Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Adolescent brain
Thesis on teenage brain
The teenage brain summary
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Paul Thompson in the article “Startling Finds on Teenage Brains” , claims that 14 year old Brazil, charged in last May’s shooting of middle school teacher Gunrow, was found guilty of second degree murder. Paul Thompson supports his by first explaining that Brazil was only 12 when the incident happen. He then says since he was only 12 , his brain was and still is not fully developed. Lastly the author says ,” teenagers are not yet adults , and the legal system shouldn’t treat them as such. Thompson’s purpose is to get the world to know , if children are not yet adults, why are they being treated like one in the legal system in order to stop it.
In “Startling Finds on Teenage Brains,” Paul Thompson--a neuroscientist at UCLA--argues that minors should not be sentenced as adults because their brains are not the same as adults’ brains. Even though Thompson believes that minors should be held accountable for their crimes, he presents evidence from recent studies to explain the differences between the brains of minors and adults. It is not surprising that Thompson uses logical evidence to defend his position, given that he is a scientist. However, Thompson frequently uses emotional persuasion--or pathos--to convince his readers that sentencing minors as adults is both unjust and uninformed. Through his use of structure and emotionally charged language, Thompson attempts to convince readers
Thompsons purpose is to point out that teenagers who commit crimes can and will be charged as adults in order for kids to think about what they are doing and not make stupid mistakes.
Paul Thompson in the article "Startling Finds on Teenage Brains" suggest that teenagers have something in their brains. Thompson supports his/her suggestion by first explaining how a 14 year old killed a teacher and outside people are say a “A child is not a man.” He/she then tells how school shootings have gotten more frequent over the years and also how teenagers lose a lot of brain tissue during their teenage years.
According to the eighth amendment it's been band to sentence a juvenile life in prison for commiting murder because it's cruel and unusual punishment. The reason for it is because teens aren't as mature as an adult and should not be treated as one. Teens should be tried as juveniles and have less harsh of a penalty then an adult. The supreme court ruled that juveniles who committed murder could not be sentenced to life in prison for a reason and that reason is teen brains aren't fully developed and mature.
In the article, “Kids are not Adults” by Sarah Alice Brown are exploring the brain development in adolescents when committing a crime. As the article stated, a “teens brain do not fully develop until about the age 25”. When an adolescent is presenting with situations that deal with right and wrong, they would make a rash decision which can have serious consequences. I love that multiple states are working on creating programs that are geared to decreasing the juvenile justice system. Putting in the work to start reshaping our teen’s mindset.
Paul Thompson in the article “Startling Finds on Teenage Brains” explains that any young teen is dar from adulthood. Thompson supports his statement by first giving examples on the different studies being held on the brains of teens. He then gives us some of the own research that his group at University of California, Los Angeles and says that there is a massive loss of brain tissue that occurs in teenage years also that they’re mainly being lost in the areas controlling impulses, risk taking, and self control. Lastly, the author says does “planning” mean the same thing for a thirteen year old as it means for an adult he says this to try and make us wonder does a kid think the same as an adult when it come to certain situation. Thompson’s
At just 14, Young’s brain was certainly not fully developed. Teen brains lack proper decision making skills. The brain is far more irrational, reckless, emotional, and easily influenced than the adult brain. The article “Beautiful Brains”, further expands on this topic, going into depth about what it is exactly that causes juveniles to act this way. The article explains, “The brain undergoes extensive remodeling, resembling a network and a wiring upgrade.”
In the article “Adolescent Angst: 5 Facts About the Teenage Brain” (2012), Robin Nixon states that during a person’s adolescent years they experience many different emotions and experiences that cause them to do certain actions. Nixon also states that brain research could also give reason as to why teens make may make certain bad or impulsive decisions. For example Nixon explains that teens face intense emotions because “the amygdala is thought to connect sensory information to emotional responses. Its development, along with hormonal changes, may give rise to newly intense experiences of rage, fear, aggression (including toward oneself), excitement and sexual attraction.” The actions of Romeo and Juliet correlate with modern brain research
Thompson, in the article “Startling Finds on Teenage Brains” (2001) claims that teenagers should not be tried as adults after committing a crime because their brains are not fully developed. In this article Thompson supports all of his ethos claims by using logos and real facts that have been cited, this gives him the title to an author who uses the strongest ethos. In Thompson’s article he talks about a child named Nathaniel Brazil, who was only fourteen when he shot his own teacher at a middle-school because the teacher wouldn’t allow him to get out of class early to say goodbye to a girl. Brazil was later tried in court and found guilty of second degree murder. When Thompson writes about Brazil and his charges he claims that, “in recent
The Juveniles are kids not adults and that they don’t have the same brain development as adults do. In the article, “Starting finds on Teenage Brains” by Paul Thompson saying that during this time of period in teenagers be having massive loss of brain tissue. It is believed that the massive brain loss tissue supports all teens thinking and emotions. It also says, “Brain cells and connections are only being lost in areas controlling impulses, risk taking and self control.”
Tommy G Thompson in his article "Law of minors must come to 90," argues; "Children who steal and murder must be punished according to the gravity of their offences, not to the" sensitivity "of his age. Young people running with gangs, terrorizing neighborhoods, are as frightening as adults; more than that, in fact, because are damaged so early ". " He also claims; "Gangs are able to use these young people to commit crimes, knowing that the punishment will not be so serious." According to Thompson, the majority of juvenile offenders are "in charge of" gang members and criminal master mind but instead of punishing these youths with the prosecution of adults and sentencing why not capture the real culprits behind it all and clean our streets of drug dealers and gang
Some people believe that juveniles shouldn’t get sentenced to life in prison because of brain studies, age, and the way of living. Recent brain studies have suggested that teenagers suffer from brain-tissue loss, this might be the reason why they commit idiotic decisions. In Gail Garingers article “Juveniles Don’t Deserve Life Sentences” she states “Young people are biologically different from adults.” Then she talks about the young adolescents being sentenced to die in prison. Also how there is a myth about the superpredator and how children are hopelessly
But this actually disproves juvenile advocates reliance on the “underdeveloped brain” argument. If brain development were the reason, then teens would kill at roughly the same rates all over the world(Jenkins 91). This is something that doesn’t happens, you won’t be seeing teens around the world murdering people. Brain development is just something people don’t understand how it really works and use this argument to try to lower criminals culpability.
Teenagers are not perfect, and their irrational behavior can lead to poor decisions that could potentially be dangerous and unlawful. A debate has now occurred for many years that deals with the issue of sentencing teens that have committed serious crimes such as murder and robbery. Many people argue that if juveniles commit these crimes that their punishment should be equal to an adults punishment for serious crimes, but juveniles shouldn’t have to worry about their lives getting ruined. Most juveniles and teenagers do not have enough maturity to survive in the adult prison system, and recent brain development research shows us that teenagers brains are not even close to being finished developing. Therefore, teenagers and youth under the age of eighteen should