ipl-logo

Analysis Of Arguments In Favour Of Capital Punishment

801 Words4 Pages

Thesis: The death penalty is a fair form of punishment and should be allowed in all states.
There are extreme regulations that have to be met for the death penalty to be assigned. In countries that institute the death penalty as a form of punishment, it is never given for small cases or even just murder. According to the article, “Arguments in Favour of Capital Punishment”, criminals will not be given an unusual or cruel punishment because it would not make sense to give a huge punishment to a small crime (“Arguments” 1). The punishment should align with the crime so that both sides of the party feel satisfied. Furthermore, the criminal will not get an easy punishment for committing a horrendous crime because it is not fair to the victim if the criminals consequence is small …show more content…

According to Camille Phillips, death penalties aren’t given to regular cases. In one case, a 300 pound man who was around 6’6” killed his girlfriend and a two year old little girl and started to gut them. (Phillips 1). Not only did the man just murder two innocent people but in addition, he gutted them after he was done killing them. The death penalty was put in place for this case because the man did more than just murder someone. Capital punishment was fair in this event because a life sentence was not enough. The death penalty meets the requirements for the cases that need it, and it also lowers crime rate. In countries, such as the USA, China, and Iran, that maintain the death penalty as a form of punishment, crimes have declined throughout the years. Serial killers usually like to kill other people

Show More
Related
1318 Words | 6 Pages

Russ Shafer-Landau provides us with two separate arguments about the death penalty in his academic book The Ethical Life, fundamental readings in ethics and moral problems. In the first argument, Justifying Legal Punishment, Igor Primoratz gives us substantive reasoning that opts favorably toward the necessity of the death penalty. Contrasting Primoratz, Stephen Nathanson, through An Eye for an Eye, provides us with an argument that hopes to show us that capital punishment, like murder, is also immoral and therefore, unjust. By the end of this essay, I intend to show that while capital punishment may not be the easy choice for a consequence and punishment to murder, it is, however, the necessary one.

Read More
1646 Words | 7 Pages

The topic of capital punishment presents a test of values. The arguments in support of and opposition to the death penalty are complex. In the end, this is a question of an individual’s values and morals. The topic requires careful thought to reach a reasoned position. Both sides of the argument are defensible.

Read More
1044 Words | 5 Pages

For the victim's families, it may not feel good enough to just be living a life in prison or in some cases even being let back into society. And the death sentence

Read More
856 Words | 4 Pages

“An eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot” said the Bible about justice but it also says “You shall not murder,” so is morally accepted the murder to a murderer? The topic in discussion is whether should the death penalty be banned or allowed, if taking the life of a criminal is a necessary punishment. The article of The Editors "Ban the Death Penalty” is based on facts and analysis about how the death penalty is not proved to deter crimes. However, Adrianne Haslet-Davis’s article, "Why the Death Penalty Should Live" does not sustain her thoughts with information. Furthermore, The Editor advocated their article with information of the possible consequences of this punishment to show better their point when Haslet-Davis just shares her experience and beliefs missing to provide specific data.

Read More
1145 Words | 5 Pages

This article discusses individual cases and crimes and gives analysis of the arguments made against death penalty in real world. Firstly it discusses the deterrence argument while going through a number of cases. The conclusion is that it has no effect on reducing homicides but ironically it breeds violence as in some cases offenders committed a capital crime in a territory where execution still prevails while they could have easily avoided it. Second thing discussed is the cost, the research in article shows that it costs significantly more money to put a convict to death than to incarcerate him for life in a prison. Moreover it is shown that in many cases criminals are executed while there are reasonable doubts in their convictions and some have avoided execution by just a few hours before being exonerated.

Read More
1512 Words | 7 Pages

Around the world, when someone commits a crime of any sort, this person is been judged and placed in a prison. This method has been used for thousands of years. Although in the past, killing was also used as punishment against some crimes that were consider unforgivable. As people evolved, killing someone for a crime became and felt inhuman, so as result, death sentence has become less popular and some can say even rare. In exchange, more prisons were built and this became a norm.

Read More
1019 Words | 5 Pages

Introduction The film Carrie (Brian De Palma, 1976) follows the protagonist Carrie White, Sissy Spacek, who is a shy high school student residing in a small town. After receiving her first period, she acquires telekinetic powers, which turns her world around; especially since she did not understand what the change meant for her as a new woman. Although Carrie is a horror film, the underlying meaning points to feminism as it embarks on the discovery of power, and threatening the patriarchal order. Carrie is a feminist film where fear comes not in blood or telekinesis, but the fears of a strong woman.

Read More
1230 Words | 5 Pages

They don’t get to put the killer on trial and say what they believe is right. The victims families have to do everything that they believe the victim would want. Everyone in this world has someone. The effects of these murders are stuck with the families and friends. The death penalty can stop people from seeking revenge (“ the ultimate punishment letter”).

Read More
1636 Words | 7 Pages

Since ancient times the legal thought regarded the concept of death penalty as a measure necessary to protect fundamental values of the society. Along with the development of a state, state judicial system and regulations were developed as well, creating a two-fold purpose of the criminal law: punishment of a criminal and intimidation of population in order to prevent further possible crime commitment. These two initial positions are still present in the criminal law today and constitute the eternal debate around the topic of “for and against death penalty”. In this essay, I would like to briefly describe the two current positions along with the arguments and afterwards express my own opinion in that matter.

Read More
716 Words | 3 Pages

“The death penalty is not as effective as many people think.” The death penalty as a form of punishment for heavy crimes has been implemented worldwide for thousand years. Historically this punishment has always been associated with revenge and strength of power. Governments were using the death penalty to scare and suppress their enemies.

Read More
1834 Words | 8 Pages

People believe that if a definite punishment for criminal activity exists, people will be less likely to commit crimes against others (theft, assault, murder, etc.). Moreover, some Americans believe in capital punishment. Capital punishment implies that the government deliberately takes human life as a form of punishment for a crime, such as the death penalty. In an article by John R Vile, he states, “Advocates of capital punishment argue that it is a just penalty for those who have maliciously taken the lives of others and that the penalty properly vindicates the value of the lives of the victims. Proponents might also argue that the penalty is an effective deterrent to murder”.

Read More
597 Words | 3 Pages

Instead, they die, they're life is ended in an instant. They don’t pay for the acts they did. The criminals family's are stuck with the pain and sorrow. The family's are left paying for what they did, when it should be the other way

Read More
961 Words | 4 Pages

Each year in many countries around the world people are murdered in the name of “justice”. But can justice really include a sanitised form of revenge? Many people are for the death penalty regardless of what it actually is. A major way that the death penalty is flawed is shown in the amount of innocent people who are sentenced to death.

Read More
1383 Words | 6 Pages

Capital Punishment is the death penalty for those who commit murder. The thought behind this punishment is a life for a life. There has been debate on if the death penalty is right or wrong. Some poeple want the death penalty to be illegal while others argue it is needed to deter crime. There are many valid arguments regarding the death penalty.

Read More
861 Words | 4 Pages

When the final sentence is being decided, the system they use to determine, is very flawed. The sentence is determined not by the gravity of the crime, but depending heavily on the person’s lawyer. Another thing that is used against the defendant, is race. As sad as using race to determine when someone else’s life is going to end sounds, officials really do that. On top of the corrupted method officials use, the people being sent to death sentence have an extremely high risk of experiencing intense pain during the execution.

Read More

More about Analysis Of Arguments In Favour Of Capital Punishment

Related Topics

Open Document