ipl-logo

Analysis Of Gabriel's Rebellion By Douglas R. Egerton

1812 Words8 Pages

In Gabriel’s Rebellion: The Virginia Conspiracies of 1800 & 1802, Douglas R. Egerton examines the events that led Gabriel to form his emancipation plan, and the subsequent aftermath that resulted. Through the use of a variety of primary sources—most notably trial records—Egerton paints an extensive and well written narrative. His account stretches from the American Revolution and the promise of freedom, to the end of the 1802 conspiracy and the Virginia Assembly’s bitter intentions to curtail the possibility of future rebellions. Yet, Egerton includes a wide assortment of asides, different characters, background information, and quotes that blend together to form a cohesive story. Through this book, Egerton argues that Gabriel, and consequently …show more content…

Egerton provides an incredibly detailed and persuasive depiction of the controversies and revolutionary thought, including a variety of stories that supplement the overall narrative—such as the perspectives of rebel recruiters, the actions of elite planters, or the account of one female rebel. Interestingly though, as Egerton interprets the two conspiracies with regard to overall racial equality, he continually insists that Gabriel only disliked merchants, as seen in the preface. When discussing the formation of Gabriel’s mindset, as well, Egerton states that he “came to see the “merchants” who dominated the city, and not whites in general, as his chief antagonists.” I would argue that although labor and economic equality was Gabriel’s personal goal, he recognized the importance and necessity of overall equality. His status as a bondman, as well as his lack of certain freedoms, was a result of a larger issue—a society dominated by white elites that benefited from a cheap and profitable labor force of their own creation. In order for Gabriel to truly gain the benefits from his craft that he deserved, he would need all whites to recognize him and other blacks as the equals they truly were. Thus, although Gabriel saw merchants as his enemies, it is evident that his hate went …show more content…

The first, and most personal, aspect of his plan involved the murder of his master Thomas Prosser, and Absalom Johnson. Whatever his reasoning was, Gabriel’s plan depicted these two as clear enemies to his goals, forcing them to pay for their crimes. Later, after Governor James Monroe had been captured, the plan called for the death of the Richmond townspeople—not including groups such as the poor whites—until they gave into his demands. Gabriel, by this point in time, called for political, social, and economic equality with white elites, a vision now far beyond just labor rights. Gabriel’s plan was more than an attack on merchants, it was at least an attack on white elites, and possibly those who could at least afford to live somewhat comfortably in the city. He was looking to rise up against those that were oppressing him—an issue that involved merchants but certainly was not limited to

Show More
Related
506 Words | 3 Pages

He challenged this assumption by arguing that historians and South Carolina officials had written the result of the Stono Rebellion in reverse. Many of the historians and officials had assumed that there was a competent conspiracy theory to rebel before the violence even erupted. Hoffer again disagreed with this assumption. After analyzing the many causes that could’ve started the rebellion, the author came across many shortcomings and deficiencies of the traditional conspiracy theories that many individuals believe caused the rebellion.

Read More
1051 Words | 5 Pages

Holton divides his book into four chronological sections. The first segment of book is entitled “Grievances, 1763-1774”. This is where Holton expands on the history between Land Speculators, Indians, and Privy Council. Holton highlights how natives resisting colonial expansion combined with British officials tactically avoiding another expensive Indian war frustrated Virginia 's many land speculators. Those same Virginians, as tobacco planters and slave-owners, were also deeply upset by imperial trade policy The governments response’s to the burgesses petitions would affect the allegiance to Britain by men like Jefferson and Washington.

Read More
400 Words | 2 Pages

After the declaration of independence in 1776, different groups of people raised particular issues concerning their status in the society through petitions. This paper will consist in presenting three petitions written in the late eighteenth century. The first document is addressed to the authorities of the state of Pennsylvania in 1784 by the leaders of Philadelphia Jewish community concerning the religious aspect of the constitution. The second petition is addressed by enslaves African-Americans to the Massachusetts Legislature in 1777 about the status of slaves.

Read More
362 Words | 2 Pages

In the book The Birth of the Republic, 1763-89, Edmund S. Morgan uses narrative analysis to describe an account of the beginnings of the American government. He explains in depth how the problems of British taxation made the Americans want to search for alternative, established standards to secure their own freedom, and how it led to Revolution. It is obvious, as it is shown in the bibliography, that Morgan used much research to secure his claims. He enjoys saying, “When you construct a building, you put up scaffolding. But when the building is finished, you take the scaffolding down.”

Read More
882 Words | 4 Pages

Allen Guelzo and Vincent Harding approached Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation and the eventual abolition of slavery from two very different viewpoints. The major disagreement between them is whether the slaves freed themselves, or Abraham Lincoln and his Emancipation Proclamation freed them. Harding argued the former view, Guelzo took the later. When these essays are compared side by side Guelzo’s is stronger because, unlike Harding, he was able to keep his own views of American race relations out of the essay and presented an argument that was based on more than emotion. Allen Guelzo

Read More
947 Words | 4 Pages

The Radical and the Republican by James Oakes Book Review James Oakes’ The Radical and the Republican is a thorough and captivating account of two of America’s most distinguished figures, Abraham Lincoln and Frederick Douglas. In his intriguing and polished work, Oakes examines the issues of slavery, race, politics, and war in America during the mid-1800’s. Though both Abraham Lincoln and Frederick Douglas engendered immense social and political change throughout the Civil War era, the relationship between the two men is often neglected.

Read More
854 Words | 4 Pages

Edward Mitchell 10/22/2016 English 10 Essay Unit 1 Patrick Henry and Thomas Jefferson played a large role in motivating the fight toward freedom in the weeks leading up to the Revolutionary War and immediately following it. Each believed in the fundamental right to be free from rule. Patrick Henry appealed to the people’s fear of war. Thomas Jefferson was able to convince people that together, they could form a new nation. The writings of each man reveals a very chaotic time in America’s history and the leadership, determination, and boldness of Patrick Henry and Thomas Jefferson ensured that when change came, the people were ready for it.

Read More
1212 Words | 5 Pages

In contrast to the literature of the Colonial Period, much of the writing of the eighteenth century was devoted to a single overwhelming subject—the American Revolution. During that time, as words became weapons, Patrick Henry’s “Speech in the Virginia Convention,” Thomas Jefferson’s document, The Declaration of Independence, and Thomas Paine’s “Crisis I” pamphlet stand as three influential documents that called for armed defense of the basic rights that the previous generation had sought to define and establish. Patrick Henry’s “Speech in the Virginia Convention” strongly advocates for the assumption of a defensive position against the British in Virginia through significant use of emotion and appeals to logic, thereby endorsing the defense

Read More
1537 Words | 7 Pages

The Conspiracy Trial of 1741 never existed; it was all nothing but fiction made up by a guilty conscience. The whites realized how badly they were treating others, and the fact that these “slaves” didn’t do anything

Read More
1222 Words | 5 Pages

“The Collaborators” describes how former collaborators, Thomas Jefferson and John Adams, formed new collaborations as they found themselves on opposite sides of the political division that emerged at the end of the Washington presidency. The fact that Jefferson and Adams both died on July 4, 1826, the fiftieth anniversary of the of the Declaration of Independence makes their relationship so much more intriguing and it is hard to think of one without thinking of the other. Ellis writes of them, “They were the odd couple of the American Revolution”… “who lived together through some of the most formative events of the revolutionary era”(163). They were different in ideology, appearance and manner.

Read More
495 Words | 2 Pages

When he arrives in Mecca he is astounded to find that there are people of all races and colors here that are not being discriminatory towards each other and throughout the rest of his journey he begins to see the true face of Islam and sees the error in Elijah Muhammad’s teachings. This affects the central idea of integration vs separation since he saw that it is completely possible for white people and black people to coincide, they just need to actually respect each other and not judge based on the other one’s

Read More
1552 Words | 7 Pages

When Coalhouse and his fellow supporters took over J.P. Morgan’s library, his sole demand was not “greater freedoms for blacks” or “an end to systemic racism” but simply “[his] car returned in just the condition it was when my way was blocked,” (232) . His sole demand was not one relating to a higher cause, but one relating a personal cause of his own. Once Coalhouse received what he wanted, he ended the “ransom” situation—much to the chagrin of his supporters. Coalhouse’s supporters believed in a higher cause, and when he abandoned it in favor of receiving his “god damn car,” his followers made “appeals to change his mind… They said they were a nation,” (249).

Read More
1745 Words | 7 Pages

Washington and W.E.B. Du Bois. Prior to the riot, African Americans had listened to Washington’s advice. Washington believed that African Americans should be sublevel to whites and focus all their time working diligently and progressing in blue-collar society. This would allow whites to feel supreme, but also allow African Americans to make something of themselves and provide for their families. Washington wanted blacks to be educationally ready for the argument of equality.

Read More
1787 Words | 8 Pages

John Adams tells the story of the Revolution accurately in most cases, but can be found at fault of misrepresentation in many instances. These inaccuracies, no matter how small or large they may seem, change the way John Adams tells the tale of John

Read More
1096 Words | 5 Pages

The War for Independence, which lasted from 1776 to 1783, was a defining moment in American history. It was a period marked by intense revolutionary rhetoric, which aimed to break free from the British monarchy and establish a new democratic republic in America. The question of whether the young American Republic upheld this revolutionary rhetoric is a complex one, with no easy answer. To begin to answer this question, it is important to examine the nature of the rhetoric that emerged during the War for Independence and to understand the ways in which it was translated into policy and practice in the years that followed.

Read More

More about Analysis Of Gabriel's Rebellion By Douglas R. Egerton

Related Topics

Open Document