The writer, Matt Lamkin, argues in his essay, A Ban on Brain-Boosting Drugs is not the Answer, that the use of brain enhancing drugs on college campuses is the product of a society that promotes competition in all aspects of life. The purpose of this essay is to propose that colleges and society stop putting an emphasis on test scores and start to promote a better educational experience, through adding the use of brain-boosting drugs to the honor code, instead of banning them all together. Lamkin writes this essay for universities who are looking to ban brain-boosting drugs, so that they may see the potential benefits of only placing it in the honor code so that students can learn to value the importance of not using these drugs. Matt Lamkin’s essay is a well-written argument, in that he uses a rhetorical question and the appeal to emotion to keep the reader enthused in his essay as well as to further enhance his argument. …show more content…
In the essay, Lamkin blames the use of these drugs on the universities and society for placing too much of an emphasis on competition and test taking abilities, and not enough on the actual education. By placing the blame on the universities and society, Lamkin is allowing the readers of this essay to relate and better understand the argument that he is making; because of the competition that many know is so great in the society that we live