ipl-logo

Analysis Of Elie Wiesel's Perils Of Indifference

781 Words4 Pages

The speeches “Perils of Indifference” by Elie Wiesel and Barack Obama’s Presidential nomination speech both use rhetorical strategies. They use these to persuade the audience to agree with their opinions. ”Perils of indifference” by Elie Wiesel persuades the audience to stop being indifferent because it is dangerous. In Barack Obama’s Presidential nomination speech, he persuades the audience to make America a better place. While these speeches both use different rhetorical strategies Elie Wiesil has the stronger argument because of his use of rhetorical questions and pathos.
Elie Wiesel uses Rhetorical Questions to show the dangers of indifference. In “Perils of Indifference” lines 23-25 ,”What will the legacy of the vanishing century be? How …show more content…

An example of this is on lines 79-83 in “Perils of Indifference” it states, “The political prisoner in his cell, the hungry children, the homeless refuges - not to respond to their plight, not to relieve their solitude by offering them a spark of hope is to exile them from human memory. And in denying their humanity, we betray our own.” To summarize this quote, All of these people were suffering but were not helped. Humanity ignored them. They could have helped but didn’t ,therefore; humanity betrayed them. From this it could be inferred that Wiesel uses pathos because he wants to explain the pain the people in the holocaust felt. He wants to show how humanity caused that pain because of their indifference. Wiesel makes the audience feel guilty so they stop indifference. The author states in lines 172-75 ,”He has accompanied the old man I have become throughout these years of quest and struggle. And together we walk towards the new millennium, carried by profound fear and extraordinary hope.” Wiesel is basically saying how his younger self is still with him. Also how they both look towards a new beginning with fear people will continue to be indifferent, but also with hope that humanity will change. He uses pathos because it makes people feel sad for the indifference Wiesel was shown. But his words also give hope which makes the audience happy and trustful of

Show More
Related

Summary Of Wiesel's View Of Indifference

242 Words | 1 Pages

Wiesel introduces his first claim by asking the audience about their perspective of the word Indifference and gives it definition and his own to then again question his audience about its effects. The reason for this structure was to get to audience to really think about what he is asking to provide their own perspective of Indifference and to see if their answer is like his own. He repeats the first letter of every word to emphasize the contrast between those who are indifferent and those who are not (which is his answer). He therefore backs up his answer by providing another one of his personal experience about what happened behind the gates of Auschwitz and the people. As he grows more towards the topic of indifference, he takes the time

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of Night By Elie Wiesel

324 Words | 2 Pages

He uses rhetorical appeals, the one he uses the best is pathos. The meaning of pathos is to appeal to the readers emotions. The author is trying to use the reader's heart instead of their brain to bend their opinion. Wiesel starts off by using pathos to make the reader feel emotional.

Read More

How Does Elie Wiesel Use Ethos In The Perils Of Indifference

548 Words | 3 Pages

One significant strategy used in Wiesel’s speech is pathos. Wiesel uses pathos liberally throughout his speech

Read More

Pathos In Night By Elie Wiesel

269 Words | 2 Pages

Wiesel wanted to make us feel sad and trust him by using pathos in the speech. At the beginning of the speech, he states, “Do I have the right to accept this great honor on their behalf? I do not. No one may speak for the dead, no one may interpret their mutilated dreams and visions.” In this part of his talk, he tells the people that no one can ever make up for the loss of so many people in the concentration camps.

Read More

Literary Techniques Used In Night By Elie Wiesel

1364 Words | 6 Pages

These withered bodies had long forgotten the bitter taste of tears” (Wiesel, 63). Elie Wiesel uses this quote to appeal to the reader’s sympathy by communicating the inhumane life inside a concentration camp and the hopeless state of the prisoners. This quote also communicates Elie Wiesel’s reliability as someone who witnessed and experienced the horrific topics discussed in the memoir. Both appeals relate to the main purpose in how horrific events that result in horrors just as Elie Wiesel describes should never happen again, and therefore need to be fought against and addressed. Another usage of pathos Elie Wiesel utilizes is when describing the prisoners’ reaction to witnessing the hangings of the 2 men and the child, where states, “‘For God’s sake, where is God?’

Read More

How Does Elie Wiesel Use Ethos In The Perils Of Indifference

686 Words | 3 Pages

Elie Wiesel’s “The Perils of Indifference” uses pathos, loaded words, and rhetorical questions to persuade his audience that one must act when they see injustice, suffering, or unfair treatment. The use of pathos in “The Perils of Indifference” persuades the audience that one must act when they see injustice. “He was finally free, but there

Read More

Examples Of What Will The Legacy Of This Vanishing Century By Elie Wiesel

140 Words | 1 Pages

Utilization of the repetition of questions allows Wiesel to make the audience ultimately feel as if they are in control of deciding what they think is morally correct. Within almost every paragraph, Wiesel asks his listeners rhetorical questions which truly have one compassionate answer. By using the questions, Wiesel manages to assist the listener in choosing his side without simply telling them what the right answer is. For example, when Wiesel asks if “the human being [has] become less indifferent and more human,” he implies that indifference in unconditionally inhumane. The question of “what will the legacy of this vanishing century be?” fills the audience with the duty of making the end of the century and the upcoming century the most

Read More

Analysis Of Elie Wiesel's And The World Remained Silent

391 Words | 2 Pages

To most the book sounds angry or vengeful, but not to me. The tone I felt from this book was hurt, pain, and mostly betrayal. Wiesel was betrayed by the people he was once apart of, by the country he once loved. The true horror behind any tragedy isn’t the twisted person who caused it, it is easy to

Read More

The Perils Of Indifference Rhetorical Devices

846 Words | 4 Pages

According to Elie Wiesel, our sorrow and suffering are little in compared to the apathy with which we have not responded. The fact that we choose to ignore other people's pain shows that the problem of indifference will never be overcome. As a child, Wiesel observed horrific injustices that inspired him to not only teach people about indifference, but also to show them the risks of indifference's anguish and despair. “Indifference, after all, is more dangerous than anger or hatred.(Wiesel)”This comment also helps him comprehend apathy since he utilizes words like "hate" to make his audience feel wounded in some way because no one appreciates being a target. Wiesel used rhetorical questions and references to make his point relatable to every individual in his audience, making his address clear, dependable, and, most importantly, pleasant by putting the audience in his shoes and the shoes of those who have suffered as a result of apathy.

Read More

Elie Wiesel Nobel Prize Acceptance Speech Analysis

609 Words | 3 Pages

When Wiesel makes it clear that he has suffered personal loss, he is evoking an emotional response from his audience. By stating that he senses their presence “The presence of my parents, that of my little sister.” the audience empathizes with him and the horror of the Holocaust is made more clear for them. They cannot only understand his feelings; they can connect to them which strengthens their understanding of the need to act whenever they witness inhumanity.

Read More

Elie Wiesel's The Perils Of Indifference

954 Words | 4 Pages

In this speech, Elie Wiesel’s intent was to inform people on the devastating effects of indifference in society. “Indifference, after all, is more dangerous than anger and hatred.” Just goes to show how detrimental indifference can be. Indifference is genuinely a blinding feeling. By being indifferent, you choose to look the other way, you choose to stay silent, rather than fighting to make a change.

Read More

Elie Wiesel's The Perils Of Indifference

728 Words | 3 Pages

The general statement made by Elie Wiesel in his speech, The Perils of Indifference, is that indifference is sinful. More specifically, Wiesel argues that awareness needs to be brought that indifference is dangerous. He writes “Indifference is not a beginning, it is an end”. In this speech, Wiesel is suggesting that indifference is dangerous it can bring the end to many lives. In conclusion Wiesel's belief is suggesting that indifference is an end, it needs to be noticed and taken care of.

Read More

Perils Of Indifference By Elie Wiesel And Catherine A. Sanderson

925 Words | 4 Pages

In source 1 Wiesel uses pathos by adding emotions known as loaded language. A term coined to mean the usage of heavy emotional language to impact the reader on a more personal level. An example the reader can see in the passage is in the following quote; "In a way, to be indifferent to that suffering is what makes the human being inhuman. Indifference, after all, is more dangerous than anger and hatred." -Elie Wiesel (source 1).

Read More

Critical Evaluation Essay: The Perils Of Indifference

855 Words | 4 Pages

In the speech, titled “The Perils of Indifference,” Elie Wiesel showed gratitude to the American people, President Clinton, and Mrs. Hillary Clinton for the help they brought and apprised the audience about the violent consequences and human suffering due to indifference against humanity (Wiesel). This speech was persuasive. It was also effective because it conveyed to the audience the understanding of

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of Elie Wiesel's Speech

552 Words | 3 Pages

Wiesel brings out syntax for the ending of his speech but also incorporates pathos wrapping it all back together with the sadness and pity on all of us for the harmful silence done to the jews in the holocaust. Syntax was the most obvious rhetorical device used because you can physically see how it is being presented differently than the rest but also sending a message and not being so formal about it. Pathos was a very huge part to Wiesel’s whole entire speech as he was constantly trying to turn everyones thoughts and perspectives to what he was exactly seeing in his own eyes. Elie Wiesel wanted to show the world the horrible act of indifference and how it has personally affected him as a child and for his whole life growing up. Wiesel manages to create many viewpoints and to throw us in his shoes for us to understand the inhumanity of the ones had no sympathy towards the jews during the holocaust.

Read More

More about Analysis Of Elie Wiesel's Perils Of Indifference

Related Topics

Open Document