ipl-logo

Alexander The Great Speeches

498 Words2 Pages

Throughout history there has been many speeches. Some produced inspiration and joy to those who who heard it and other speeches spread dread and fear to all of those near. And there has been other speeches that were small and insignificant. This was not the case for Alexander the Great. He spoke multiple speeches throughout his lifetime and all of them were inspiring to his people and frightful to his enemies. Alexander the Great was a great leader and brilliant war strategist, so when he spoke everyone listened. Alexander the Great was the King of the Greek of kingdom Macedon. He had created one of the largest empires in the world during that time. He was undefeated in battle and is still considered one of the most successful military …show more content…

It was rather apparent to him that his men lack the will to start another conquest. So he told them that he would understand them being this way if their leader was just simply ordering them around while not facing any of the hardships that his soldiers did. Although, he told them that this was not the case, and that he has been there with them the whole time sharing in the same danger as them. Alexander also told his soldiers that all of these lands that they have conquered are theirs as well. He told them that those soldiers who want to go home are allowed to, but they soon will envy those who stayed with him. I have a lot of respect for this speech and Alexander the Great. It is very respectable that Alexander was willing to acknowledge his men 's lessening moral and went out and spoke to them. Also, the fact that he was along side with his soldiers and shared the same dangers that they did. In this speech it also shows how different Alexander was from many other rulers from around that time. He seemed to be a lot more generous with his people. An example of this is when he stated that these lands are yours too and that the governors of these lands will come from these

Show More
Related
781 Words | 4 Pages

He then set off and conquered Egypt, the Persian Empire, and won a hard battle against India before his troops forced him to return home. Alexander then died at the age of 32. Most people see Alexander as Great because he conquered a lot of land, built a massive empire, and was a military genius, but Alexander was not so great. Alexander the Great did not deserve his title as Great because he gained his power by fear, killed innocent

Read More
509 Words | 3 Pages

Throughout history, there has been great military leaders come and go. Although, one of the most well-known conquerors is Alexander the Great. Many people thought he was a good leader and a good king. However, the people he conquered think otherwise. The people who supported him say he was compassionate towards others.

Read More
597 Words | 3 Pages

Alexander of Macedonia inherited the throne when he was only 20 years old. His father, Philip of Macedonia built the Macedonian army into a deadly machine. When Alexander was on the throne, he set out to conquer Persia, which was at that time, the most powerful kingdom. He, Alexander the Third of Macedonia should be called Alexander the Great is because he had a big influence on the world, had genius battle strategies, and because he was respectful.

Read More
381 Words | 2 Pages

Did you know that Alexander the Great was one of the greatest conquers? Alexander was born in 358 B.C. and he lived in a kingdom in Greece called Macedonia. Alexander was the son of the King Phillip II, and Alexander became king. During his life, did Alexander show enough leadership, courage, and concern for others to be considered great? By these measures, Alexander was great for at least three reasons: military genius, inspiring leader, and spread of Greek cultures.

Read More
977 Words | 4 Pages

By doing this, it reminds people that this is his land. This proves that Alexander is creative because it not only reminds the Macedonians of his land, it reminds historians and other people in the present about his empire. In conclusion, it is clear that Alexander is extremely

Read More
739 Words | 3 Pages

Pericles and Lincoln’s Great Speeches Two very famous speeches have impacted the world with their diction and purpose. Pericles’ “Funeral Oration” and also Abraham Lincoln’s “Gettysburg Address” were both spoken at a public service for those who had been killed in the war. For Pericles this speech occurred in 431 BCE at the end of the first year of the Peloponnesian War. Later in time Abraham Lincoln spoke in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania about four months after the Battle of Gettysburg. While each speech commemorated those who had died in the war, they also inspired the remaining people to continue fighting and finish the war.

Read More
594 Words | 3 Pages

Alexander was able to lead the kingdom of Macedon to victory towards the “Thracian people called the Maedi” (Jarus) and renaming the city Alexandroupolis. Not only does this demonstrate his confidence as an individual, but

Read More
900 Words | 4 Pages

However, recently historians have started to contradict this opinion. Though many people think Alexander was great, he was not a great leader because he did not plan for his death, he thought himself better than he was, and he used brutal methods to conquer land. A great ruler should provide a good example to their people,

Read More
1369 Words | 6 Pages

He disagreed with the treatment given to the innocent people of the cities he conquered. He regretted being so harsh and became merciful in his campaign. One such example is when he let a woman go free even after she admitted to having killed a soldier and admitting that she herself was the daughter of a man that had once opposed King Philip, fearless of any repercussions that could have come from her confession. Alexander was also kind to the family of Darius with whom he was fighting. He provided them with decent living space during their fight and even let them know that Darius was not truly dead when they grew distraught at the idea

Read More
1216 Words | 5 Pages

This meant that he saw them as an asset to the kingdom whether they were in the military or ordinary citizens. Alexander used his people but not the way Charlemagne did. Charlemagne squeezed out details from anyone who might have a valuable information that he can use for military purposes. His advanced planning and calculation had prevented rebellions domestically and helped him conquered foreign lands. Charlemagne’s military conquest had outlived Alexander and even pass his succession that Alexander did not do.

Read More
498 Words | 2 Pages

He had very high standards at a very young age and surpassed those standards instantaneously (“Alexander the Great Biography”). One can infer that many looked up to Alexander and respected him. God believes that everyone is created equal; no matter if one is a slave, or a pawn, or a king, they are all equal in the eyes of God. However, when the time came, both of these people died.

Read More
1530 Words | 7 Pages

Glorious men have graced the earth and have left significant impressions on the following generations. Alexander the Great suits that profile like none other. As arguably one of the most influential military leaders in history, Alexander conquered the majority of the known world, including large-scale empires such as the Persian. Succeeding his father, Philip II, to the throne at the age of 20, Alexander commanded an already skilled military, which he schooled further in the beginning of his reign. Even militarily significant empires had no chance against Alexander 's military brilliance and so he constructed one of the largest empires in history.

Read More
1783 Words | 8 Pages

Instead of letting the women be enslaved and left to the whims of his men, Alexander is shown to have treated them with honor, respect and generosity. He does not treat them like prisoners, but like guests of honor in his camp. Plutarch uses this situation to show Alexander’s compassion and his rationality and sense of justice when it comes to protecting those under his domain. Another example is Alexander’s policy of letting his conquered territories to govern themselves independently and not robbing them of their freedom. Through these merciful and honorable acts of Alexander, Plutarch manages to highlight Alexander’s greatest traits as leader as an individual, and simultaneously support his argument that Alexander is inherently good and exceptional among

Read More
445 Words | 2 Pages

Alexander The Great’s title of “The Great” was not an exaggeration. To earn the title of “The Great”, you must've done some extremely good things as your reign as a king, queen, or emperor. Alexander The Great did many great and powerful things during his lifetime. He established an extremely powerful military, and he knew how to strategically conquer land, and he was interested in turning this conquered land into powerful areas.

Read More
1428 Words | 6 Pages

Alexander the Great was the king and renown general of Macedonia. He led the Greek army against Persia and used many bold tactics in battle. Alexander the Great significantly expanded the Greek legacy by conquering territories. When he conquered a territory, he would not force the locals to assimilate into the Greek culture. This is to ensure they would not rebel against his leadership.

Read More

More about Alexander The Great Speeches

Related Topics

Open Document