ipl-logo

Alexander The Great Dbq

688 Words3 Pages

Alexander the Great was a successful leader and tactician. Even though he was successful in these departments, we don’t see much of his politician skills being used. Alexander the Great, born in the northern kingdom of Greece, Macedonia, is easily one of the most famous people in history. Known for conquering most of what they knew as the world, Alexander accomplished a lot. From leadership, to tactics he used in battle, Alexander the Great was a successful man. Alexander was successful as a leader. While being a leader, you have to think of the way others feel and not just your personal needs. “...Alexander with a word of thanks for the gift, took the helmet and in full view of his troops, poured it on the ground”(Document D). The text …show more content…

The tactics he used to confuse the enemy greatly contributed to his success. His ability to protect his people was a skill that would make or break his success. Without these tactics and strategies, the people who he conquered would be way more hesitant toward him because they weren’t guaranteed safety. When he was in battle against Porus, he moved and organized his army to confuse him (Document B). He was a great tactician by moving his army in a way to confuse the enemy. This was a smart move to do because moving his army around gave him more time to defeat the enemy. When in battle, you have to use quick thinking to win. A great tactician uses tactics like this to win over the enemy. We can see Alexander doing this in many …show more content…

The impact he left emotionally on the people was very important. “He conquered the world and was a very great man, brave and dauntless and was generous to his followers.” (Document F). The evidence presented shows the character of Alexander. We can see the impact he left on the people. The writer describes Alexander dauntless and brave which shows the person he presented himself to be. His people/social skills were just as important as his tactician or leader skills. How he acted contributed to his success just as much if not more than his leader and tactician

Show More
Related
881 Words | 4 Pages

He was determined to uphold his fathers dream and take control of Persia. Alexander was considered strategic in his battles and wasn’t scared to go first before his army into war. His appreciation and sympathy for religion and his troops is what makes him such a heroic leader. By these

Read More
358 Words | 2 Pages

He even started Hellenism. The leader alexander was great cause many things one he started leading when he was 20. He also learned from Aristotle one of wise minds of there time. He conquered the known world in 7 years and he had a loyal army, which stood by him in every battle. He was great leader who couldn’t be rivaled and wouldn’t be satisfied till he conquered the world.

Read More
650 Words | 3 Pages

Alexander the Great is a superior leader based on the fact that he gave the people great rich lives during his rule. Alexander the Great was a great military leader along with his life and legacy. The great Alexander’s early life was one filled with death and controlling figures.

Read More
570 Words | 3 Pages

Alexander set out to conquer the Persian Empire. First he conquered Greece and later Egypt and India. His many accomplishments are what make him famous. Alexander the Great was a hero. His heroism included his generosity to the people he conquered, he respected and appreciated their cultures, and he was determined and strong.

Read More
898 Words | 4 Pages

Alexander the Great is considered one of the most brilliant military commanders and rulers in history. I believe this view is correct. Alexander took part in many battles throughout his reign, and though his troops faced overwhelming numbers many times, he remained undefeated in every

Read More
574 Words | 3 Pages

Alexander the Great. Alexander the great was a student of Aristotle as well as a military genius. One of Alexander’s biggest achievements was defeating King Darius III. Alexander the Great held high moral standards because he fought for what he believed and always tried his best to do what was right.

Read More
432 Words | 2 Pages

Alexander the Great is a subject of contorversy. Some historians say he was a great and noble leader while others say he was a ruthless conqueror. Alexander came into power after his father died, who was not a great ruler himself. So Alexander really had to prove he could be an honorable king. I believe that Alexander was a great ruler because he was tolerant of other religions, he expanded his empires ecomonics, and he showed a certain brilliance when it came to conquoring.

Read More
624 Words | 3 Pages

Alexander the Great is still revered today for his large-scale conquer of the known world, this success can be linked to his most important trait. Alexander’s determination was what allowed him to be so successful both on and off the battlefield. The event that prompted Alexander’s world conquer was when he became king of Macedonia in the year 336 BC. Alexander’s starting point was the empire that his father had built up before his death. By using both similar strategies as his father and his own determination, Alexander expanded the already successful empire.

Read More
474 Words | 2 Pages

As well as that Alexander was a military genius, who unlike many other kings and emperors he “...did not set out to rampage and ravage foreign cities "to demonstrate his ability to reign"...” rather he took on different foreign customs and traditions, which is what made his empire so successful unlike many empires before him. On top of this he respected the countries and cities of which he conquered and always letting the people have a say in politics. Alexander increased trade and communication between the East and and West and various other areas, as well as revealing Greek culture to the world. It can be said that the people of Greek finally thought they had a place in the world. He is an important figure also because his legacy lives on even today, he transformed cities, cultures, people and art.

Read More
453 Words | 2 Pages

Alexander's vision of a united empire where diverse cultures coexisted demonstrates his outstanding leadership skills and ability to bridge different

Read More
1000 Words | 4 Pages

As the successor to Philip II and Great King of a vast empire, Alexander must have possessed aspects that qualify him for his noble position. Based on Plutarch’s account of Alexander, he was intelligent and had the utmost respect for knowledge; his appreciation of philosophy lasted throughout his life and his intelligence made him capable of making the decisions of a king. Alexander also seemed to have had an arrogance fit for his status. Alexander’s haughtiness, although it often does land him in heated situations, also strengthens his confidence as a leader. His leadership capabilities began at a young age, and its extent is reflected by the immensity of the Macedonian empire by the end of his reign.

Read More
652 Words | 3 Pages

Alexander demanded that people blend cultures against their will, punished civilizations that refused to surrender and tricked people into thinking that he cared about his army. Some say he was involved in his own father’s death because Alexander wanted the crown. He did horrific things in order to succeed earning him the common title “Alexander the Great.” People would stop calling him by this false name if they knew the real roots of Alexander’s story. All in all, some people might think that Alexander was a great leader, but his greatness is actually a

Read More
413 Words | 2 Pages

I believe that Alexander the Great was a very good leader. He had the attributes many leaders would love to have. Attributes including his personality, war style, and intelligence. He was certaintly destined to be aa leader and on top of it all, a great and influencing leader that has ever been mentioned in history. In the next paragraph we will see exactly what I speak about, the evidence one cannot deny.

Read More
525 Words | 3 Pages

One of the most significant reasons why Alexander the Great is a captivating figure in history is his remarkable military achievements. At the age of only 20, Alexander became the king of Macedonia, and he quickly set his sights on conquering

Read More
761 Words | 4 Pages

Even though he had the advantage of numbers, he and his men were not doing well fighting on the river valley, mountains and the sea on both of his sides. However, Alexander used his trusted phalanx formation, which worked. Alexander and his army turned toward the Persians and spotted Darius. Darius fled the battle in his chariot and then finally continued on horseback. When the Persians saw their leader flee, they followed.

Read More

More about Alexander The Great Dbq

Related Topics

Open Document