ipl-logo

Alexander Hamilton Federalist 78

499 Words2 Pages

Hamilton Federalist 78

Alexander Hamilton was one of the most interesting authors of the Federalist Papers. His insight and pragmatism helped shape many aspects of the new government. At the start of the Federalist No. 78, he began by explaining to the readers of the importance of a separate and independent judicial branch and what the meaning of judicial review is.
The Constitution defines the extent of the powers of the general government. If the legislative branch would at any time overstep their limits, the judicial department would keep it in check. If the United States goes beyond its influences, if and try to make a law in which the Constitution does not authorize, it is invalid by definition and the judicial power, the Supreme Court Judges, who are in place to secure their impartiality, are to be made independent, will declare it to be void. “On the other hand, if the states go beyond their limits, if they make a law which …show more content…

Hamilton stated that the Judiciary branch is the least hazardous to the political rights that the judicial branch possess only the power to judge, not to act on its rulings and it hinges on the executive branch to carry out its orders. The judicial branch will succeed due in part to its own neutrality so they can grant fair and unbiased rulings. Political rights are least threatened by the judicial branch due in part to its inability to control either the monetary funds or the military of the country. The judicial branch has no power over the writing of laws or the enforcement of them which allows for it to be completely neutral in its decision-making process. Hamilton praises the Constitution for founding courts that are separate from Congress and their influence allowing for a truly free

Show More
Related

Federalist No. 78 Summary

63 Words | 1 Pages

There was discussion of judicial review in Federalist No. 78, written by Alexander Hamilton, which explained that the federal courts would have the power of judicial review. Hamilton stated that under the Constitution, the federal judiciary would have the power to declare laws unconstitutional. He also stated that this was appropriate because it would protect the people against abuse of power by Congress.

Read More

Comparing The Rhode Island Responses To The Kentucky And Virginia Resolutions

975 Words | 4 Pages

It stated that giving states this right would be, “1st Blending together legislative and judicial powers. 2nd Hazarding an interruption of the peace of the states by civil discord, in case of a diversity of opinions among the state legislature. 3rd

Read More

Summary Of The Federalist Paper No. 67

1289 Words | 6 Pages

Hamilton stresses the importance of balanced power, as well as the involvement of all branches in both local and national agendas (Gais). Hamilton wants to make clear that democracy is completely different than a monarchy in the fact that the president, who is chosen by the people, will never become some type of superior human. The United States is one of the first nations to practice democracy, so there was no country to look towards as a model. This made Hamilton’s job difficult because he had to encourage Americans to trust the process of building a great nation. The other part of Federalist 67 comments about the president’s ability to appoint officials to vacancies in the government.

Read More

Analysis Of Federalist Paper Number 70 By Alexander Hamilton

1552 Words | 7 Pages

In Federalist Paper Number 70, Alexander Hamilton wrote an article titled The Executive Department Further Considered. In this paper Hamilton using the pseudonym Publius, makes the case for a single-person executive chief for the future federal government. Hamilton writes that the President must have qualities as an “Executive which are the most necessary ingredients…vigor and expedition. ”

Read More

Alexander Hamilton's Contribution Of The Preamble To The Constitution

1511 Words | 7 Pages

(1).” This group did not the Constitution did not properly state the rights and powers of the three branches of government, states’ rights, etc. In order to please the Anti-federalists, the Preamble was put into place to allow American citizens know the central government’s rights, and states’ rights. Lecture 15 “Questions to Consider #1”: In what ways does the modern American economy resemble the plan set out in Hamilton’s three great reports?

Read More

Analysis Of Federalist No. 69 By Alexander Hamilton

487 Words | 2 Pages

In “Federalist No. 69”, Alexander Hamilton wrote to inform and persuade the public to agree to the ratification of the U.S. Constitution. Particularly, he focused on the executive leadership’s role in the new government. He described the number of years the President can serve for before he is eligible for reelection. The President’s conduct and actions regarding legal matters are described as not being above the law. Law-making checks are imposed on the President as the two houses carry a large say.

Read More

Ratifying The Constitution Dbq Research Paper

1002 Words | 5 Pages

Hamilton responded to this concern in the essays by saying the unity of the states were at risk of falling apart without a national government to hold everything together, and that by implementing a judicial branch and the Presidential veto, there was a series of checks and balances that would prevent the Congress from becoming too powerful. In addition, the members of the House of Representatives were elected by the people, which would prevent them from acting against the people’s best interests. By taking each section of the document separately the three writers were able to discuss benefits of the Constitution, like improving the economy, supporting a Navy and defense, and just generally what specific powers, and limits on powers, were given to the various branches of the newly proposed government. Hamilton also pointed out that if this new form of government turned out to have hiccups, it was not set in stone, and amendments could be proposed to modify and improve the

Read More

Debate Between Hamilton Pros And Cons

1426 Words | 6 Pages

Overall Hamilton had the best view on how the courts would slowly evolve. The Federalists and Anti-Federalists both argued on the topic of executive powers. They argued this topic in Federalist 67 and Cato V. The Federalists believed that the change was straying away from a monarchy. The Anti-Federalists thought that this kind of rule would lead to oppression and corruption.

Read More

Constitutional Dbq Essay

1227 Words | 5 Pages

The Constitution is frequently thought to be the preeminent law of the United States that all laws made after it ought to maintain. Hamilton expressed that "the Constitution should be the standard of development for the laws, and that wherever there is an obvious restriction, the laws should offer place to the Constitution" (Document E). In any case, there have been times in United States history where a law has been passed that collides with the Constitution. On the off chance that the Constitution truly is the preeminent law of the United States, than any unlawful law that is passed ought to be toppled. In the event that the Supreme Court did not have the force of legal audit, than the privileges of the Constitution would gradually be taken away by new laws that contention with the Constitution.

Read More

Why Did The Articles Of Confederation Only Last 10 Years

781 Words | 4 Pages

Regulating the branches of government is crucial to the success of our country, so the constitution laid out the concept of “checks and balances”. For example, the president can veto any bill passed by legislature. In this case, the executive branch checks the legislative branch of government. If this wasn’t possible, congress could pass any bill they want, and ultimately become a powerhouse. These guidelines help keep the government intact, and in turn keep the constitution intact.

Read More

How Did Alexander Hamilton Influence Today

516 Words | 3 Pages

His influence on the arena of politics includes composing the majority of the Federalist Papers, leading America’s first political party, establishing the first national bank of the United States and the first tax on internal goods, and publicizing his belief in abolitionism. Hamilton’s contribution to the Federalist Papers influenced the future of the government of the United States. The Federalist Papers were a series of 85 essays that defended the newly written Constitution that resulted from the failure of the government under the Articles of Confederation. Alexander Hamilton was the principal author. He wrote 51 of the essays while his counterparts, James Madison and John Jay, wrote 29 and 5 respectively (Chernow 248).

Read More

Summary Of The Federalist Paper 78, By Alexander Hamilton

1692 Words | 7 Pages

In order to correctly analyze these questions we must have the general understanding that throughout the Federalists paper#78, Alexander Hamilton expressed the idea and importance he saw with how the Judicial branch needed to be fully independent from both the executive and legislative branch, in order to protect the public from deficiencies of decision-making by each of those two branches of government. Thus, Hamilton held that in order for the Judicial branch to perform its duties well this independence was needed. As a result, no errors in their judgment can be corrected by any institution or body of government, (Federalist Paper, #78), and in a modern sense you can see this with the supremacy of law, in which states that all acts of government

Read More

Federalist 51 Analysis

607 Words | 3 Pages

The Federalist is a collection of eighty-five essays written by James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay between October 1787 and May 1788. They were written to convince New York State to ratify the U.S. Constitution. Each essay was signed “Publius” even though they were written by three different authors, Hamilton wrote fifty-two, Madison’s wrote twenty-eight, and Jay wrote five of the essays. These articles were aimed to modifying public opinion in favor of ratifying the new Constitution. One of the most famous of the Federalist Papers, Number Fifty One, explains the Constitutional the fundamental truth of checks and balances.

Read More

Alexander Hamilton: The Weakest Branch Of Government

349 Words | 2 Pages

In 1787-1788 eighty-five essays appeared in the New York newspaper, they were supporting the federal constitution, Alexander Hamilton was one of the writers. Hamilton was responding to antifederalist who had claimed that absence of the Bill of Rights and a powerful Judiciary would bring oppression to the people. Hamilton argued that Judiciary was a weak branch of government compared to Executive and Legislature because it lacked an army to command and would only react to what the two branches of the government had proposed. I disagree with the statement by Alexander Hamilton that judiciary is the weakest branch of the government, maybe at that time it could have been viewed as so, but its power has increased through several amendments (Jellum, 2008). The Congress creates law, for example, they created the National Prohibition in the 1920s, and the president executes the laws by ensuring all the laws passed by the Congress are implemented.

Read More

Strengths And Weaknesses Of Judicial Branch

592 Words | 3 Pages

However, one weakness of the judicial branch is that Congress can overrule their decisions. For example, Congress overturn the Supreme Court’s decision in Chisholm vs Georgia case in 1793 because of the Amendment XI to the U.S. Constitution. Congress have some control this branch listed last on the U.S. Constitution. All in all, the judicial branch looked at as the powerful to U.S. citizen’s but has a weakness of having their decision overruled by the Executive (executive of the laws) and Legislative branch (creator of the laws). C. One option to maintain the strength of the branch of government discussed above.

Read More

More about Alexander Hamilton Federalist 78

Related Topics

Open Document