ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Alexander The Great

1076 Words5 Pages

Alexander the Great was known as one of the greatest leaders in all the Ancient Western World but, there is a darker side to his legacy. Alexander the Great should not be notorious for being a great leader who spread greek culture throughout the ancient world but as the man who had an unbeatable military, killed innocent people and had a military strategy that was to destroy and obliterate. Alexander the Great had full control of anything he touched. He was one of the wealthiest people to ever live and abused his powers of being leader of at the time, one of the most powerful nations in the world. Overall, Alexander the great should not be held to the name Alexander the Great because it wasn’t his battle tactics and knowledge that lead him to never lose a battle but it was the sheer quantity and skill of his military that made them great. He declared to his troops to kill innocent people in cities that he took over and because his military tactics were to destroy and obliterate.
Many people argue about the fact that Alexander the lll, former King of Macedonia, was awarded with the title Alexander the Great for his accomplishment as leader of the Macedonian empire and his effect on the ancient world. Although, …show more content…

Alexander inherited the throne that his father had controlled, at a very young age. With this inheritance, he not only had a powerful militia and backing, but he also inherited a volatile kingdom that was enduring a period of unrest.”(TotallyHistory 1). When Alexander was granted King of Macedonia and received the roll of taking the throne, he had been granted with an unassailable military, the power of being King of Macedonia and the knowledge of his father which Alexander relied on heavily. Generally speaking, Alexander the Great was a well accomplished military leader and commander but without his father's power, skills and military, Alexander wouldn’t have been as successful as he had

Show More
Related
781 Words | 4 Pages

He then set off and conquered Egypt, the Persian Empire, and won a hard battle against India before his troops forced him to return home. Alexander then died at the age of 32. Most people see Alexander as Great because he conquered a lot of land, built a massive empire, and was a military genius, but Alexander was not so great. Alexander the Great did not deserve his title as Great because he gained his power by fear, killed innocent

Read More
343 Words | 2 Pages

Long ago, back into the time of ancient Greek, was a young 20 year old British Macedonian king called Alexander. He was a very brave, dauntless, and generous man to his followers. He had conquered a vast of land and made it his empire. He had found 70 cities and named most of them Alexandria. He spread Greek ideas and culture to the world.

Read More
677 Words | 3 Pages

Alexander the great crucified two thousand defeated soldiers and sold thirty thousand into slavery (Doc C). Alexander the great was born in 356 B.C.E and he was taught by a Greek philosopher, Aristotle (BGE). Alexander's father was assassinated in 336 B.C.E and Alexander took over at the age of twenty (BGE). He used his military skills to conquer most of the known world until he died in 323 B.C.E, and his empire soon followed the same fate (BGE). Was Alexander the Great great?

Read More
597 Words | 3 Pages

Alexander of Macedonia inherited the throne when he was only 20 years old. His father, Philip of Macedonia built the Macedonian army into a deadly machine. When Alexander was on the throne, he set out to conquer Persia, which was at that time, the most powerful kingdom. He, Alexander the Third of Macedonia should be called Alexander the Great is because he had a big influence on the world, had genius battle strategies, and because he was respectful.

Read More
381 Words | 2 Pages

Did you know that Alexander the Great was one of the greatest conquers? Alexander was born in 358 B.C. and he lived in a kingdom in Greece called Macedonia. Alexander was the son of the King Phillip II, and Alexander became king. During his life, did Alexander show enough leadership, courage, and concern for others to be considered great? By these measures, Alexander was great for at least three reasons: military genius, inspiring leader, and spread of Greek cultures.

Read More
881 Words | 4 Pages

Alexander was practically unbeatable shown that every war fought resulted in him succeeding and winning over the land. Another piece of evidence is the statistics of his legacy, Alexander’s territory grew to a massive 2,000,000 sq miles. As well as this he was able to take control of this much land in only 11 years (Doc E). He was only around 30 years old when he met his fathers goal of conquering the Persia Empire. Alexander made this achievement look easy when it only took a few conflicts and through this he still care for his soldiers and never put himself first unless he was leading his army into

Read More
1756 Words | 8 Pages

Despite Alexander not being politically great, society remembers him as great because of his military prowess

Read More
977 Words | 4 Pages

Alexander the Great is one of the most famous people in our world’s history. He achieved great challenges no other man could do. Alexander himself said, “There is nothing impossible to him who will try.” His achievments prove this quote without a doubt. Alexander of Macedon was born in 356 BCE to King Philip and his wife Olympia.

Read More
900 Words | 4 Pages

In addition, in the Legend of the Hat Band, he rewarded an innocent person who had done a service to him by killing him, showing that he relied so much on the legends that he was willing to kill a loyal soldier because it was thought that he might be a threat. He cared so much about legends that he was willing to sacrifice one of his own men. This does not seem like the act of someone ethical or wise as a great leader should be. A third reason that Alexander should not be considered great is that he used brutal methods to conquer land.

Read More
1171 Words | 5 Pages

Alexander the Great and the Macedonian Empire dominated the ancient world from 336 to 323 B.C. through military force and cultural exchange. The army of Macedonia had achieved an abundance of success due to Alexander's ability to provide his militaries with the best weapons, instill the training needed to perform battle formations and endure battle as well as the attitude needed to overcome adversity such as being outnumbered by the Persians. Despite conquering various lands, Alexander the Great chose not to impose his rule, but rather embrace certain customs, in order to spread Hellenism and eliminate the perception of being foreign; the process of unification impacted western civilization by mixing the people of Macedonia with other conquered

Read More
746 Words | 3 Pages

Describe the steps that Alexander the Great and his mother took to ensure his rise to power. Alexander and his mother took many steps to ensure his power as king of Macedonia. One of the first steps he took was to have a great education. Secondly, Alexander may have gotten his father killed by his bodyguard.

Read More
1530 Words | 7 Pages

After his early death at the age of 33, Alexander left behind a vast empire stretching from Greece to northwestern India. In addition to his empire, however, Alexander also left a lasting impression on the world as a military leader and king. Even today Alexander remains a respected historical character, considering that his military strategies are still used in modern warfare. This paper thus attempts to answer the question what lasting impacts Alexander the Great had on future generations. In doing so this paper will examine three aspects of Alexander the Great: his personality, his military skills and, lastly, the resulting cultural impact of his conquests.

Read More
1783 Words | 8 Pages

In Parallel Lives by Plutarch, he portrays Alexander the Great as an outstanding moral individual and an excellent leader of his people. Although Plutarch illustrates Alexander as a wise, compassionate, and ambitious individual, his defense of Alexander against the people who think of Alexander as a bad leader is weak and inefficient. Plutarch’s defense of Alexander’s fallible qualities, such as his drinking problems and his apathy to his people at the later part of his life is questionable and easily disproved, weakening his argument that Alexander is a truly admirable person. The majority of the beginning of Alexander is dedicated to the description of Alexander’s background and his experiences as he grows up into a mature and ambitious

Read More
445 Words | 2 Pages

Alexander The Great’s title of “The Great” was not an exaggeration. To earn the title of “The Great”, you must've done some extremely good things as your reign as a king, queen, or emperor. Alexander The Great did many great and powerful things during his lifetime. He established an extremely powerful military, and he knew how to strategically conquer land, and he was interested in turning this conquered land into powerful areas.

Read More
1428 Words | 6 Pages

Alexander the Great was the king and renown general of Macedonia. He led the Greek army against Persia and used many bold tactics in battle. Alexander the Great significantly expanded the Greek legacy by conquering territories. When he conquered a territory, he would not force the locals to assimilate into the Greek culture. This is to ensure they would not rebel against his leadership.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Alexander The Great

Related Topics

Open Document