In Liz Addison’s rebuttal to Rick Perlstein’s comment that “college as America used to understand it is coming to an end” she argues that the quality of college is not determined by the amount of years and it still matters just as much as it did before. She uses personal anecdotes and a sense of ethos to gain her readers’ trust and reach their emotions. These strategies assist in proving that her claim is credible. Addison talks about her college experience and how community college compares to a four-year college. Her goal is to persuade her readers that community colleges have great value in preparing students for attending a four-year university. “The philosophy of the community college.is one that unconditionally allows its students to …show more content…
Overall, Addison's persuasive essay effectively conveys the value of community college in preparing students for success at a four-year university. The author also proves her claim that community colleges still hold such value through the use of pathos. She emphasizes that she hopes for everyone to find good education and describes community college as “America’s public service gem.” Liz Addison informs her audience about her empathy for others and says that she would campaign for every campus “simply to make sure that anyone who is looking to go to college in this country knows where to find one.” She takes the time to make students heard and seen, because typically, community college is not looked upon as a high education. The author also points out that “When Mr. Perlstein and friends say college no longer holds importance, they mourn for both the individual and society.” What Addison means by this is that by saying community college is not valuable is equivalent to saying that university does not hold value, since college is the building blocks for students in preparation to transfer to a four-year