ipl-logo

DBQ On Alexander The Great

527 Words3 Pages

Alexander the Great Alexander the Great, a powerful leader, is one of the most famous people in history. Alexander the Great was born in 356 BCE in a kingdom of Greece called Macedonia. Alexander inherited the kingdom at 20 years old when his father, King Philip, was assassinated. This left Alexander to conquer and expand his empire. (BGE) Was Alexander the Great really great? Based on his remarkable achievement, leadership, and concern for others, Alexander the Great was great. Alexander was great for his large empire, his influence, and his generosity to others. One reason that Alexander was great is his large empire. At just the age of 20, Alexander set off to conquer Persia. To do this he had to fight through many lands controlled by …show more content…

When Alexander and his men were marching across the army, his men gave him a helmet full of water specifically for him. “Alexander, with a word of thanks for the gift, took the helmet and, in full view of his troops, poured the water on the ground.” (Doc D). Alexander also allowed many cities to surrender without a fight, and treated the cities that did rather kindly (Doc C). Alexander pouring the water explains why he was great because even though his men had given him water, he refused to drink it, for his men were just as thirsty as he was. Allowing the cities to surrender explains why he was great because it shows that he wasn’t a harsh leader that just seizes control, he lets the city decide to surrender in return for kindness. In conclusion, Alexander the Great was a strong, skilled leader. Alexander the Great did show some qualities of a bad leader. For example, when a sailor found Alexander’s hat that had fell into the water, Alexander ordered his head to be cut off because “he should not allow the head that had worn the royal head band to be safe.” (Doc D). However, Alexander the Great’s empire, influence, and generosity to others do show that overall, Alexander the Great was an amazing

Show More
Related
781 Words | 4 Pages

He then set off and conquered Egypt, the Persian Empire, and won a hard battle against India before his troops forced him to return home. Alexander then died at the age of 32. Most people see Alexander as Great because he conquered a lot of land, built a massive empire, and was a military genius, but Alexander was not so great. Alexander the Great did not deserve his title as Great because he gained his power by fear, killed innocent

Read More
509 Words | 3 Pages

Throughout history, there has been great military leaders come and go. Although, one of the most well-known conquerors is Alexander the Great. Many people thought he was a good leader and a good king. However, the people he conquered think otherwise. The people who supported him say he was compassionate towards others.

Read More
677 Words | 3 Pages

He was not great because he didn’t show concern for others, leadership, or intelligence. Alexander the Great was not the best because of his mass amounts of murder, not much care for his soldiers, and his poor ability to lead. The first reason Alexander the Great is not amazing because of the mass amount of murder he committed. One example is during the battle at Tyre, once Alexander’s army broke into the city they went on a ferocious killing spree (Doc C). Alexander had ordered anyone that was not inside the temple to be slain and he killed seven thousand Tyrians.

Read More
381 Words | 2 Pages

Did you know that Alexander the Great was one of the greatest conquers? Alexander was born in 358 B.C. and he lived in a kingdom in Greece called Macedonia. Alexander was the son of the King Phillip II, and Alexander became king. During his life, did Alexander show enough leadership, courage, and concern for others to be considered great? By these measures, Alexander was great for at least three reasons: military genius, inspiring leader, and spread of Greek cultures.

Read More
471 Words | 2 Pages

Alexander the Great was not great because of his disrespect for others. His Greek officers left him for a village of Hindu Kush people ( Doc F). This demonstrates that if Alexander was so great then why would his officers just leave him unless he did something that made them feel disrespected or feel uncomfortable. Alexander killed trained elephants

Read More
977 Words | 4 Pages

(Green, document C). Alexander may have just destroyed a city for his empire, but he showed concern by sparing the lives of those who took refuge. This proves that Alexander shows concern because the least he could do in the situation was make sure the victims were okay, and he did that. He spared the lives of the victims who took refuge. Clearly, there are reasons Alexander could be considered not great, but he shows outstanding qualities that prove

Read More
818 Words | 4 Pages

Without their trust, Alexander would not have achieved as much as he did. These examples show that Alexander was great because they provided insight into what Alexander achieved. He had to work hard to gain the people’s trust. It all paid off when he was able to say that he was the greatest leader of his time. Today, everyone wants a trustworthy leader.

Read More
688 Words | 3 Pages

The tactics he used to confuse the enemy greatly contributed to his success. His ability to protect his people was a skill that would make or break his success. Without these tactics and strategies, the people who he conquered would be way more hesitant toward him because they weren’t guaranteed safety. When he was in battle against Porus, he moved and organized his army to confuse him (Document B). He was a great tactician by moving his army in a way to confuse the enemy.

Read More
286 Words | 2 Pages

The statement Friar Lawrence made about the “two opposing camps” of good and evil in all living things is very true not only in this story, but in life as well. Anything can have two sides, both good and bad. In the book, we see many different perspectives shown from different people and events. Mercutio was shown to be gentle, kind, and peaceful, never liked to get into fights or arguments with the Capulets was later caught up in a fight with Tybalt in which he was killed.

Read More
1171 Words | 5 Pages

Alexander the Great and the Macedonian Empire dominated the ancient world from 336 to 323 B.C. through military force and cultural exchange. The army of Macedonia had achieved an abundance of success due to Alexander's ability to provide his militaries with the best weapons, instill the training needed to perform battle formations and endure battle as well as the attitude needed to overcome adversity such as being outnumbered by the Persians. Despite conquering various lands, Alexander the Great chose not to impose his rule, but rather embrace certain customs, in order to spread Hellenism and eliminate the perception of being foreign; the process of unification impacted western civilization by mixing the people of Macedonia with other conquered

Read More
746 Words | 3 Pages

Describe the steps that Alexander the Great and his mother took to ensure his rise to power. Alexander and his mother took many steps to ensure his power as king of Macedonia. One of the first steps he took was to have a great education. Secondly, Alexander may have gotten his father killed by his bodyguard.

Read More
1216 Words | 5 Pages

Alexander of Macedon and Charlemagne of the Franks have been tagged as “the Great.” Alexander the Great during the fourth century transformed Greece from Hellenic to Hellenistic era. He was nicknamed as ‘the Great’ because of his conquests that made his empire become the largest in the ancient world. His empire was spread throughout Greece, Persia, and Egypt. Centuries later, a man named Charles the Great ruled France for 40 years.

Read More
1530 Words | 7 Pages

Glorious men have graced the earth and have left significant impressions on the following generations. Alexander the Great suits that profile like none other. As arguably one of the most influential military leaders in history, Alexander conquered the majority of the known world, including large-scale empires such as the Persian. Succeeding his father, Philip II, to the throne at the age of 20, Alexander commanded an already skilled military, which he schooled further in the beginning of his reign. Even militarily significant empires had no chance against Alexander 's military brilliance and so he constructed one of the largest empires in history.

Read More
445 Words | 2 Pages

Alexander The Great’s title of “The Great” was not an exaggeration. To earn the title of “The Great”, you must've done some extremely good things as your reign as a king, queen, or emperor. Alexander The Great did many great and powerful things during his lifetime. He established an extremely powerful military, and he knew how to strategically conquer land, and he was interested in turning this conquered land into powerful areas.

Read More
1428 Words | 6 Pages

Alexander the Great was the king and renown general of Macedonia. He led the Greek army against Persia and used many bold tactics in battle. Alexander the Great significantly expanded the Greek legacy by conquering territories. When he conquered a territory, he would not force the locals to assimilate into the Greek culture. This is to ensure they would not rebel against his leadership.

Read More

More about DBQ On Alexander The Great

Related Topics

Open Document