Frank Trippett, in his passage “A Red Light For Scofflaws”, is arguing that the people are not following the minor laws because they think it is not important, he support his argument by first explaining how the people are breaking laws and not even thought that it was wrong, he continues by showing how the careless of the people could threaten the people’s lives. The author wrote in critical tone for the Americans who are breaking the minor laws. The author’s argument is right, people should take the minor laws more seriously because people could lose their lives and make other people life in dangerous too. The people do not think that these laws are important, and they are not that big deal because it will not make any different and will not effect anyone, for example, if the government decide to change the speeding in certain area and make it lower, some people will think that this is wrong because they got used to a certain system and they do not want to change it.
Short Summary: Chapter 2 of The Rich Get Richer and the Poor Get Prison was about how the way society sees crime can be distorted by the media, the justice system, and the information we are presented with about what crime really is. It points out that medical neglect, known environmental hazards, dangerous workplace conditions, and poverty cause more injuries yearly than murders, assaults, and robberies. Most people see the latter as “crime,” but not the former. Long Summary: Chapter 2 of The Rich Get Richer and the Poor Get Prison discusses people’s skewed perspective when it comes to what they think crime really is. The reader is asked to do an exercise regarding their own reason.
Many Americans think that they are not considered a lawbreaker but in all reality they really can be. Frank Trippett, in his passage, “A Red Light of Scofflaws”, addresses that, Americans are used to thinking that the law is threatened mainly by violent crime. Trippett supports his argument by presenting that more and more people are casually breaking the law by, littering, speeding, and noise pollution. Tippett creates a firm tone towards lawbreakers and Americans. The author’s argument is valid because most people think they will be able to do what they want without thinking they are doing any wrong.
The author gave many different statistics regarding the unfair legal system in American. As Stevenson puts into his own words, “Today we have the highest rate of incarceration in the world. The prison population has increased from 300,000 people in early 1970s to 2.3 million people today” (Stevenson 15). This shows the reader the numbers of people incarceration has increased.
Introduction: Chapter one of Law in America, author was viewing that everything has a law and must follow the law. author’s example was the newspaper and police officer’s. the law is the only one that people have, commonly separate their idea and the responsibility of the country. Without law people would, solve the people with their idea of vision. The regulation, they must follow what the law says, and to be fair and equal to all the people.
I would be the first to advocate obeying the laws. One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey the laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws. I would agree with St. Augustine that “an unjust law is no law at all.” Dr. King strongly suggests that moral responsibility has a major role in deciding when the appropriate time to challenge the rules is.
Sociologists have determined, the predominant cause of a revolution in the world is poor economic conditions, where people are not able to get adequate income to take care of their bare necessities to feed themselves and make the ends meet. Hence, many resort to illegal activities, particularly in highly populated areas, where massive competition for jobs exists. As can be concluded, it is inevitable that eventually many of the people who commit illegal acts get caught by law enforcement authorities, and subsequently end up in jail. Accordingly, due to the instability of the economic and political growth, many people feel obligated to move elsewhere, not only to seek employment to support their families, but to find a better and safer environment to live in. This shows how resilient American people truly were.
Most people have broken laws that they do not know exist. Whether it is ashing out a window, or playing loud music in public. In the argument by Frank Trippett, he claims that most people do not think of themselves as criminals. He continues and argues that Americans think of law-and-order being threatened in violent ways and not things like littering or sound pollution. He then states that the foundation of social order is shaken up and thrown out of whack when normal citizens ignore the laws.
Martin Luther King Jr. And Thoreau talks about breaking the laws and about the unjust and just laws. Many peoples breaks the laws because of emergency or something that is related close to you. It is strange if you are catch while breaking the laws. “How can you advocate breaking some laws and obeying other?”(Martin Luther King Jr.).
That exact issue sparks the question of why we would ever break the rules. We break rules because we think that the benefits outweigh the costs in the situation we are in. Our mind believes that it’s worth taking the consequences for the satisfaction we are achieving. In today’s society, people break rules for the very reason that they seem unreasonable, deter us
Hobbes, however would disagree and say that people should follow the law no matter the situation. But I think that there are situations they justify defying the government. If people never defying the laws, the colonies would never
The United States’ crime rate has risen over the years but when an 18 year old American teen is found guilty in Asia and is for canning that is when society starts to rebel. The editor for “Time To Assert American Value” believes that rough justice will be to hard on the 18 year old. But in “Rough Justice A Caning in Singapore Stirs Up a Fierce Debate about crime and punishment” believe he got everything coming to him because Singapore show what happens to bad people in foreign countries. In the editorial “Time to Assert American Values,” the editor says that “Singapore’s founding leader, Lee Kuan Yew, returned to a favorite theme yesterday in defending the threatened caning of Michael Fay, an 18-year-old american found guilty of vandalism”
“I’m surprised we haven’t been arrested yet.” I said, “Police these days. ‘Oh, don’t do drugs, kids, but you can totally steal cars and run red lights and stop signs!’’ “You’re the one that’s breaking the law in the first place.” He mused.
A popular slogan of today “You’re a fool if you obey the rules”(A Red Light for Scofflaws). In this excerpt from Frank Trippett’s “A Red Light for Scofflaws”, the author argues that citizens who break ‘minor’ laws should be reprimanded. Trippett goes on by stating that when it comes to these laws an increasing number of citizens are breaking them. Trippett provides observational evidence on why people breaking these laws are in the wrong doing. This excerpt contains a informational tone for the general public that may be ignorant to these ‘minor’ laws.
What I will explain to you in this article will, how we are connected with the law and I hope, make you see sense in the importance of our laws in the society we live in. To be against the importance of laws in our society would show one to be ignorant and naïve. I encounter the law on a daily basis when I am driving. I have to follow the speed limit of each road, I have to signal before changing lanes, my vehicle must be in good condition in order to safely drive and I must obey all road signs as they are set in place to ensure the safety of everybody.
