Alexander Wendt's Social Theory of International Politics proposes a theory that places great importance on the role of identity, shared ideas and norms in defining state behaviour. He theorises a structural and idealist worldview which contrasts with the individualism and materialism that underpins much of the mainstream international relations theories. As I explore the gist of Wendt's book, I will attempt to summarise the key findings, contributions to International Relations and to a certain extent, the limitations of Wendt's theory. Wendt is critical to both liberal and realist approaches that emphasises materialist and individualistic motivations for state actions while discounting identity, norms and shared values. As put forth by Wendt, the world is not a self-help system but an international landscape which is created and re-created through processes of …show more content…
Wendt's, Anarchy is what States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics' main argument, ‘A world in which identities and interests are learned and sustained by inter-subjectively grounded practice, by what states think and do, is one in which “anarchy is what states make of it”'. Wendt has much refined his argument since this book but the assertion on how international relations are conducted is not a given but socially constructed remains fundamental.} Hence positive identification with like-minded states will eventually lead to perceiving security threats as a collective concern for all states rather than a private issue for each state. Depending on how well developed the collective self is, it will produce security practices that are in varying degrees altruistic or prosocial\footnote{(ibid.: