Beatrice said the Great Depression taught the family how to get by with what they
This photograph is tied to the Great Depression which hit Canada from 1929 – 1939. It shows a group of men lined up for a soup kitchen. Around 1933 a year before the photo was taken, around 30 percent of employable Torontonians were jobless. By 1934, when this photograph was taken, 120,000 unemployed Torontonians were on relief. The photographer might have been hired by the Canadian government to take this photo to promote soup kitchens for the people who couldn’t afford a meal on the table.
Providing this information in the text adds to the overall pathos of the text and emotional response of the audience, both towards the family
Urbanization made many families move to cities and start entirely new lifestyles that hadn’t been as prominent in the past. Before industrialization, the cottage industry, small home businesses, and farming were common forms of income. But, as they moved to cities, that had to change. Familial life weakened as mothers began working in factories, children occupying their time either working or playing in the dirty streets. People lived in overcrowded tenants or apartments.
This statement further connects the intertwinement of the family, their tradition, and their house. It’s also a symbolic element that further eludes to the fall of the family and
Facing this severe amount of loss is not an easy task for the public to face, and many could not bear it all together. Going from having a very decent life to basically fighting tooth and nail to keep your home is a tough concept to fathom for most of America today, but it was the reality. An essay by Robert J. Hastings, “Digging In”, perfectly paints the mindset of his family and most of public in regards to what they had to give up. In this dissertation, Hastings writes about how the state of the economy was and that they gave up whatever possible: “With no dependable income, we cut back on everything possible… turned off city water… sold our Model T Ford…”. Perhaps his feelings toward cutting back are a little softer in retrospect, but picturing what was then lacking in homes completes the perspective on the Great Depression itself.
The letter provides a personal account of the bad circumstances and desperation experienced by individuals and families during that time. The most effective point in the letter that explains this is the author's statement, "I have no money at all to buy the baby clothes. " This simple sentence shows the severe poverty and lack of resources that families were dealing with, and it highlights the urgent need for assistance. People can use this letter as a primary source to show the real-life struggles and challenges faced by ordinary people during the Great Depression, adding deep and personal descriptions to their historical
The Great Depression was an unexpected event that happened suddenly and lasted for a decade. During this time, Americans had felt as if there was no hope, since money was a struggle to both keep and earn. In text 2, the author expresses how her mother would hope for events that would help their family during this time, such as raining, since her father was a farmer. Raining would help their family produce food for themselves and not have to worry about spending money on food. Another example is in text 1, where the author explains how “we weren’t hungry, but we were penniless.”
Your family is homeless,penniless and hungry. For many people during the 1930’s, this was common. The Great Depression has an adverse effect
The family in “Father Knows Best” is also portrayed as a very
Imagine this: A family is living their normal lives in the 1930s. All of a sudden, banks go under and jobs start to disappear. The same family that was living in comfort, now has to stretch every dollar. Common items have become scarce. Diapers are being used as dish towels and things are becoming dire.
Meanwhile, for The Hungry Years discussed extremely wide range of aspects support by vast amount sources, which made this book is inspiring to readers who wanted to understand more about Great Depression because a lot of the issues were described by Watkins. Watkins collected ideas from different other publications to come up with this book, so that life of Americans from various industries could be revealed by the readers. The whole book is enriched by real stories of people's hard life, wandering at night to find shelter, losing their home and belongs, the response of the labors, how general public response to Roosevelt's New Deal programs. Yet, this could also the weakness of this book, because Watkins did not include oral histories that
The great depression made a major impact on the lives of the people that lived through it. One group of people that is often overlooked are children that lived during that time period. When the parents lost their jobs the responsibility the parent once held was put on the children of the families to contribute to the income of the home. Because of this in the great depression “two-fifths of children were employed in part time jobs” (Elder 65). In Glen Elder’s book Children of the Great Depression: Social Change in Life Experience he discusses how the depression affected those children in their later lives.
With this understanding, families often need help to resolve their predicaments, to be able to function together as a unit to different entities (Murdock, 2013). Scholars
“The Changing American Family” by Natalie Angier states, “Fictive families are springing up among young people, old people, disabled people, homeless people, and may well define one of the ultimate evolutions of the family concept, maximizing, as they do, the opportunities for fulfillment of specific social and economic needs outside the constraints of biological relatedness.” The ever changing social dynamics and circumstances of this life have opened the definition of family to encompass individuals who can fill those deep-seated needs
