By using strong supporting arguments In the essay entitled, Everyone is Watching You, by Nadine Strossen. Strossen’s goal in the essay is to influence her readers that surveillance cameras do more damage than good, and that something needs to be done to eliminate them. Her controversy on this matter was very vigorous, Strossen convincingly argues that surveillance cameras are an atrocious idea and needs to be stopped. She does a satisfying job of catering to her viewers in her essay. With a topic that pertains to everybody, she takes the opportunity to use this to her convenience. She references this to a book, called 1984, and goes on to relate the topic to everyone who will see the essay. From the beginning she tells the viewers that they will encounter cameras almost everywhere they go and the only place that might be safe is their home. …show more content…
She states “ Consider the chilling story of Barbara Katenda, who recently told the New York Times that she had spotted a camera on a rooftop about 200 yards away from her apartment. A rooftop she had seen, but not thought about every time she stood before her sixth floor window with the blinds open, lounging around in her underwear or in nothing at all. The camera monitors traffic, but has a powerful zoom and can turn in any direction.” Knowing that people enjoy their privacy, Strossen mentions to she can hit a nerve. She claims in her essay that these surveillance cameras destroy what tiny privacy is left. Just in case this does not persuade, she also uses a few statistics to confirm her