The Courage of Cowardice
Two things humans often view to be the opposite are being a coward and being courageous. However, in war, they may be more similar than at first glance. In All Quiet on the Western Front, written by Erich Maria Remarque, the First World War rages throughout Europe in its final years. The war is wreaking havoc on the soldiers and civilians. One of the German soldiers, Paul, is on the western front along with his comrades who are like family. For Paul, it is necessary to be courageous to survive the terror and be cowardly to find a balance: Not to be too brazen to make foolish decisions. In All Quiet on the Western Front, the author reveals that survival in war requires courageousness, but that cowardliness can also be
…show more content…
The ruthless killing brings a toll on the people who will remember that the enemies are men just like them, as Paul does when he instantly regrets his actions, saying that he would not kill him if he could redo the situation. Thus Paul sees value in being a coward, as he thinks it would be more courageous not to kill him than to go by the standards he learns. The German soldiers train as if they were animals acting upon their instincts to do so, which bears similarity to the human nature of war. Paul is at the stage where he lacks any hope for the war and does not see the light at the end of the tunnel. It is in the winter and at the time when Paul is so accustomed to the war that it is just another day for him. Paul reaches this stage when he returns to the front after staying at the hospital due to a leg injury. In a moment of deep thought, Paul ponders, “...life is simply one continual watch against the menace of death;--It has transformed us into unthinking animals to give us the weapon of instinct...“ (Remarque 273-274). The soldiers may be courageous for their spontaneous acts but are thoughtless, controlled creatures. In this case, it is a negative as they are sacrificing their wits to