ipl-logo

Analysis Of The Katzenbach Vs. Mcclung Case

727 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Intersectionality and race essay

The commerce clause refers to Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 of the U.S. constitution, which gives congress enumerated power to “regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among several states, and with the Indian tribes”. The Constitution enumerates certain powers for the federal government; the Tenth Amendment provides that any powers that are not enumerated in the Constitution are reserved for the states. Congress has often used the Commerce Clause to justify exercising legislative power. The Katzenbach vs. McClung case is an example of congress using the commerce clause to enact title II of the Civil Rights Act in 1964. The case was about a highway restaurant that was operated in Birmingham, Alabama with a capacity of 220 seats. The restaurant …show more content…

The Katzenbach vs McClung case took place in a restaurant that gets 46% of its food, which was meat from a local supplier that acquired it from outside the state. In addition, the substantial amount of food brought from outside the state will affect the state’s meat industry. Thus, it’s considered interstate commerce, which was mentioned in the U.S. constitution giving congress authority and jurisdiction to regulate the conduct. The other case of Heart of Atlanta Motel vs. U.S. had also an affect on interstate commerce. The motel was located on interstates 75 and 85, which is considered a strategic position. The interstate movement and traveling is considered commerce of more than one state, thus, making it interstate commerce. In fact, The Passenger case settled the argument of traveling being interstate commerce as Mr. Justice McLean stated “That the transportation of passengers is a part of commerce is not now an open question”. Therefore, discriminating against African American will affect interstate commerce, which is considered the congress’s authority under the commerce clause. The Supreme Court used the commerce clause of the constitution to come to their verdict towards both cases. However, the Katzenbach vs McClung case could have had another verdict for many reasons. First, unlike Heart of Atlanta Motel the restaurant served African Americans, which means they are getting the same food but without dining. Therefore, interstate commerce wouldn’t have any affect if African Americans dined or took the food out. Second, the owner could have started obtaining all of his need within the state, thus making him affecting intrastate commerce, which the congress don’t have authority on.

Show More
Related
1933 Words | 8 Pages

Mucolly The Supreme Court settles yet another argument; this time, it is MuCulloch v. Maryland. The end decision helped broaden the roles of the federal government, but not necessarily supplied the government with more power. It also shows that activities that fall into the federal category are taken care of seriously and with a reason.

Read More
991 Words | 4 Pages

Justice Black. His ruling on the case was in favor of the United States but for a different reason. Mr. Justice Black stated “The most immediately relevant parts of Title II of the Act, which, if valid, subject this motel and this restaurant to its requirements are set out below.” meaning the Civil Rights Act is relevant instead of the Commerce Clause (Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States, 2017). The second concurring opinion was from Mr. Justice Douglass where he concluded that that this can not be solely on Commerce Clause like in Edwards v California (Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States, 2017).

Read More
536 Words | 3 Pages

According to the Tenth Amendment of the constitution, “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people”. There have been moments in history where Congress has implemented laws that states felt were unconstitutional. The Constitution gave states the ability to counter the federal government’s power through the Judiciary branch of government, when they feel a law is unconstitutional. The Founders of our nation gave Congress enumerated powers to pass legislation that needs to be abided by all states and citizens. At times Congress will overstep its powers by enacting laws that are unconstitutional and the states have the right to challenge those powers.

Read More
1170 Words | 5 Pages

"The question here is whether a Chinese citizen of the United Stаtes is denied equal protection of the lаws when he is clаssed аmong the colored rаces and furnished fаcilities for education equаl to thаt offered to аll, whether whitе, brown, yеllow, or black. Wеre this a nеw quеstion, it would call for very full argumеnt and considеration, but we think that it is the sаme quеstion which has bеen many timеs decidеd to be within the constitutional powеr of the stаte Legislature to sеttle, without intervеntion of the fedеral courts undеr the fedеral Constitution." The Court аligned this case under the lаnguage of Plessy v. Ferguson, which it sаid involved the "more difficult question" of segregаtion on railway carriers. In Plessy, the Court had listed many cases from state courts, upholding the prаctice of segregаting schools.

Read More
252 Words | 2 Pages

John Marshall’s Supreme Court hearings had a positive effect on the United States. From court cases like McCulloch v. Maryland, declared that the federal courts could decide if state laws were unconstitutional. The McCulloch v. Maryland trial went to the supreme court because Maryland had put a tax in place that too 2% of all assets of the bank or a flat rate of $30,000. John Marshall saw this tax as unconstitutional for the simple fact that people were being denied their property under the state legislature. From the Gibbons v. Ogden case, congress’s power over interstate commerce was strengthened.

Read More
719 Words | 3 Pages

Incorporation Doctrine and McDonald v. Chicago The McDonald v. Chicago case was a crucial decision by the Supreme Court regarding the 2nd Amendment and state law. This case is interesting for a couple of reasons in my opinion. Firstly, the case revolves around legislation of the 2nd Amendment which is a right held dear to myself and many other Americans. Secondly, the case gives an example of the incorporation doctrine being fully applied.

Read More
742 Words | 3 Pages

In the case a New York law had given Fulton and Livingston a monopoly. The court decided that it fell under the commerce clause of the constitution ending the monopolies on waterways. This case expanded the Federal government's power over the economy while decreasing the state’s. Thus showing the Federal government’s involvement with the Industrialist/manufacturing industry. (Source;Document H)

Read More
349 Words | 2 Pages

Empowers Congress to regulate commerce among the states The Constitution empowers Congress to regulate commerce “among the several states,” and no court has ever held that merely living in one of those states qualifies as commerce “among the several states.” If the federal government can force Americans to engage in commerce by buying health insurance, it can insist that they buy automobiles from bankrupt manufacturers, become farmers by growing food in their yards, and exercise three times a week. That is, upholding this power would obliterate the constitutional scheme of limited government.

Read More
1065 Words | 5 Pages

This was a test case that challenged the government to see what they would do to Plessy. The USSC weakened the 14th amendment that the law segregates did not violate the 14th amendment as long as you can take the train (Hoffer, 2014.) This created the “Separate but Equal” law that created the Jim Crow laws. “Jim Crow

Read More
848 Words | 4 Pages

Restaurants,

Read More
806 Words | 4 Pages

He stated that Topeka's racial segregation conflicted the Constitution's “Equal Protection Clause” The federal court did not concur with Brown, hence this led Mr. Brown to seek equality on a national level, which further leads Brown to address his case to the U.S Supreme Court. The U.S Supreme Court concluded that “separate but equal” was not a justifiable clause in regards to

Read More
727 Words | 3 Pages

Several challenges to the law was increased in the courts. In 1883 the Supreme Court ruled in the Civil Rights cases that the act was invalid since it addressed social as opposed to civil rights. Furthermore, the court noticed that the Fourteenth Amendment secured individuals against infringement of their civil rights by states, not by the activities of people, for instance when a owner of a lodging facility declined to lease space to an African American. In the wake of a choice state councils all through the South established laws that legalized racial separation in basically all open spots from hospitals, to schools, even dining places. The Supreme Court supported the Jim Crow laws that authorized racial separation in its historic point of Plessy vs Ferguson in 1896.

Read More
802 Words | 4 Pages

Andrew Jackson’s Effect on the Cherokee Indians and the Trail of Tears In March of 1832, the case of Worcester v. Georgia was ruled in the U.S. Supreme Court. This case nullified a Georgia law that was contrived to control the way that the U.S. citizens accessed the Cherokee country. Chief Justice John Marshall believed that only the federal government should be allowed to do that.

Read More
684 Words | 3 Pages

Another issue was with the owner of Ollie’s Barbe­cue, in Birmingham, Alabama, Discuss the Supreme Court cases that address this topic, such as Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States, Katzenbach v. McClung, and others. These court case rulings marked a way we think about civil rights enforcement under our Constitution. Title II goes to show that any racial discrimination, even private racial discrimination, affects interstate commerce. Many parts of the US Constition are involved within the commernce clause and the civil rights act. To start, the 13th, 14th and 15th amendments where all ratified after the civil war, which gave the congress the powers to enfore civil rights.

Read More
131 Words | 1 Pages

The U.S. Supreme Court developed the “effects on interstate commerce” test to allow interstate activities. This was meant to allow anyone to be accommodated at any hotels or motels. Most commerce is considered “interstate commerce” because most guest come from other states, which made motels and hotels subject to regulations. Although, the Supreme Court ruled that it wasn’t constitutional because it discriminated against certain races. Congress regulated the interstate commerce, being that most motel businesses are from people who are coming in and out of Georgia.

Read More

More about Analysis Of The Katzenbach Vs. Mcclung Case

Related Topics

Open Document