Alexander the Great is one of the most famous people in our world’s history. He achieved great challenges no other man could do. Alexander himself said, “There is nothing impossible to him who will try.” His achievments prove this quote without a doubt. Alexander of Macedon was born in 356 BCE to King Philip and his wife Olympia. His parents hired the philosopher Aristotle to educate Alexander in subjects such as politics, sports, and warfare. He grew a strong opinion of himself as the outcome of his education. He then concluded to the belief that he was a god. When Alexander’s father died, he inherited his army and his quest to conquer Persia. He successfully lead the army through the Persian Empire and conquered thousands of square miles …show more content…
When he encountered Porus at the Hydapses River, he engaged with him in an interesting way. Alexander realizes he cannot cross over the to where Porus was because of his numerous amount of elephants. Alexander decided to trick Porus into battle, and while he did that, he would take Porus’ elephants and use them as his own weapon. (Arrianus, document B). Alexander uses his creativeness to defeat an opponent in a way that would be difficult today. This proves that Alexander was creative because he looked on the other side of thing by using his opponents weapons to fight that opponent. In document A, the map shows that Alexander conquered a lot of land, but he did something to add onto that. Alexander named 11 cities “Alexandria,” clearly named after himself. (Alexander’s Empire, document A). Alexander shows creativeness by naming cities after himself. By doing this, it reminds people that this is his land. This proves that Alexander is creative because it not only reminds the Macedonians of his land, it reminds historians and other people in the present about his empire. In conclusion, it is clear that Alexander is extremely …show more content…
Most cities surrendered to Alexander without a fight. When Alexander reached the city of Tyre, they did not surrender because they believed that they were unconquerable, due to their protection by walls and location of an island. Alexander decided that their answer was not acceptable. Therefore, he began to build a causeway into Tyre that would allow Alexander and his army to enter the city. When Tyre held out for seven months, Alexander responded with violence. (Green, document C). Although some have argued that Alexander lacks concern, he did show empathy as well. Alexander may have used violence against Tyre, but he spared the lives of some people in return. In document C, the author says, “The great city...was now utterly destroyed. Her king, Azimilik, and other various notables including envoys from Carthage had taken refuge in the temple of Melkart, and Alexander spared their lives.” (Green, document C). Alexander may have just destroyed a city for his empire, but he showed concern by sparing the lives of those who took refuge. This proves that Alexander shows concern because the least he could do in the situation was make sure the victims were okay, and he did that. He spared the lives of the victims who took refuge. Clearly, there are reasons Alexander could be considered not great, but he shows outstanding qualities that prove