ipl-logo

Analysis Of Federalist No. 69 By Alexander Hamilton

487 Words2 Pages

In “Federalist No. 69”, Alexander Hamilton wrote to inform and persuade the public to agree to the ratification of the U.S. Constitution. Particularly, he focused on the executive leadership’s role in the new government. He described the number of years the President can serve for before he is eligible for reelection. The President’s conduct and actions regarding legal matters are described as not being above the law. Law-making checks are imposed on the President as the two houses carry a large say. A detailed explanation of his role as commander-in-chief is described, as well as his duty to appoint individuals for various parts of his cabinet and the government. He informed the reader of the duties the executive leader would possess while stressing the limited authority he or she would have in comparison to the king of Great Britain. As a result, this was a driving force towards the citizens agreeing to a change in government. (156 words) …show more content…

The president is neither treated like a king nor treated as though he is above the law. He is restricted to absolute decisions he can make on his own because specific checks refer him to either the Senate or House. Hamilton describes how the British King is able to rule because of hereditary qualifications. The President, on the other hand, is elected by a group of people and his time to serve is limited, unlike the King’s. A King gets the final say in determining if a law is passed or not; the executive leader, however, does not. If a veto is imposed, the bill gets tossed back into the houses. Many examples like these are made throughout, which makes Hamilton’s argument persuasive in regards to the audience of the day. (174

Show More
Related
63 Words | 1 Pages

There was discussion of judicial review in Federalist No. 78, written by Alexander Hamilton, which explained that the federal courts would have the power of judicial review. Hamilton stated that under the Constitution, the federal judiciary would have the power to declare laws unconstitutional. He also stated that this was appropriate because it would protect the people against abuse of power by Congress.

Read More
1152 Words | 5 Pages

In the early years, after winning independence from Great Britain, the American colonies set up their government in accordance with their first constitution, the Articles of Confederation. This means that the majority of the power laid in the hands of the states and Congress, “the only institution of national authority” (Brinkley 151) at that time, had very little power. This distribution of authority was the manifestation of the American’s fear of a strong, central government. However, as time passed, more and more people came to agree that the national government was too weak and needed to be strengthened.

Read More
774 Words | 4 Pages

The Federalist Papers No. 51 were written by either James Madison or Alexander Hamilton to address the various concerns the residents of New York had with the newly formed government provided to them and the other colonies via the Constitution, more specifically the purpose of the new structure of government, the separation into different branches of the government and each branch’s reliance on the people, and the system of checks and balances and duties placed on each branch among other things. The Federalist Papers No. 51 also explained the necessity of the government outlined in the Constitution and why the founding fathers found it best to arrange the new government the way they did. One of the main ideas addressed in the Federalist

Read More
1552 Words | 7 Pages

However, when referring to the legislature, Hamilton turned 180 degrees and instead proffered that the people’s house be cautious and methodical. He wrote, “In the legislature, promptitude of decision is oftener an evil than a benefit. The differences of opinion, and the jarrings of parties in that department of the government, though they may sometimes

Read More
529 Words | 3 Pages

In the hundreds of years since the US was founded, the role of the President has changed dramatically. From the very beginning of the country to the complexities of the modern era, unexpected changes, including those that could not be predicted by the creators of our constitution, have happened. While the founders fancied a powerful executive, they also imagined that the presidency would work within the constraints set forth in the Constitution and with cooperation with the other branches of the government. This is very clear in the US Constitution as well as Federalist 51, which are the foundations of this country. To begin with, the power of executive orders has expanded the oversight of the role of the President.

Read More
1511 Words | 7 Pages

(1).” This group did not the Constitution did not properly state the rights and powers of the three branches of government, states’ rights, etc. In order to please the Anti-federalists, the Preamble was put into place to allow American citizens know the central government’s rights, and states’ rights. Lecture 15 “Questions to Consider #1”: In what ways does the modern American economy resemble the plan set out in Hamilton’s three great reports?

Read More
747 Words | 3 Pages

In 1789, George Washington was elected as the first president of the new American republic. He selected several people to serve in his cabinet, among which were Alexander Hamilton, an ambitious young immigrant, and Thomas Jefferson, a wealthy plantation owner. Hamilton and Jefferson argued endlessly over various issues, and decisions about these issues contributed greatly to the shaping of our nation. Many of their beliefs have influenced our country to this day, especially their varying perspectives on the Constitution. Hamilton’s belief that the Constitution should be interpreted loosely had a greater effect on the early republic than the strict constructionist view that Jefferson held.

Read More
1002 Words | 5 Pages

How do you convince some newly independent citizens of the benefits of ratifying a constitution? According to Alexander Hamilton, through writing, and lots of it. In 1787, Hamilton, along with James Madison and John Jay, published a series of documents, addressing concerns the people might have about the Constitution drafted by the Congressional delegates. The Constitution was being sent to the states for ratification, but in New York, many were opposed to the ideas put forth. Hamilton, Madison, and Jay wrote eighty-five documents which would later be named The Federalist Papers, as they voiced the common opinion of the Federalist party, which was in favor of ratification.

Read More
210 Words | 1 Pages

The topic I would be doing would be on/about Alexander Hamilton in regards to The Federalist Papers. This topic is significant, because it draws on the Founding Father whose writing influenced/shaped the composition of the Early American Republic, and has given rise to many institutions/developments that can be traced to this day. As quite a controversial and well-debated document, The Federalist Papers was designed as a series of essays used to defend the Constitution—upon which we still call upon today. The five sources that provide a basic foundation to begin the project are: “To Begin the World Anew” by Bernard Bailyn, “The Political Psychology of the Federalist” by Daniel Walker Howe, “Ethos in Law and History: Alexander Hamilton,

Read More
392 Words | 2 Pages

I Agree… “The Federalist No. 84” and “The Anti-Federalist No.84”, both have their views on what should happen to our government. Whether it is to add a bill of rights or not, but I agree with the writer of “The Federalist No.84” because if the Constitution is adopted, then it will be our Bill of Rights, also based on other countries’ bill of rights then it may argue with a semblance of reason. Because I have read both sides of the discussion, I can see who is wrong and why.

Read More
1155 Words | 5 Pages

The author believes that a nation’s ruler should be held to certain laws. When it comes to a President though, he fells that they can use the military however they want to benefit themselves. The President would be able to break any rule in office if he would ever to be in trouble, since he would have the military there to back him up. The Author would rather have a King who has to follow guidelines, just like the common people, though not the same rules. A King doesn’t truly control the army, and the author is afraid of what would happen with a national republic and what the consequences

Read More
1535 Words | 7 Pages

The standard for Hamilton’s life tenure argument was good behavior. For Hamilton, good behavior was of great value because it would be a “barrier to the encroachments” of the “representative body,” (O’Brien 345, 346, Federalist No. 78) meaning that Justices would be able to protect the people from

Read More
465 Words | 2 Pages

Before he was president, George Washington crossed the Delaware in the middle of the night to attack the British army even though his troops were tired, cold, and starving. In the end, George Washington’s men won the battle because of the decision made by their virtuous, devoted General. When it came to determining who would be the leader in this new country, he George Washington was the best option because he proved himself a good leader. George Washington did not adhere to his troops wishes, but pressed on in the fight because it was what was best for the country. In other words, presidents are not obligated to follow public opinion, two reasons for this being: presidents are not directly elected by the people and doing so could be a danger to society.

Read More
356 Words | 2 Pages

In light of recent events in our country, there has been no better time in our history than the present to illustrate how Madison was a visionary in supporting the Constitution via his Federalist Number 10 argument. The removal or defacement of Confederate statues by those other than government employees is prime example of his argument. Despite the sometimes illegal removal and resultant damage, the persons responsible continue to wreak havoc in local communities and do not appear to be suffering any consequences from the federal government. National polls conducted just last month revealed a majority of Americans do not approve of removing Confederate monuments. In spite of this, statues have been removed and damage caused to them by

Read More
978 Words | 4 Pages

The Federalist No. 10” is a persuasive argument written by James Madison in an attempt to ratify the Constitution. He wrote a series of documents called the Federalist Papers under a pseudonym to convince others to approve of the Constitution. He says that factions are not good for America, neither is a pure democracy. Madison provides extensive arguments and remedies for the problems he is addressing. James Madison is attempting to ratify the Constitution by analyzing the way to deal with factions, comparing a republic to a democracy, and by comparing a small government to a large government.

Read More

More about Analysis Of Federalist No. 69 By Alexander Hamilton

Related Topics

Open Document