ipl-logo

An Analysis Of Charlie Gordon's Doctors 'Ethical'

450 Words2 Pages
Ava Eaton
Ms.Putman
Hour 4
15 November 2016
Argument Essay
Ethics are the standards of right and wrong. Ethics usually have good reasoning behind them. Ethics are applied in many things, and especially used in the medical field. Charlie is a thirty-seven year old man who has a low IQ of 68. Scientists want to perform a procedure on Charlie to increase his intelligence. Charlie Gordon 's doctors did not act ethically when they performed the surgery to make him smarter.
Charlie Gordon 's doctors did not act ethically when performing this procedure, because they did the operation for selfish reasons. The doctors wanted to be famous, and get attention for being the first to perform this operation. Also one of the doctors wives was
Show More
Related
544 Words | 3 Pages

For my HarpWeek discussion I chose to look at Gordon Under Medical Inspection. Gordon Under Medical Inspection depicts a drawing of a runaway slave getting a medical examination after having successfully escaped from the north to the south. The main focal point of the drawing are the many scares that are present on the man's back. These scares are more than likely the results of having been wiped and beaten by his previous slave owner who he had escaped from. I feel that the artist was trying to portray the cruelty of slavery, and that by showing the many scares on the runaway slaves back it is supposed to invoke a reaction of pity for the man who had been abused, and thus humanizing him in the eyes of the people.

Read More
1033 Words | 5 Pages

The choice of using Charlie Gordon in Daniel Keyes’ book, Flowers for Algernon, for an intelligence altering surgery was unethical and biased. The first reason that Charlie should not have been chosen for the surgery is that it left him and his life in worse condition than when before the surgery. “ I dont want Miss Kinnian to feel sorry for me. Evry body feels sorry at the factery and I dont want that eather

Read More
486 Words | 2 Pages

Charlie Gordon is a none smart, caring person, living in New York. He has a desirer to be smart and fit in with the world around him. He is 37 years old, with an IQ of 68. Two doctors get him though a surgery to make him smart. They acted un-ethically toward Charlie while going though this preacher.

Read More
311 Words | 2 Pages

Tommy Varhall Miss putman Hour 4 15 november 2016 Argument essay Ethics is the knowledge of something wright or wrong. Charlie Gordon is a 37 year old man who lives in New york and has an IQ of 68 and has been going to class for adults to help him read. He works at a job and gets made fun of and then an opportunity pops up for him to get smart and he accepts and becomes. The doctors only did it so they could get credit and the fame.

Read More
959 Words | 4 Pages

As the experiment takes an impact, Charlie’s knowledge expands until it surpasses that of the doctors who prepared his surgery. The

Read More
363 Words | 2 Pages

A “witch-hunt” happened in America’s history twice. The first time was in the 17th century; the Salem Witch Trials. The second was 200 years later during the 1950s when senator Joseph McCarthy attempted to root out communism from American society. An allegory is a story that can be interpreted on both a literal and a symbolic level. Arthur Miller wrote the play ‘The Crucible’ when he was accused of being a member of the communist party.

Read More
408 Words | 2 Pages

Petrina Arvanitakis Putman Hour 2-4 15 November 2016 Argument Essay Ethics are the acts, behaviors, or motives and if they are 'right or wrong '. In 'flowers for Algernon ' Charlie Gordon is a man who is disabled from low intelligence. Unfortunately, his doctors were not ethical when performing the procedure to make him smarter. Algernon was a small mouse that what a friend of Charlie 's, and he died in the procedure.

Read More
702 Words | 3 Pages

However, after the surgery, Charlie finds intelligence was a nice treat but was far from an importance in life and only took him away from what truly mattered. One could believe Charlie was wrong to undergo the surgery because of the side effects that came with the surgery such as physical and emotional instability, and amnesia, the depresion it came with, and how he lost all of his friends and loved ones with his extreme intelligence. First off, one reason Charlie should not have gotten the surgery is the depression and suicidal thoughts it came with for

Read More
894 Words | 4 Pages

Flowers for Algernon Argumentative essay Intelligence is a valued aspect to many people, but it can be achieved in options that aren’t labeled “intelligence-altering surgery”. The doctors, Dr.Nemur and Dr. Strauss do not follow the ethics of fieldwork. They chose the wrong person, Charlie Gordon, to do the surgery on, and didn’t wait to find out that the side-effects include death. In Flowers for Algernon by Daniel Keyes, the doctors made a bad choice by choosing Charlie Gordon for the intelligence-altering surgery.

Read More
390 Words | 2 Pages

Should Charlie Have Had the Operation “ I want to be smart and I’ll try real hard”. This is Charlie Grodman he is the main character I will be talking about today. He is from the book “Flowers for Algernon” by Daniel Keyes. I will tell you why he should of had the operation. I think that it was substantial for him to get a taste of being normal.

Read More
576 Words | 3 Pages

Although, if Charlie did not have the surgery, he would not have had the experience of becoming super smart. Charlie would agree with me that he did not feel happy with himself that he had the surgery. He decided that he wanted to leave New York because he was so embarrassed about pulling a “Charlie Gordon.” Charlie should not have had the surgery because, before the surgery, he had the motivation to become smart, and after the surgery, he became depressed and realized that the world plus the people in it are

Read More
662 Words | 3 Pages

The doctors failed to use a properly consenting patient, neglected Charlie’s emotional state, and failed to conduct proper research. If Charlie had a caretaker who could give consent on his behalf, similar to a minor, an operation of this sort could be ethical. Moreover, it could be ethical if the doctors’ research and further develop their theory before using a human test subject, and pay close attention to Charlie’s emotional and mental health. However, Charlie’s operation was performed without these precautions and guidelines, and he suffers greatly in the

Read More
1360 Words | 6 Pages

The concept of ethics entails systemizing, justifying, and recommending right and wrong conduct. It involves in practical reasoning: good, right, duty, obligation, virtue, freedom, rationality, and choice. Humanity has questioned this concept of ethics and ‘good’ for as long as it has survived, as it deals with real-life issues such as “what is morally right and wrong?” and “how do people ought to act?”

Read More
1451 Words | 6 Pages

“Ethics”, in an organizational context, comprises a set of behavioral standards, expressed as norms, principles, procedural guides, or rules of behavior, defining what is appropriate (right) and inappropriate(wrong). Grounded in a system of values and moral principles, these behavioral

Read More
1258 Words | 6 Pages

While identity focuses on uniqueness such as how an individual is different from and similar to others, diversity focuses on the range of the difference and uniqueness such as race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, socio-economic status, age, physical abilities, religious beliefs, political beliefs, among others. Diversity should be seen as source of strength. However, it can also be a source of violence, oftentimes by those who fear or dislike difference. In the best light diversity is foundation for peacebuilding – since it enables us to draw strength and be respectful of difference. Identity and diversity are linked.

Read More

More about An Analysis Of Charlie Gordon's Doctors 'Ethical'

Related Topics

Open Document