Analysis Of Howard Zinn's The Myth Of A Good War

321 Words2 Pages
In Howard Zinn’s speech, “The Myth of a Good War” (or “Three Holy Wars”), he talks about the misleading air surround three very brutal and devastating wars that shaped our country. As his title implies, he talks about the mythical concept of a “good” war – as designed by our government. Peter Stearns’ article, “Why Study History?”, describes the value placed in the study of history. Stearns points out the relevance of history in relation to our identity, both individually and as a whole nation. Stearns states that history helps us establish our identity, and briefly articulates that countries use this method of identity history, as well is misuse it to sway their manipulation the self-identity of its people. As Zinn explains in his speech,