ipl-logo

Amityville Hospital And Dr Spencer Case Summary

732 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Vicarious Liability case study

Essay Question 1
The legal relationship between hospitals and physicians is very complicated. In this case with Amityville Hospital and Dr. Spencer. The hospital is being sued by patient’s estate after a settlement is made with doctor for unlawful death damages. When a hospital hires a doctor as a contractor or employee they must meet certain hospital-mandated criteria to give physicians privileges as independent contractors or as employees. Usually, this includes the right to admit and treat patients in the hospital. Because most hospital hire doctors as independent contractor they are generally not liable for the negligence of the independent contractors, however, since the employing entity does not control the means and methods of the work to be accomplished by the independent contractors they may do as they see fit. This situation lends too many strengths and weakness in this case that Amityville can use in their defense of the estate clam.
Amityville’s strengths in this case is the hospital had no control over what the physician did or does and it not have the power to limit or suspend the privileges of the doctor. Meaning the hospital gave all the responsibility and the control to the physician so it would be less liable for the doctor’s faults. This situation would take vicarious liability off of the hospital and placing blame on the doctor who did the actual procedure on the patient. Another strength that the hospital can argue in its defense that the doctor was an independent contractor contracted to do work for the hospital. For instance, in case …show more content…

Hospitals can be sued for medical mal practice when they grant privileges to doctors that are not competent to perform procedure and failure to prevent patient form harm or death. This was the result that leading the estate to file claim against Amityville hospital for unlawful death

Show More
Related
1153 Words | 5 Pages

Case Citation: Gallagher v. Cayuga Medical Center 151 AD 3d 1349 - NY: Appellate Div., 3rd Dept. 2017 Background: In this civil case Timothy W. Gallagher is the appellant, and Cayuga Medical Center (CMC) is the respondents. The case took place in the appellate division of the supreme court of New York, division three. The plaintiff’s complaint was that Cayuga Medical Center had asserted medical malpractice, negligence, wrongful death and emotional distressed.

Read More
2124 Words | 9 Pages

Medical Malpractice Case Study Karen Gonzalez Southern New Hampshire University The case of Smith vs. Haugland and the Iowa Heart and Vascular Clinic is a medical malpractice case in which the parties involved include the plaintiffs, a woman named Louetta Smith and her husband Richard and the defendant, a cardiologist named Dr. Frank Haugland and the clinic in which he practiced, the Iowa Heart and Vascular Care Clinic. The plaintiffs sued for malpractice after the defendant performed a procedure on Louetta in which she had complications and irreversible life changing harm. The plaintiffs believed that the defendant performed an unnecessary procedure and that he did not obtain an informed consent. Louetta Smith was 76 years

Read More
280 Words | 2 Pages

The complete lack of respect for the Hospital, the Hospital’s counsel, this Court, and the Rules of Civil Procedure shown by blatantly ignoring valid discovery requests for more than six months and this Court’s Order for more than two months indicate a willful disregard that require sanctions. Accordingly, the sanctions sought by the Hospital are necessary and are not excessive. Indeed, the Hospital requests that the Court give Defendant one more chance to meet his discovery obligations and comply with an order of this Court before the imposition of a default judgment in the Hospital’s favor.

Read More
2595 Words | 11 Pages

Because, statute providing that every contract by which anyone is restrained from exercising lawful profession, trade, or business of any kind is to that extent void, protects person's ability to negotiate and contract for future employment while under contract which attempts to prohibit such conduct. N.D.C.C / 9-08-06.Spectrum Emergency Care, Inc v. St. Joseph's Hosp. And Health Center, 1992 N.W.2d 848. In the case of Spectrum Emergency Care, Inc. v. St. Joseph's Hosp. and Health Center, emergency room physician supplier sued physicians whom it formerly employed and hospital which hired them, alleging that this hiring violated restrictive covenants of with hospital and physicians.

Read More
1368 Words | 6 Pages

The patient had a prior relationship with the physician, as he had been her treating OBGYN with her son (Neyman v. Doshi, 2017).

Read More
785 Words | 4 Pages

The case I will be concentrating on is Tomcik vs. Ohio Dep’t of Rehabilitation and Correction in which Tomcik was imprisoned under the custody of Department of Rehabilitation and correction, based on the Legal and Ethical Issues for Health Professionals book. The problem stimulated from continuous negligence from nurses and doctors at the department, which initially was when Tomcik received a physical evaluation, included the breast examination by Dr. Evans who stated that the examination was cursory and lasted only a few seconds, which means that not much attention was presented regarding the patient and his job. The next day Tomcik noticed a lump as being about the size of a pea in her right breast, however it was not reported by Dr. Evans.

Read More
1502 Words | 7 Pages

From a personal examination of the claim, the ruling of the case was not satisfactory because an examination of the actions undertaken by the parent company would have proved that physicians were still accepting kickbacks. The laws should be amended to include all actions undertaken by the parent or subsidiary companies. The strict nature of the law will reduce cases involving

Read More
639 Words | 3 Pages

It It f It frustrates me what Dr. Anna Pou had to go through with the lawsuits of the Memorial Medical Center incident. As Healthcare professionals, being sued for making the rightful decision for the patient and the hospital is unjust. Healthcare professionals like Dr. Pou, have taken the Hippocratic oath, and one of the promises made within that oath is “first, do no harm”. Hospital’s should not be so quick to make such an important decision of pressing charges to their faculty; more trust should be placed in them. In addition, she made it clear her intentions were just to ‘‘help’’ patients ‘‘through their pain,’’ on national television.

Read More
466 Words | 2 Pages

Paradise Hill Medical Center – Case analysis 1. Recognize the background: the key of this step is to understand the medical issues involved. The medical issue in the Paradise Hill Medical Center (PHMC) was that 22 oncology patients received excessive doses of radiation therapy. The patients have not been informed yet that they received and overdose of radiation. The CEO alleged that it was the responsibility of the medical staff to inform the affected patients, and the medical team decided not to inform them about the error.

Read More
1368 Words | 6 Pages

Health Care Law: Tort Case Study Carolann Stanek University of Mary   Health Care Law: Tort Case Study A sample case study reviewed substandard care that was delivered to Ms. Gardner after having sustained an accident and brought to Bay Hospital for treatment. Dr. Dick, a second-year pediatric resident, was on that day in the ED and provided care for Ms. Gadner. Dr. Moon, is the chief of staff and oversees the credentialing of all physicians at Bay Hospital.

Read More
1010 Words | 5 Pages

The physician also risks not getting paid by the insurance company if they do not administer the less expensive treatment. This conflict could also be

Read More
1010 Words | 5 Pages

The court found the “Defendant's care of Claimant fell below acceptable standards of practice” (Stashenko, 2015). In 2009 a former inmate of the Hawaii corrections department was awarded close to $1 million in damages for an incident in 2003, in which the physician’s failure to give the correct type and dosage of antibiotic for an infection in his scrotum. This resulted in 6 subsequent surgeries and the removal of his scrotum, rendering him

Read More
542 Words | 3 Pages

In the case of Donald (Dax) Cowart, one can determine that the conflict is between Beneficence and Autonomy. The doctors were morally right in choosing to treat Donald despite his autonomy by using the principle of beneficence. Firstly, doctors entire training is about how to save lives, so in a sense it is something they are morally obligated to do. Patients go to hospital in the hopes of being treated.

Read More
1567 Words | 7 Pages

The malpractice claims for that hospital went down by 70 percent in comparison to hospitals that acted as a control who only saw a 3 percent decrease. That’s a pretty big benefit for any facility, but this also offers a great deal of benefits for individual physicians, as well. No one wants to go through the situation of dealing with a malpractice suit, and this is a great benefit. There are more benefits to be gained.

Read More
700 Words | 3 Pages

Healthcare professionals mostly adopt patient rights, covering such matters as access to care, patient dignity, confidentiality, and consent to treatment.

Read More

More about Amityville Hospital And Dr Spencer Case Summary

Related Topics

Open Document