ipl-logo

Checks And Balances Vs Federalist 51

529 Words3 Pages

In the hundreds of years since the US was founded, the role of the President has changed dramatically. From the very beginning of the country to the complexities of the modern era, unexpected changes, including those that could not be predicted by the creators of our constitution, have happened. While the founders fancied a powerful executive, they also imagined that the presidency would work within the constraints set forth in the Constitution and with cooperation with the other branches of the government. This is very clear in the US Constitution as well as Federalist 51, which are the foundations of this country. To begin with, the power of executive orders has expanded the oversight of the role of the President. Article II of the US Constitution lays out the …show more content…

Moreover, James Madison's Federalist 51 emphasizes that checks and balances are in place to avoid the abuses of power. Madison contends that the checking power of one branch of government should be matched by the checking power of another, but every branch should be fully empowered to do so. Recent presidents have often stepped around these limitations by making use of these executive actions, such as statements to interpret the laws in the manner they prefer and declaring the national emergency in order to undermine the legislature. Moving on, another source of power expansion over time can be found in constitutional amendments, specifically the Twenty-Second Amendment, which limits the President to serving no more than two terms in office.This particular amendment, which was ratified in 1951, was aimed at putting limits on the previous president, Franklin D. Roosevelt, who served four consecutive terms. The Twenty-Second Amendment illustrates the very fear of the founders of the monarchical

Show More
Related
339 Words | 2 Pages

In Federalist 51 Madison talks about the need for elected government officials to be controlled by a system of checks and balances. He talks about how each part of the government must be made sure as to not get too powerful as they might overpower the others. To do this Madison states that power must be distributed equally between each part, and divided as much as possible. For example Madison says “In the republican form of government, the legislative branch tends to be the most powerful.”

Read More
1314 Words | 6 Pages

Even with certain restrictions and checks of power the president still maintain some significant areas of power over congress such the ability to veto legislation passed by congress. This ability grants the president a significant amount of power over the legislative process in the U.S as ultimately he is able to set the agenda of the country’s political schedule, and determine the direction of the country’s political schedule. Along with the ability to enact vetoes without the interference of a hostile congress uncooperative congress. The president also posses the ability to set the agenda for what legislation to recommend to congress and to what priority level each recommendation should be given. This power does come with its limits though as most situations do not give the president the ultimate authority to force congress to address his proposal and he must instead convince congress to address his issue with priority.

Read More
868 Words | 4 Pages

David E. Vandercoy’s 1994 article, “The History of the Second Amendment,” appeared originally as 28 Val. L. Rev. 1007-1039 in Valparaiso University Law Review. Long overlooked, the Second Amendment has become the entity of some study and much discussion. The United States is the first country of its kind because of strong minded men and women who fought against all odds David E. Vandercoy (1994) addresses the history of the Second Amendment and attempt to define its original intent; not suggesting it is controlling. He quotes George Washington about how in order to preserve the rest of liberty, depending on the situation and circumstance, individuals entering into society must give up a share of it.

Read More
738 Words | 3 Pages

Monarchs believed that the power, that was appointed to them, was a gift from God Himself. Since their power was considered “Godly”, it was only a matter of time until they would abuse it. Kings and Queens could order to kill whoever opposes them, raise taxes for their own greed, and simply have control over the lives of thousands of people. A person who rules with all this power is considered to be a tyrant. The birth of this new nation was the result of the founders of this country trying to escape the grasp of a tyrant.

Read More
443 Words | 2 Pages

The congressional procedure outlined in the Constitution for impeachment and removal is an effective check on the president because it reinforces the idea of checks and balances. This can be seen in the Federalist papers, especially Federalist 51. It can also be seen in Brutus 1, where concerns about the abuse of executive power are stated. In Federalist 51, James Madison argues for the necessity of checks and balances to prevent any one branch of government from becoming too powerful. He highlights the importance of each branch being able to check on each other, making sure that liberty is reinforced.

Read More
919 Words | 4 Pages

Throughout history , presidents have taken different steps in abusing the executive orders and other presidential directives. Many citizens expressed different views over the executive abuse and benefits the presidents have. The increased use of executive legislation in the absence of challenges from Congress has expanded the power, boundaries, and pose a serious threat to the democracy.

Read More
539 Words | 3 Pages

The president of the United States is given the power to make presidential laws, also known as Executive orders. They are not voted on by citizens or congress and they can be made official and enforced by only the President’s signature. This power comes from the Constitution and has been used by all American presidents. Most recently, Barack Obama used this power to change the American immigration policy. There are three parts to the changes made to the immigration policy.

Read More
1030 Words | 5 Pages

An executive order tells the bureaucracy how to do something, usually carrying out one of Congress’s orders. That is, Congress will tell the executive branch that something has to be done, but not how to do it, and the president will use an executive order to guide the bureaucracy through accomplishing it. Often, the president writes hundreds of executive orders during his time in office (Document D5). Because the president creates these on his own and they have the effect of law, executive orders essentially allow the president to create and enforce policy unilaterally. This further expands the president’s power and authority by giving him the opportunity to decide what is appropriate for him to do.

Read More
523 Words | 3 Pages

The use of these powers determine if the president is going beyond the limits of the office. Many argue that the president has abused these powers with the use of the Unitary Executive Theory, which states that the Constitution puts the president in charge of executing the laws, and that nobody can limit the president’s power when it comes to executive powers. It therefore tips authority from Congress to the presidency, upsetting the power of checks and balances.

Read More
719 Words | 3 Pages

In Federalist 51, he focuses on how the Constitution divides the power of the government into three branches and so no one branch would have too much power. This was done by using the checks and balances system. Madison believes that each branch should be, for the most part, independent, but, to avoid any branches from abusing its power, no branch should have too much power in choosing the members of another. He says that to follow this rule strictly, the people of the United States would choose all members of all branches, but difficulties would arise as the people may not be aware of the best qualifications for each position. So, the branches check one another and the people elect the members other than in the judicial branch, whose members are chosen by the executive branch.

Read More
1576 Words | 7 Pages

Determining the specificities of what the framers originally intended, however, is the subject to some debate. Saikrishna Prakash, a distinguished Professor of Law at the University of Virginia, analyses the question of original meaning of executive power in his essay “The Essential Meaning of Executive Power”. He argues that not only is the president chief legislator, chief military officer, and the nation's top diplomat, he is “first and foremost...the chief executive empowered by the executive power to execute Congress’s laws and to control the law execution of executive officers”(Prakash, 820). He also acknowledges Justice Scalia’s assessment “that a complete understanding of the executive power might take 7,000 pages and thirty years to complete”(Prakash, 820). Suggesting that we have to be cautious in trying to analyze the presidency from a pure originalist point of view, and that we have to adapt to the ambiguities that result from the evolution of presidential power.

Read More
589 Words | 3 Pages

“... But the great security against a gradual concentration of the several powers in the same department consists in giving to those who administer each department the necessary constitutional means and personal motives to resist encroachments of the others.” In more simpler terms, Madison believed that no part of government should have more power than another. In order to do so, the Constitution talked about how checks and balances would solve that problem by each branch of governemnt checking on how the others are doing and making sure everything is in balance. The reason this is needed is because during the times of the Articles of Confederation, Americans believed that only a

Read More
682 Words | 3 Pages

The Constitution allows for a varying interpretation of executive power. It is largely up to the other branches, especially Congress, to restrict the expanding power of the presidency and maintain their own constitutional powers. During his presidency, George W. Bush characterized aspects of the Unitary Executive Theory through his excessive use of signing statements. President Bush’s controversial use of signing statements reignited a debate on the constitutionality of the signing statement. In his argument, Peter M. Shane cites the Bush administration as an example of the dangers of an unchecked executive power.

Read More
866 Words | 4 Pages

In 1951 the Twenty-Second Amendment became part of the U.S. Constitution. Since then Presidents Eisenhower, Reagan, Clinton, Bush, and Obama have served two terms. And if someone takes over as President for two years or more, such as when Vice President Gerald Ford stepped in after President Richard Nixon’s resignation in 1973, they can then only be re-elected once. Another reason they considered this is because, before the amendment was written, President Franklin Roosevelt won a record four elections and was the US head of state from 1933 until he died in 1945, just three months into his fourth term. President Roosevelt’s long presidency broke a tradition of US presidents only serving two terms, even though it was not required by law at that

Read More
543 Words | 3 Pages

James Madison wrote Federalist 51 over 200 years ago, yet its words still impact today’s government in 2016. When writing Federalist 51, Madison had two main objectives in mind; he wanted a government with a separation of powers, and he also wanted minorities to be protected. Both of his objectives have been accomplished and continue to be present in today’s American government with the latter objective being more present in today’s government even more so than in the past. To begin with, power is separated in today’s government, preventing a single person or group from having absolute power since, “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely,” according to John Dalberg-Acton. The American government is composed of three branches which power is separated amongst.

Read More

More about Checks And Balances Vs Federalist 51

Open Document