ipl-logo

Alexander Hamilton Federalist 78

499 Words2 Pages

Hamilton Federalist 78

Alexander Hamilton was one of the most interesting authors of the Federalist Papers. His insight and pragmatism helped shape many aspects of the new government. At the start of the Federalist No. 78, he began by explaining to the readers of the importance of a separate and independent judicial branch and what the meaning of judicial review is.
The Constitution defines the extent of the powers of the general government. If the legislative branch would at any time overstep their limits, the judicial department would keep it in check. If the United States goes beyond its influences, if and try to make a law in which the Constitution does not authorize, it is invalid by definition and the judicial power, the Supreme Court Judges, who are in place to secure their impartiality, are to be made independent, will declare it to be void. “On the other hand, if the states go beyond their limits, if they make a law which …show more content…

Hamilton stated that the Judiciary branch is the least hazardous to the political rights that the judicial branch possess only the power to judge, not to act on its rulings and it hinges on the executive branch to carry out its orders. The judicial branch will succeed due in part to its own neutrality so they can grant fair and unbiased rulings. Political rights are least threatened by the judicial branch due in part to its inability to control either the monetary funds or the military of the country. The judicial branch has no power over the writing of laws or the enforcement of them which allows for it to be completely neutral in its decision-making process. Hamilton praises the Constitution for founding courts that are separate from Congress and their influence allowing for a truly free

Show More
Related

Federalist No. 78 Summary

63 Words | 1 Pages

There was discussion of judicial review in Federalist No. 78, written by Alexander Hamilton, which explained that the federal courts would have the power of judicial review. Hamilton stated that under the Constitution, the federal judiciary would have the power to declare laws unconstitutional. He also stated that this was appropriate because it would protect the people against abuse of power by Congress.

Read More

Comparing The Rhode Island Responses To The Kentucky And Virginia Resolutions

975 Words | 4 Pages

It stated that giving states this right would be, “1st Blending together legislative and judicial powers. 2nd Hazarding an interruption of the peace of the states by civil discord, in case of a diversity of opinions among the state legislature. 3rd

Read More

Summary Of The Federalist Paper No. 67

1289 Words | 6 Pages

Following the ratification of the United States’ Constitution, Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison compiled a list of letters to provide more information to the American public. These letters, also known as the Federalist Papers, detail the specifics regarding branches of government, status of citizenship, and the democratic role of the people.  Federalist Paper No. 67, titled the Executive Department and written by Alexander Hamilton, focuses on the powers of the executive branch and calms the fears of the doubtful citizens. In addition, it provides information on the executive branch’s responsibilities and ways to increase the overall effectiveness of running an admirable government for the newly-independent United States of America.

Read More

Analytical Essay 80 Of The Federalist Papers By Alexander Hamilton

524 Words | 3 Pages

The Federalist Papers is a collection of 85 articles and essays written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay to promote the ratification of the United States Constitution. Modern day use the Federalist Papers to interpret the Constitution to look at the intentions of the framers and ratifies. This has been used on issues ranging from the power of the federal government in foreign affairs. However, there has been issues regarding the interpretation of the articles. That it is a lot of opinion that comes from the authors.

Read More

Analysis Of Federalist Paper Number 70 By Alexander Hamilton

1552 Words | 7 Pages

In Federalist Paper Number 70, Alexander Hamilton wrote an article titled The Executive Department Further Considered. In this paper Hamilton using the pseudonym Publius, makes the case for a single-person executive chief for the future federal government. Hamilton writes that the President must have qualities as an “Executive which are the most necessary ingredients…vigor and expedition. ”

Read More

Analysis Of Federalist No. 69 By Alexander Hamilton

487 Words | 2 Pages

In “Federalist No. 69”, Alexander Hamilton wrote to inform and persuade the public to agree to the ratification of the U.S. Constitution. Particularly, he focused on the executive leadership’s role in the new government. He described the number of years the President can serve for before he is eligible for reelection. The President’s conduct and actions regarding legal matters are described as not being above the law. Law-making checks are imposed on the President as the two houses carry a large say.

Read More

Alexander Hamilton's Contribution Of The Preamble To The Constitution

1511 Words | 7 Pages

(1).” This group did not the Constitution did not properly state the rights and powers of the three branches of government, states’ rights, etc. In order to please the Anti-federalists, the Preamble was put into place to allow American citizens know the central government’s rights, and states’ rights. Lecture 15 “Questions to Consider #1”: In what ways does the modern American economy resemble the plan set out in Hamilton’s three great reports?

Read More

Ratifying The Constitution Dbq Research Paper

1002 Words | 5 Pages

Hamilton responded to this concern in the essays by saying the unity of the states were at risk of falling apart without a national government to hold everything together, and that by implementing a judicial branch and the Presidential veto, there was a series of checks and balances that would prevent the Congress from becoming too powerful. In addition, the members of the House of Representatives were elected by the people, which would prevent them from acting against the people’s best interests. By taking each section of the document separately the three writers were able to discuss benefits of the Constitution, like improving the economy, supporting a Navy and defense, and just generally what specific powers, and limits on powers, were given to the various branches of the newly proposed government. Hamilton also pointed out that if this new form of government turned out to have hiccups, it was not set in stone, and amendments could be proposed to modify and improve the

Read More

Debate Between Hamilton Pros And Cons

1426 Words | 6 Pages

The two clashed over many topics such as: the Judicial branch, a stringe union, and the executive powers. Federalist 78 and Brutus XI both discussed the topic of Section XII. This section was all about setting up the supreme court system. Alexander Hamilton, the writer of Federalist 78, believed that there were three objects that needed to be embraced.

Read More

Constitutional Dbq Essay

1227 Words | 5 Pages

The Constitution is frequently thought to be the preeminent law of the United States that all laws made after it ought to maintain. Hamilton expressed that "the Constitution should be the standard of development for the laws, and that wherever there is an obvious restriction, the laws should offer place to the Constitution" (Document E). In any case, there have been times in United States history where a law has been passed that collides with the Constitution. On the off chance that the Constitution truly is the preeminent law of the United States, than any unlawful law that is passed ought to be toppled. In the event that the Supreme Court did not have the force of legal audit, than the privileges of the Constitution would gradually be taken away by new laws that contention with the Constitution.

Read More

Constitution Protect Against Tyranny Essay

557 Words | 3 Pages

The Judicial Branch is the judge of any laws that the President or Congress passes, they decide if the law goes along with the Constitution. Without this system our government would fall into a complete disaster and most likely become a dictatorship. Given these points, it is obvious that the power in our government needs to be

Read More

Why Did The Articles Of Confederation Only Last 10 Years

781 Words | 4 Pages

Regulating the branches of government is crucial to the success of our country, so the constitution laid out the concept of “checks and balances”. For example, the president can veto any bill passed by legislature. In this case, the executive branch checks the legislative branch of government. If this wasn’t possible, congress could pass any bill they want, and ultimately become a powerhouse. These guidelines help keep the government intact, and in turn keep the constitution intact.

Read More

How Did Alexander Hamilton Influence Today

516 Words | 3 Pages

His influence on the arena of politics includes composing the majority of the Federalist Papers, leading America’s first political party, establishing the first national bank of the United States and the first tax on internal goods, and publicizing his belief in abolitionism. Hamilton’s contribution to the Federalist Papers influenced the future of the government of the United States. The Federalist Papers were a series of 85 essays that defended the newly written Constitution that resulted from the failure of the government under the Articles of Confederation. Alexander Hamilton was the principal author. He wrote 51 of the essays while his counterparts, James Madison and John Jay, wrote 29 and 5 respectively (Chernow 248).

Read More

Rosenberg's Argument That The Court Is The Most Dangerous Branch

609 Words | 3 Pages

If Rosenberg is correct, this does not mean that Hamilton’s argument that the Court is the “least dangerous branch” is also correct. Rosenberg’s view that courts can only produce significant social change given weak barriers and constraints does not by itself qualify Hamilton’s argument. There are other ways that the Court exerts influence in the political system other than promoting social change. There are three branches of government under the Constitution: (1) Executive, (2) Legislative, and (3) Judicial. The framers of the Constitution intended for the three branches to interact through a system of checks and balances, the mechanisms through which each branch is able to participate in and influence the activities of the other branches.

Read More

Federalist 51 Analysis

607 Words | 3 Pages

The Federalist is a collection of eighty-five essays written by James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay between October 1787 and May 1788. They were written to convince New York State to ratify the U.S. Constitution. Each essay was signed “Publius” even though they were written by three different authors, Hamilton wrote fifty-two, Madison’s wrote twenty-eight, and Jay wrote five of the essays. These articles were aimed to modifying public opinion in favor of ratifying the new Constitution. One of the most famous of the Federalist Papers, Number Fifty One, explains the Constitutional the fundamental truth of checks and balances.

Read More

More about Alexander Hamilton Federalist 78

Related Topics

Open Document