Analysis Of The Philosophical Argument Of Pascal's Wager
Both Socrates and Epicurus have different but similar views on how we should view death, but come to the conclusion that we should not worry when the time comes to die. Within the next paragraphs I will compare and contrast each viewpoint. First of all, Socrates’ views on death are that death should not be feared because nobody but the Gods know what happens to us after we die. Therefore it would not be wise for someone to fear the unknown: “...death is a blessing, for it is one of two things: either the dead are nothing and have no perception of anything, or it is, as we are told, a change and a relocating for the soul to from here to another place.” (40d)
For this disputation, I had the pleasure of arguing against the topic of be it resolved that you can convince a non-believer to affirm the existence of God using philosophical arguments. As the opposing side, Sarah and I counter argued the following: the argument from motion, the ontological argument, Pascal’s Wager, the cosmological argument, the teleological argument, and the moral argument. The argument from motion argues that it is only possible to experience that which exists, and people experience God, therefore God must exist; however it can be counter argued that since faith cannot be demonstrated or experienced, as it is unseen, God cannot exist.
After being sentenced to death, he doesn’t fear from the unknown and instead thinks that death can also be a blessing from god to be away from evil on the earth. Furthermore he says that death can be like taking a trip to another place to get rid of the fake people. Also, it would be not smart to fear about life after death when you are actually alive. Socrates rather chooses to treat the death as a grace of the god and believes that a good person gets good blessings whether he or she is alive or dead. Also the reasoning at the end of the quotes shows his philosophy that an assumption cannot be always predicted correct or accurate if it is not proved in
Juvenile crime increased 13 percent nationwide, because of not having curfews. Multiple court cases have taken on the subject of teen curfews with varying results. In the book The Outsiders by S.E Hinton, the subject would curfews have helped or would not have helped the greasers. The Outsiders is a novel, that tells the story of the Curtis brother’s life. They are part of the Greaser Gang, and don’t have curfews.
He mentioned that he would worship the idea of asking them questions, discuss his sufferings to others. He believed that he would win either way because he would be living a better life of finding out who is wide and he could continue his search for true and false knowledge. His arguments are valid because after he states his beliefs, he explains why he thinks what he thinks to be true. He created the theory of, “Either death is a state of nothing ness and utter unconsciousness, or, as men say, there is a change and migration of the soul from this world by another” (Plato).
I am writing this letter to support Jessica Evans’ application to the Master of Arts in Psychology program (Industrial/Organizational concentration) at the University of West Florida. I have served as Ms. Evans professor and academic advisor since fall 2016. Currently, she is enrolled in my Research Methods and Statistics II course and is working with me for Psychological Research and Investigations. Over the past semester, I watched Ms. Evans work as a full-time student, work an internship, and work a part-time job all while earning a 3.529 GPA. As a result, I observed her strengths to be determination and hard work.
Gilgamesh’s self awareness that he eventually acquires greatly mirrors Socratics’ belief about death; that death is out of our hands, so we might as live well and examine our lives until we are
“…if I disobeyed the oracle because I was afraid of death: then I should be fancying that I was wise when I was not wise. For this fear of death is indeed the pretence of wisdom, and not real wisdom, being the appearance of the unknown: since no one knows whether death, which they in their fear apprehend to be the greatest evil, may not be the greatest good” (Apology, 29a-29b). This potent statement not only highlights Socrates’ wisdom, it effectively makes use of his belief that he is wise because he knows nothing. By saying that he knows nothing of the afterlife, it gives him the reason to illustrate to his audience that he cannot fear what he does not know.
Pascal’s wager states that believing in God will either lead to infinite gain or finite loss while disbelief leads to infinite loss and finite gain depending on where God exists or not. It is not a way of proving if God exists but to say that believing in God has more benefits than disbelief in God. I don’t believe that the it is that simple with many different factors affecting the gain and loss. The wager itself is made with the idea of the christian God but there are so many religions out there with different beliefs and even different amounts of gods.
In spite of that, I though the way that Socrates explained his idea with a series of events was very interesting. I perfectly understood the beginning of the story, but I ceased to find that connection between the beginning and the end. Since the ideas of Socrates were very complex and difficult to understand, this story made think too much in order to make a logical conclusion However, what I understood the most was "how humans adapt to everything. The perception of reality may be different for each person depending on the situation they find themselves in. Reality is subject to change as time goes by, your perspective of reality will be different from that of others depending on the events that you experience.
Throughout centuries, traditions and rituals have had the ability to control one’s behavior. In Shirley Jackson’s, “The Lottery”, she tells the reader of a small village. On the surface, this community may seem relatively normal. However, despite the picturesque appeal, this falsely serene village has a distinct deceitful flaw. On June 27th, every year, a lottery takes place.
Socrates is quoted as stating, “An unexamined life is a life not worth living” (38 a). Socrates was a founding figure of western philosophy, and a stable for many ideas. He lived in Athens, Greece teaching his students, like Plato, questioning politics, ethical choices, and many other things in Greek society. In the Trial and death of Socrates: Four Dialogues by Plato, it explores the abstract questioning Socrates had towards many of the normal social properties, which led to his trial, resulting in his death. The most important aspects discussed in the dialogues is the questioning of what is pious and impious, what it means to be wise, and good life.
Socrates states that a good philosopher should not fear death, but rather embrace it and look forward to it. This is also where he comes out with the four claims of the separation of the soul and the body. With this point Socrates is trying to explain to Cebes, Simmias, and the others in the room that the soul is everlasting and outlives every body that it is ever in. They agree that the soul is long lasting but does not live forever. This is the end for Socrates as him and Crito head to the bath chamber and return to say goodbye to his three sons and the women of the household.
Socrates’ original argument was not valid or sound. The premises were corrected but the argument needed another premise to make the conclusion true. Adding premise two takes away any confusion there was to what immortality meant. Since Socrates’ spent almost the entire book creating a just person and a just city the information about what is good and bad for a soul makes sense. It also makes sense that those things cannot destroy the soul because injustice and other vices could only lead the body to make poor choices and possibly get sick or die from those poor choices.
Plato’s view on death According to Plato, Socrates didn’t fear death. He stopped fearing death when God ordered him to live the life of a philosopher. “No one knows whether death may not be the greatest of all blessings for a man, yet men fear it as if they knew that it is the greatest of all evils.” He says that this is just as bad as thinking that you’re wise, when you’re actually not.
More about Analysis Of The Philosophical Argument Of Pascal's Wager
Comparing Socrates And Epicurus Views On Death
934 Words | 4 PagesWager's Argument For The Existence Of God
378 Words | 2 PagesWhat Is The Important Quotes From The Crucible
483 Words | 2 PagesCurfew In S. E. Hinton's The Outsiders
810 Words | 4 PagesArguments For Plato's Apology
376 Words | 2 PagesJessica Evans Application Letter Sample
264 Words | 2 PagesWhat Are Socrates Ideas About Death
564 Words | 3 PagesFear Of Death In Plato's Apology
1115 Words | 5 PagesPascal's Wager Has More Benefit Than Believing In God
641 Words | 3 PagesLight And Darkness In Plato's Allegory Of The Cave
676 Words | 3 PagesThe Lottery Argumentative Essay
691 Words | 3 PagesAnalysis Of Socrates: Four Dialogues, By Plato
1595 Words | 7 PagesTrial And Death Of Socrates Analysis
1191 Words | 5 PagesPlato's Argument On Why The Soul Is Alive
524 Words | 3 PagesExemplification Essay: Plato's View On Death
1005 Words | 5 Pages