Part C: Analyse and evaluate representation of history
Representation1
Representation 1 highly shows accurate as it was true that the suffragist and suffragettes appealed to mainly middle and upper class- (middle) class educated women. The dates of the event is true, it’s accuracy has been shown due to the information being taken from the textbook, which gives and expands good content , such as the National League for opposing women suffrage was founded in 1911, which proves to be true.
Representation1, shows how unbiased the context was and that the text was balanced and no fabricated information was copied because it was only the press who reported all the events into the newspaper. It also shows completeness, as although the suffragette
…show more content…
Despite the increasing energy of the suffragette campaign, the government remained unmoved on the issue. This was because if they had let them get their way , the public will see it as an advantage and use violence to get their way , which the government would not allow. Representation 2
Representation 2, shows accuracy because the date of when the even had happened was true(1910, July). This source shows how the suffragettes reacted in their campaign. Many of the events that took place were when the suffragettes had learnt ju-jitsu to defend themselves.
Representation 2, shows biased as the source was taken from the magazine called ‘Punch’. The magazine portrays the policemen as cowards and were extremely scared, which his inaccurate because most of the policemen would’ve defended themselves. The pictures shows only one women taking down a herd of policemen when there would have been more women. This proves biased as many women attacked as whereas the policemen, beating and kicking the women like they were worth