All the tools we have are awful’” (147). That is the problem with digital security. The average stereotypical lazy American does not want to be inconvenienced, which is why the government can access almost anything we put online. Our online lives are like an elementary school girl’s diary that doesn’t have a key and is hidden under her pillow, which is not secretive at all.
Technology is advancing very rapidly, but that does not necessarily mean it is benefiting society. In the article, “ Is Google Making Us Stupid”, Nicholas Carr explores how the internet alters people’s mental abilities. Malcolm Gladwell writes an article titled, “ Small Change”, in which he draws attention to how the internet has changed the engagement of social activism. Carr’s argument that the internet alters mental abilities, changes thought processes, and destroys concentration, complicates Gladwell’s thesis that the internet loses the meaning of social activism, changes how activist are defined, and takes over activism on a social level. The arguments presented are similar but the outcomes of the internet vary between the two writers.
As the phenomenon of the Internet becomes more accessible to most groups of people, it has been seen as both appreciation and criticism. In "Is Google Making Us Stupid?" by Nicholas Carr argues that the way we think and the style of reading has changed because the Internet is easy to use. In the article “Small Change,” Malcolm Gladwell discusses the pros and cons of social media on activism in modern times as compared through activism in the 1960’s. In Douglas Rushkoff’s documentary “Generation Like,” we gain a deeper understanding of how companies are increasingly working to target and exploit a teen’s quest for identity by empowering them thorough social media. In this paper I will explain how the Internet and social media have influenced
Advancements in technology have been made up to a point where it is changing the way we think about social matters and how we respond and act towards a specific social matter. Everyday our brains adapt to the way technology works and therefore create a different “output” action-- it will change the way we respond to a certain social issue. Comparing present-day “activism” and the activism from the 60s, it can be seen that indeed, technology has played a great role towards our view and definition of activism, and what being an activist really means. Both Nicholas Carr’s essay, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?”, and Malcolm Gladwell’s essay, “Small Change,” both exemplify the way in which technology can be both a positive and negative influence in
In Chuck Klosterman’s book “I Wear the Black Hat”, the chapter “Electric Funeral” he focuses on a special type of villain, the technocrat. A technocrat is technically skilled in computer websites. Klosterman tells us about three “villains” who are technocrats that have made such websites and social media applications. Creating websites or social media applications such as where you can get music illegally, find out information about your favorite celebrity that no one else knows and getting leaked information about what’s happening around the world that’s property of the US government, these websites can cause harm whether emotionally or physically. Klosterman believes we really are powerless to control our future because of the ongoing technocracy that’s coming out within the years.
Technology is advancing very rapidly, but is it hurting or harming us? In the article, “ Is Google Making Us Stupid”, by Nicholas Carr, he examines how the internet has altered people’s mental abilities. Malcolm Gladwell writes an article called, “ Small Change”, in which he draws attention to how the internet has changed the engagement of social activism. Carr’s argument that the internet alters a person's mental abilities, changes their thought process, and destroys their concentration complicates Gladwell’s point that the internet loses the meaning of social activism, changes how activist are defined, and it takes over activism on a social level, because the arguments presented are similar but the outcomes of the internet vary between the
In this article Gladwell makes sure to clearly define his thesis by also acknowledging that not all technology is bad. In fact recognizing that social media is a great way to motivate and inspire while also educating with new ideals, he just thinks that activism through social media is not the same. Gladwell also disagrees with social media activism because there is no structure, and is held together by “weak ties”.
Leonard Pitt brought to light a commonly unknown incident of cyberbullying in his article. He wanted to make the issue of cyberbullying widely known as its a widespread phenomenon the government largely ignored. The rapid rise of the internet's popularity makes regulating it difficult and Pitt wants to bring the issue to the masses and rile them up with Megan's story, so people start caring about the issue and fight for a solution. The power of the crowd mentality can make many things a single person can not do possible, even passing regulation on cyberbullying. The author wants to prevent emotionally vulnerable people from cases of digital exploitation.
Many of these hackers serve time in jail after public trials and rarely deny allegations. The access to technology these crusaders have makes civil disobedience that much more
Lindsay Wickman writes about the formal and informal use of how technology over the years has shaped our government and our overall system of actions. Susan Benesch writes about the permissibility of certain speech, and speech that can potentially incite violence (Benesch 245). In her article, Benesch appeals to the rhetorical concept of LOGOS and PATHOS. She states, "Text messaging is used increasingly to organize riots and massacres in many countries" (Benesch 251).
In Sherry Turkle’s “ How computers change the way we thing” she states “online worlds can provide valuable spaces for identity play.” This goes to show that even man is trapped in the mundane of the real world and is seeking refuge in the online where they can escape the pressures people face during their everyday lives. Technology has chained humankind in many ways. It is now the biggest platform for society to get news, updates on friends, banking, and even shopping.
One of they key issues brought to light in the documentary We Live in Public is the issue of privacy and how it relates to our experience on the Internet. Josh Harris, a young internet entrepreneur, decided to use his millions in the conduct shockingly prophetic experiments that were intended to model the loss of privacy that would occur with increased use of the Internet. In Harris’s experiments, participants were subjected to 24-hour surveillance, losing any semblance of privacy. One of his experiments. Quiet: We Live in Public was a closed, underground community in which the participants were followed by cameras 24/7.
She suggests technology has turned into something to fear rather than enjoy (Cep). For many paragraphs, she writes how the internet plays a part in American lives today, the good and the bad. Her argument begins to develop when she addresses how many people who participate in this movement do so to reconnect with their authentic versions. In the author’s opinion, the unplugging movement is motivated by two things: efficiency and enlightenment (Cep). “Those who seek efficiency rarely want to change their lives,” writes Cep.
News reports are based on current events; however, some news may be, “filtered through the ideological biases,” of the media owners, editors, and reporters themselves (Janda, Berry, Goldman, Schildkraut, and Manna, 2017,163). The question that should be considered when dealing with mass media is whether it’s true or not. Additionally, the problem that is also common with the use of the internet is the lack of network security. In today’s world, many people have the ability to hack into one’s computer obtaining their information, leading to identity theft. This issue must be addressed because it’s one of the components of the government’s
Imagine living in a world without any internet. Imagine the amount of trouble a person would require to go through in order to find out the simplest things. The internet nowadays has become an essential part of almost every human being’s life. Cutting the internet off for just one day my actually leave the world in a state of commotion. Every type of technology may be used in either a way that benefit’s a person, or a way that may harm a person.
