They had not agreed to have these new taxes placed on their colonies.
The United States Postal Service has been used for many years, sending mail far and near. It is still being used today. Dating back to the colonial times of America, mail was delivered by the Pony Express, today mail is being sent by cars, airplanes, and ships. Our country is long overdue for restructuring the USPS. The USPS should be restructured so they can gain revenue, still have convenience, and to keep up to date with developing technology.
The Stamp Act of 1765 had not been a first time attempt on taxation of the Americans. The Parliament had passed the Sugar Act and Currency act the year before. Since the tax was gathered at ports, it was easily avoided. Once Parliament passed the Stamp Act in March of 1765, things started to change.
Contacts are base into common law and it consists of three things; offer, acceptance, and consideration. Acceptance is understanding the contacts and the knowledge of it so you know what you are getting yourself into. Consideration a.k.a. Quid pro quo, is basically when both parties gives, its likes you give, I give sort of thing.
Some of the things that happened soon after they passed the Stamp Act was colonial resistance. Colonists did not want to be taxed on a war they didn 't even fight in or have a say in. The war was France and Britain fighting over who got control over North America. All the colonists were doing was living there and the war did not involve them. Also, violators of the Stamp Act could be tried and convicted without juries in the vice-admiralty courts.
The British parliament passed the stamp act 1665 that required all printed paper to have a stamp to be approved which allowed the British to censor. That act was later repealed by parliament and in 1700 the Townshend Acts were put in place that
The Stamp Act was passed in British Parliament on February 17, 1765 and received Royal Assessment on March 22, 1765. The Stamp Act was proposed by Prime Minister George Grenville and was passed without debate and it would take effect in November of that year. Prior to the Stamp Act there was a war between Great Britain and France. Though Great Britain won the war, it came to a cost of a deep debt. British Parliament recognized that the colonies were lightly taxed and felt that they should pay more thus came the stamp act which enforced all colonial citizens to pay a stamp duty or tax on all official papers from official
Explain the need for different types of mail services Mail services could include postal services such as Royal Mail, and an organisation having their own internal system or the use of a courier company. 5.3. Explain the factors to be considered when selecting mail
This Act required Taxed Stamps to be placed on printed materials. These stamps had to be purchased using the British sterling coin, which was not prevalent in the colonies. Colonist saw the pitfalls of this act and began to seek equal liberty with British Parliament. Not yet seeking independence, the colonist wanted British leaders to rethink how government worked. Opposition continued to rise as these ideals were rejected by Royal Rule.
Much like the infamous Siberian snow leopard, the first past the post system is a predator in the way it targets small parties and causes discord amongst the Canadian people. But, also like the fierce Siberian snow leopard, the first past the post system does not belong in Canada. When Trudeau stepped into office he brought with him many promises he has yet to fulfill, one of which is to focus on the electoral system and looking into alternatives. Canada has been continuously playing themselves by using first past the post. Ever since the creation of the Canadian government in 1867, the Canadian electoral process has been exposed to manipulation through its chosen electoral process.
In 1765 March 22, The Stamp Act began. It was when American colonists were taxed on any kind of paper product. Such as ship’s paper, legal documents, licenses, newspapers, other publications, and even playing cards were taxed. All of the money that was taxed was used to pay the costs of defending and protecting the American frontier near the Appalachians Mountains. Although this act was unpopular among the colonists.
The pros of FPTP are generally considered to be that it is easy for voters to understand and that it is the voting system that people in Canada are most used to. Vote counting is of course a lot simpler too, compared to other systems that would require a lot more rigorous counting systems. Simplicity is obviously a very important part of any voting system, the average voter needs to understand how their vote works. However, the simplicity is often and lack of representation is often used as an example as to why voter turnout is shrinking as many feel like their votes do not matter. Although whether it is a positive or a negative depends on the viewpoint, first past the post does lead to more majority governments than a MMP form of democracy
A dispute that might otherwise go to court becomes subject to binding arbitration only by the agreement of the parties. In this sense, arbitration is a creature of contract, and the terms of the parties’ particular arbitration agreement are generally controlling. Private arbitration is now governed by the Arbitration Act 1996. The Arbitration (International Commercial) Act 1998 introduced the UNCITRAL Model Law as the procedural framework for international arbitrations. Many commercial contracts include what is known as a Scott v Avery clause, whereby parties agree that in the event of a dispute arising between them, they will resort to arbitration to settle the dispute.