Analysis Of John Steinbeck's Of Mice And Men

858 Words4 Pages

Funny-Heart Wrenching-Engaging are the few words of many that describe the amazing literature work known as “Of Mice and Men” by John Steinbeck. John Steinbeck is renowned for his many fascinating works and adept usage of descriptive details in his writing. He continues this trend in his award-winning book “Of Mice and Men.” From unhappy marriages, to mental disability, to overall displeasure in life, John Steinbeck goes in this book where many other author’s never choose to tread in the world of literature.
Steinbeck bases this work off of a time in which migrant workers seek out a true purpose and work to achieve their dreams in life as a whole. George is one of the workers, and is affiliated with Lennie, who just so happens to have a mental …show more content…

However he still rode along with Lennie and thoroughly supported him without falter. In this sense, Steinbeck invests a sense of compassion in his character of George. Tolerance is a theme that shines through in this sense, and readers could learn that there’s no reason to simply shut out or give up on anyone due to their mental state. Growing up I’ve always pondered upon the saying “Promoting tolerance and human dignity is one of mankind's unfinished challenges.” In having this underlying theme Steinbeck provides first hand examples of tolerance and never abandoning one in …show more content…

Now let me spare the intricate details, and scamper my way directly to what I feel makes this book truly stand out and a great read. The true scene in this book, making this a tragedy as a whole is the scene where George puts Lennie out of his misery. In this act, George saved Lennie from a life of mistakes and suffering from his mental incapacitation and finally allowed him to attain eternal peace. Steinbeck didn’t go with the generic “and they lived happily ever after” with this work of literature. He went straight for the unexpected-- something untouched upon in literature and that was the unhappy ending. This one scene earned Steinbeck prominence in the lack of ubiquity of this