ipl-logo

Medea Altruistic Infanticide

989 Words4 Pages

MEDEA: THE ABANDONED “…You must know the stress and fear I have being unable to offer even water to my children” (Eripides, 2015, p.27) To be able to analyze Medea’s motives in the play, one must understand the biological and psychological reasons leading to altruistic infanticide. According to Sara G. West, a Doctor from the Department of Psychiatry in Ohio, Altruistic filicide is defined as the crime where parents kill their children because either the world is too cruel for them or because they are suffering from an incurable disease (West, 2015, Para.10). It is not easy to analyze altruistic infanticide due to its antithetical nature. It is antithetical because murder is considered a horrible act born out of hatred yet the reason behind …show more content…

On the contrary, it rather looks as an argument against them seeing that even animals love and protect their children while these two heartless women did not. In order to understand the connection, let’s strip society of its civilization and human intelligence, and, hence, go back to how animals behave. For example, Cat owners know that in many situations, the mother cat, though very protective of her kittens and hostile towards anyone coming near them, might end up killing and sometimes eating her own kittens. Horrifying as it may sound, this phenomenon is observed in many animals such as lions, bears, rats and many more (Morell, 2014, Para.12). Reasons for such actions vary drastically from wanting to increase reproductive opportunities to reducing the competition for natural resources (Taylor, 2012, Para.3). However, the most common incentive for infanticide among animals was found to be the altruistic infanticide: when the mother fears for the safety of her offspring due to another predator attack, she might resolve to end their lives. By killing them, the mother saves the lives of herself and the older and stronger children (Taylor, 2012, Para.13). It is ironic when journalist Virginia Morell, concludes that about animals’ behavior: “As reasonable as these decisions sound, there's still something profoundly upsetting about the deed—so much so that even biologists used to regard it as a pathological behaviour”, especially that humans are committing infanticide as well (Morell, 2014,

Show More
Related

Rhetorical Analysis Of Rachel Carson's 'Biologist'

267 Words | 2 Pages

Biologist, Rachel Carson, in her book Silent Springs discusses a growing issue of uneducated individuals harming and even killing various animals. Carson’s purpose is to convey the idea that individuals need to educate themselves before making rash decisions that can affect countless other species. She employs oblivious diction in order to appeal similar feelings and opinions in her environmentalist readers. Rachel Carson initiates her excerpt of Silent Springs by describing in exquisite detail an incident occurring in Southern Indiana which negatively impaired multiple innocent species. She appeals to her caring audience by concluding that the rash crimes committed by the farmers were intended to “eradicate” the creature, purely because the

Read More

Jeremy Rifkin A Change Of Heart About Animals Analysis

205 Words | 1 Pages

Jeremy Rifkin, the president of the Foundation on Economic Trends in Washington D.C and author of “A Change of Heart About Animals” (2003), argues in this article that animals are much more like humans than we thought and that we should expand our empathy to our fellow creatures. Rifkin develops his thesis by comparing the similarities between humans and animals. An example of this is in paragraph 11 when he claims that animals show a sense of their own mortality and the mortality of their kin just like humans do. He supports this claim by giving an example of elephants standing next to their dead children for days after they have passed. The author gives that example of the elephants in order to make the reader understands just how aware these

Read More

Case Of Susan Smith Of South Carolina By Andrea Yates

867 Words | 4 Pages

This chapter opens with the account of Susan Smith of South Carolina, and of Andrea Yates of Texas. In both cases, these women took the lives of their children. Smith strapped her two young sons into their car seats and drove her car into a lake. Yates drowned her five children in the family bath tub. Smith in particular paints a gruesome picture in my mind.

Read More

Care Harm Foundation: Observation And Moral Appraisals

64 Words | 1 Pages

I first explain what Care/Harm foundation is before I give my observations, moral interpretations, and connections. Haidt says how cold-blooded reptiles are cold-hearted as the majority of reptiles bet that few offspring will survive as they give birth to many offsprings just to leave their offsprings to their fate. Mammals, however, make sure that their offsprings reach adulthood as they take care of them.

Read More

Rachel Carson Silent Spring Rhetorical Analysis

518 Words | 3 Pages

When looking at that specific phrase it’s clear to the reader that Carson is insinuating that killing is becoming a habit of humanity, an idea that while may be true, isn’t usually made outright. Carson defies normal standards and isn’t afraid to confidently share her own opinion. In the sentence “[Animals] were doomed by a judge and jury who neither knew of their existence nor cared,” Carson continues to set a cynical backdrop that depicts humanity as evil. Now, while her tone may not be able to single handedly convince people to change their opinions, what it does do instead is contributes towards her claim that this is an irrefutable problem that requires decisive action. Her tone does this by inciting emotion into the reader.

Read More

Summary Of Singer's Good Farm By Michael Pollan

886 Words | 4 Pages

Michael Pollan brings to our attention the arguments that relate to the treatment of animals. He begins his essay with examples talking about how pigs are seen as nothing more than meat and how dogs get their own birthday and Christmas presents. Here he questions how certain animals receive different attitudes from us and makes us think about how each animal has a different fate. Pollan wants us to question ourselves and to look at animals from another perspective and see if they deserve more equality or if we need to have a different attitude towards them all together. These arguments are very effective in that they make us question of whether or not our attitude towards certain animals are different because of how they are used or in our eyes some are just more important than others.

Read More

Bonnie Steinbock's Argument Analysis

782 Words | 4 Pages

In this paper, I will focus on Bonnie Steinbock’s claim on whether or not we should give equal moral consideration to species outside our own species group. I will first determine what moral concern means, according to Peter singer, and explain how he views the human treatment of animals. I will then outline Steinbock’s argument against Singer’s position and explain how her criticism is part of a much broader issue: that is moral concern. I will finally make my argument against Steinbock as well as address any issues she could possibly raise against my argument. Peter Singer believed that all species, whether it be human or non-human, deserve equal consideration of interests and quality of life.

Read More

John T. Noonan's An Almost Absolute Value In Human History

294 Words | 2 Pages

It the undeveloped human happened to survive without her the mother has no right to then take the humans life. This theory is reflected in her text

Read More

Harman's Arguments Against Killing Animals

497 Words | 2 Pages

According to Elizabeth Harman, an action that kills an animal even painlessly, is an action that harms the animal. If we indeed have strong moral reasons against causing pain to animals, Harman argues we must also have strong moral reasons against killing animals. This raises an objection to the Surprising Claim, which states that we have strong reasons against causing intense pain to animals, but only weak reasons against killing animals. The First View claims that killing an animal deprives it of a positive benefit (future life) but does not harm the animal.

Read More

Medea Revenge Quotes

946 Words | 4 Pages

In the beginning everything was fine Medea and her family were welcomed with open arms but it was until Jason had left them and the house was filled with hatred because Medea was upset that he had left after all that she had done for him. She refused to eat , she stood in her room, cried the days away , sometimes she would call out for her father, her country and her home: all abandoned and betrayed for a man who now abandons her, betrays her honor and her love ( pg 6, line 32-34 ). So now she wants personal revenge to punish him for his actions only to get the delight that revenge brings to herself. Jason left from Medea ‘for a royal bed’ is said by the ( pg, line 22 ) which shows the audience to look at Jason as a selfish man. Medea did

Read More

Medea Rhetorical Analysis

559 Words | 3 Pages

Upon first reading this play, emotions of anger, disappointment, and relief swirled to the surface. The fact that Medea was to escape without any consequences angered me so much, but as I thought about it more, my emotions began to shift. It wasn’t as if Medea murdering her children was something she wanted to do. She had to have gone through so much to push her to that point. How can I better justify her actions and relate it to a 21st century audience?

Read More

Anne Bradstreet's Before The Birth Of Her Children

454 Words | 2 Pages

Women in the 1600’s: A Fetching View into the Psyche of Anne Bradstreet “Before the Birth of One of Her Children” is a poem that gives an insight into the life of women in the 1600’s. The poet through her recounting shows no hesitation about the idea of delivering her sprog to term.

Read More

Is Medea Innocent Or Guilty

120 Words | 1 Pages

I am Jason, the former husband of Medea. As the hero of the Golden Fleece, I was once married to a barbarian witch who was also the princess of Colchis. There are no good reasons to take my ex wife 's, Medeas side and defend her for the crimes she has committed. Medea is simply an inadequate person. She comes from a barbaric family that practices dark acts, she does not care about other people 's lives, and she killed our beloved children without a second thought.

Read More

Literary Analysis: Medea By Euripides

1497 Words | 6 Pages

Can the murderess, Medea, be justified for the killing of her own offspring? Medea is a play written by Euripides in the year 431 B.C. and basically is a tragic Greek mythological play that deals with themes such as love, marriage, betrayal and revenge. Summing it up, this play specifically is about how Medea is sent into exile due to Creon (the king) feeling threatened by her. He is feeling threatened by her because Jason (Medea’s husband) took another bride to bed which happened to be the king’s daughter.

Read More

Medea Quote Analysis

1434 Words | 6 Pages

Medea has already lost her husband and her home so this decision is an obvious one for her. She wants to leave everyone in the same misery that she has been experienced and continues to experience. After this, she even plans to murder her own children just to distress Jason further. Medea knows that she will live in regret and misery by doing so, but her need to sadden Jason trumps her own future feelings. The murder of her sons also symbolizes the death of her marriage with Jason.

Read More

More about Medea Altruistic Infanticide

Related Topics

Open Document