La Relacion Argumentation Cabeza de Vaca always took what was best for his men into consideration before he made a decision. He always thought about his choices and he is a good leader for that reason. Although, he made some bad decisions like sending one of his men to scout out the island alone his intentions were good. In the end this decision led to the colonist meeting the Native Americans, who help the colonist survive. Cabeza de Vaca’s good choices often outweighed the bad ones.
Juan de Solorzano y Pereyra says that the Indians practiced savage customs or they attempted to commit treason against the Spanish people. Bartolome de Las Casas says that the Indians were gentle sheep and the Spaniards rushed in like a bunch of starving wolves, tigers and lions ready to devour. The Spaniards slew the Indians as if their lives did not matter what so ever. All of this happened throughout Cuba, Puerto Rico, Jamaica and Mexico (Hispaniola). Juan Gines de Sepulveda Sepulveda said that the Indians are a savage and cruel race and that the Spanish are a superior race that is why the Indians should be treated as if they are inferior.
Cabeza de vaca survived because of his respect for the native americans, his success as a healer, and his wilderness skills. The main idea was how did cabeza de vaca survive. I think this DBQ was helpful and informative and now i know what cabeza de vaca did to survive and how he did it. I felt like I was put into cabeza de vaca’s shoes for a long
How to go on a Successful Expedition Cabeza de Vaca, one of the world's greatest explorers. It's amazing how he was able to survive with little tools and help. Cabeza started his expedition in 1525 in seville, he later crashed in Galveston Island, Texas. He and 3 other people had to be able to survive in the new world, with nothing other than themselves and other little resources. Cabeza de Vaca was able to survive seeing that he knew a bit about the Indian tribes and how to speak their language(s), He also knew how to heal wounds and other such things, and most of all he knew how to survive in the wilderness.
Gerónimo de Aguilar claimed that he tried to convince Guerrero to leave with him, but failed. Guerrero was now already well-assimilated into the Maya culture and was looked upon as a figure of rank by the local Maya. Aguilar claimed that Guerrero had a Maya wife and three children at the Maya settlement of Chetumal where he was now living.[56] Aguilar would prove himself to be a valuable asset as a translator for Cortés expedition into the Yucatán. He had lived with the Maya for so long that he was now quite fluent in speaking “Yucatec Mayan,” along with a few other local indigenous languages.[57] Gonzalo Guerrero's fate was never known.
Discuss and analyze how and to what ends fantasy and reality are intertwined in stories you have studied. In this essay, we will discuss how magical realism uses elements of real and of magic to create the literary style. At first, we will try to give a background of what magic realism, where it comes from, and how a story can be labelled as such. Alejo Carpentier’s “Viaje a la semilla” and Julio Cortazar’s “La noche boca arriba” will be our focus.
Imagine a world where people come into your cities and take your jobs without you getting a choice. Out of nowhere your source of income is gone. The poem, “So Mexicans Are Taking Jobs from Americans” attacks that point of view of from a Mexican perspective. Jimmy Santiago Baca is the writer of the poem. He reflects on his Chicano and Apache heritage throughout the poem defending the Mexican people.
Written by Gloria Anzaldua, “How to Tame a Wild Tongue”, is an opinion easy , a retrospection of her past and a story about identity and recognition of a wild tongue. The following is a rhetorical analysis and personal response of this easy . My analysis will be divided into 4 separate parts including intended audience, main claim, purpose and situation. (a) Intended audience : The first thing that anyone who even skims through this easy would notice is Anzaldua’s multi-lingual language use.
Moreover, in 1537, another Spanish explorer known as Alvar Nunez Cabeza de Vaca, wrote a book titled La Relación, where he explained the obstacles him and his crew had to face during the Narvaez expedition in 1527 to the Spanish King, Charles I. In connection to all the men who sailed “from Cuba to Tampa Bay in present-day Florida” only “Alvar Nunez Cabeza de Vaca and three other men survived the expedition, but only after enduring a nine-year, six-hundred-mile trek across Texas and Mexico and enslavement by Indians…….” In my opinion, this letter gives the reader a much clearer understanding of the things that Cabeza de Vaca saw during his journey because he writes his letters using words like “my”, “I”, and “me” which makes it clear to us
The foundation and development of a human being stems from the individual’s position within his/her life (for instance, his/her opinion, stance, about oneself in regards to his/her own expectations) and within his/her communities as a member of a household, a race or even as a gender. The key factor of this notion, take in consideration the vast knowledge a person can evaluate against their own understanding. A person emerge into the world as a blank slate that unconsciously and continuously devouring and weaving in stories told in voices that evokes correlation identification with an image created by a mother, father, brothers, sister, aunt, uncle, cousins, grandma, grandpa, and even nicknamed strangers into their root and skin. An open-minded
The first piece of artwork I critiqued was the famous Virgin of Guadalupe. The Virgin of Guadalupe is currently exhibited in the Basilica of Guadalupe in Mexico City. The piece of art is not solely a painting, but an enconchado. It was made into wood, and it essentially creates a reflective surface that appears as moving. Also, I like how they explain their theory on the woman of the apocalypse and how it relates to this piece of art.
“The Spaniards made ready to attack us, and the war broke out again”, was written in a manuscript by an anonymous warriors of several surviving indigenous tribesmen. The manuscript describe the tribes suffering and slaughter of their tribe and other neighboring tribes. This narrative story was directed to the audience to hear the tale of the demise of the Tenochtitlan dynasty. The tribesmen wanted to let future generations hear how hard their men tried to defend their entire land for the invaders, the Spanish. The Spaniards conquistadors, Hernan “Captain” Cortez and Don Pedro “Sun” de Alvarado were traveling the land capturing the emperors of different tribe and killing them.
La voz a ti debida has received criticism from a number of academics for being a misogynistic work of poetry and is described as “androcentric” by Bermúdez. The theme of possession is widespread in the poem, along with the objectification of the amada, both anti-feminist elements of Salinas’s work. In addition to this, the beloved is portrayed as empty and lifeless, only acting as a hindrance to the happiness of the narrator, whether she loves him or does not. The amada’s power is only weakened by her lack of voice, taken from her by Salinas. The theme of possession is prevalent from the onset and throughout La Voz a ti Debida.
Vasco da Gama was a Portuguese explorer who was the first European to reach India by sea through one of the sea routes he discovered. He helped expand European trade and influenced many cultural discoveries in Europe. He also helped spread ideas throughout the known world. Vasco da Gama is still acknowledged today as a well-known explorer for discovering the sea route to India. This sea route helped benefit trade and commute, which is still used today for tourist purposes, because of Vasco da Gama’s first exploration discovery.
Fuente Ovejuna by Lope de Vega, is a play where the people of the town of Fuente Ovejuna rebel against their overlord, Fernán Gómez de Guzmán, who is a Commander of the Order of Calatrava, for cruel and brutal behavior towards them. They put an end to his tyranny by cutting his head off and reporting his deeds to King Fernando. The conclusion of the play with the people becoming subjects to the King makes the play reformist. Fernán Gómez horrifically abused the people of Fuente Ovejuna. For example, when he heard that Mengo defied orders, he stated, “He [Mengo] shall be flogged!”
