In Glenn Reynolds’ article “A War on College Men” he is responding to Jared Polis’ idea of expelling all men who are accused of sexual assault on college campuses, believing it is better to get rid of all, even if two out of ten are actually guilty. It would flip one of the “longstanding traditions of American law,” which is the idea that letting ten guilty men free is better than imprisoning one innocent. According to Reynolds, this policy would be going against due process rights. Expulsion for sexual assault on a man’s record would create extreme difficulty with entering a new college or finding a job. Reynolds quotes Eugene Volokh’s ideas that Polis “doesn’t think the rights of the accused are very important at all” and that this …show more content…
However, according to Reynolds, Polis’ idea would go directly against this law. He then presents the idea that men are a minority, saying that if any other minority group was treated in such a way, it would be called discrimination. Reynolds made several key mistakes in his article. By clearly ignoring the opposing argument, he came across as incredibly biased and ignorant- only choosing sources that supported his own ideas, as well as being completely misunderstanding to what Polis was trying to do. When convincing someone that one idea is better than another, it is best to show the pros and cons of both sides. Reynolds’ way of wording his opinions also made his article difficult