Emily Keyes is the author of the article "Arctic Policy: Assets and Opportunities".
Unfortunately, I was unable to obtain the author's full background and credentials other than what is mentioned in the article. Based on the article, Keyes appears to understand Arctic policy and the economic potential of the region. However, without more information, it is difficult to determine if she is an expert in the field or has other relevant expertise. It is also unclear what she has written beyond this article.
Emily Keyes' article "Arctic Policy: Assets and Opportunities" utilizes several rhetorical choices and considers context to effectively communicate information on Arctic policy. One rhetorical choice is the use of persuasive language,
…show more content…
The author presents arguments in a clear and logical manner, using evidence and examples to support their claims. However, the article is also written in a way that is engaging and accessible to a broad audience.There is little use of figurative language in the article, with the author generally sticking to straightforward language and avoiding overly flowery prose. When metaphors or analogies are used, they are usually relatively simple and designed to make complex ideas more accessible to readers.
Overall, the diction in "Arctic Policy: Assets and Opportunities" strikes a balance between technical and accessible language, presenting complex ideas in a clear and engaging manner that is appropriate for a broad audience.
Emily Keyes' article "Arctic Policy: Assets and Opportunities" uses several rhetorical strategies to argue that the United States should prioritize the Arctic region. One strategy she employs is the use of statistics and data to support her arguments. For example, she cites the US
Geological Survey's estimate that the Arctic contains 13% of the world's undiscovered oil and
30% of its undiscovered natural gas. She also cites the Arctic Economic Council's report on
…show more content…
By doing so, Keyes can establish credibility and authority for her arguments. Finally, Keyes employs an optimistic tone throughout the article. She describes the Arctic as a place of "limitless possibilities" and emphasizes the economic potential of the region. By presenting the Arctic in this way, Keyes can tap into her readers' sense of optimism and possibility, making her argument more persuasive.
It is difficult to determine whether Emily Case is entirely objective in her article "Arctic
Policy: Assets and Opportunities. The purpose of the article is to argue the importance of the
Arctic region, and Case uses rhetorical strategies to persuade readers to accept her point of view.
This suggests that the author has a bias toward the topic and that her goal is to influence the reader's opinion. However, it is important to note that it is not necessarily a negative thing for the author to own the point or argument they are trying to make. It is up to the reader to evaluate the arguments presented and decide if they are convincing. The fact that Keith may not be completely objective does not necessarily affect the reader's ability to understand the text. Rather, it is important that readers understand the