ipl-logo

Analysis Of The Vonlee Titlow V. Case

513 Words3 Pages

Vonlee Titlow was tried for murder when she and her aunt Billie Rodgers killed Billie's wealthy husband Donald Rodgers. The prosecution Presented Titlow with a plea bargain of manslaughter, for her testimony against her aunt Billie in her trial. Shortly before the Trial of Titlow's aunt Billie, she had a conversation with an officer, who instructed her not to take the plea if she was, in fact, innocent. After this conversation, Titlow got rid of her current lawyer for new counsel in her case. Toca who was brought in as this new counsel fought to get the length of the plea reduced to a lower term. The prosecution rejected this Plea and withdrew the original plea since Titlow would not self-incriminate in the case against Billie. Without the testimony of Titlow, Billie was acquitted. When Titlow was tried for murder in the first degree the court could not get a conviction for first-degree murder but was able to get a conviction for murder in the second degree, and would be facing 20 …show more content…

The Michigan court of appeals denied the motion on the grounds that she had told Toca she was innocent on top of passing a polygraph on questions regarding of her innocence. After the Appeal was rejected by the state of Michigan, Titlow filed for federal habeas corpus. The District court reviewed the case and found that The State court of Michigan appeals court had satisfied the requirements set forth in the Antiterrorism and effective death penalty act of 1996, and were correct in their judgment. The sixth circuit of appeals however viewed the case differently and reversed this decision. Doing so on the grounds that there was no evidence support that Titlow knew what the consequences for withdrawing the plea. The State at this time was forced to re-offer the plea to Titlow. Even though no testimony against Billie could be provided, due to her death during Titlows legal

Show More
Related

Bush V. Schiavo Case Study

551 Words | 3 Pages

Both Michael and the Schindlers presented valid evidence that issued extensive written order that would authorize the discontinuance of Theresa's artificial life support. This issue required the Court to decide the "constitutionality of a law" and after considering the arguments of the parties, the constitutional issues raised. This procedural history is important because it provides backdrop to the "Legislature's enactment of the challenged law" and separation of powers. However, the procedural history of the Governor's assertion that chapter 2003-418, Laws of Florida, was passed to protect the due process rights of Theresa and other individuals who had the same conflict as she did. After the trial, the court found the evidence convincing and came to the conclusion that if Theresa were competent and conscious, she too, would probably cease the prolonging life procedures if it were her own decision.

Read More

Newsom V. Albemarle Case

106 Words | 1 Pages

You may have heard about the $150,000 shirt in 2004 that was owned by Alan Newsom. The shirt was one of the reasons for Newsom v. Albemarle case that went to court. The shirt Alan Newsom wore was from an NRA shooting sports camp. He wore the shirt to school in hopes of encouraging other students to go to the camp, but he was told to turn the shirt inside out for the rest of the day. Later that same day Alan wanted to take them to court.

Read More

Dothard V. Rawlinson Case Study

248 Words | 1 Pages

Dothard v. Rawlinson the facts in the case are listed below. Rawlinson was the plaintiff; she was a 22-year-old with some college training in correctional psychology and applied for a job as a prison counselor trainee in the state of Alabama. The current statute of Alabama required that the state correctional employees had to maintain a minimum weight of 120 pounds and to be the lowest height of 5' 2". The position of a prison counselor primary duty was to keep the security and to be able to have control over the inmates through a constant observation and supervision.

Read More

Summary Of The Supreme Court Case Of Brady Vs. Maryland

688 Words | 3 Pages

The male had cuts to both his wrists and his hands which were determined during autopsy to be defense wounds. The woman was found guilty and sentenced to jail. Later, the defense tried to argue to the courts that the male victim had previous assault charges with weapons and was prone to violence. The court dismissed these findings, as they were not relevant to the case at hand and did not bring any new findings into the case. The defense tried to argue under the grounds that if the jury were to hear about the previous charges, then they might have not found her guilty.

Read More

State Vs Loza Case Study

1303 Words | 6 Pages

Passing determination number one charged murder to escape identification and capture, R.C. 2929.04(A)(3); demise detail number two affirmed "course of direct" killings, R.C. 2929.04(A)(5); and capital punishment detail number three claimed kill amid an irritated burglary, R.C. 2929.04(A)(7). Appealing party argued not liable to every one of the charges. Litigant deferred his entitlement to a jury trial and continued to trial under the watchful eye of a three-judge board. Amid round of questioning of the state's last witness, the safeguard moved for a legal mistake on the premise that the expressed had neglected to reveal certain exculpatory confirmation amid discovery. Over the state's protest, the court allowed a legal blunder without partiality.

Read More

Simon Gittany Is Charged With The Murder Of Lisa Harnum

686 Words | 3 Pages

HER HONOUR: "Simon Gittany is charged with the murder of Lisa Cecilia Harnum on the 30th of July 2011. He has pleaded not guilty to that charge. On his application, I ordered that he be tried by a judge alone. The trial proceeded before me over four weeks from 21 October 2013. This judgment records my verdict and my reasons for reaching that verdict."

Read More

Lizzie Borden Research Paper

641 Words | 3 Pages

While in custody she could not repeat the same story about her whereabouts, making her even more suspicious (Linder 1995). Given that Lizzie Borden did not have a lawyer at the time of testimony it was not admissible in court (Linder 1995). The police speculated that the murder had to be someone from the house and since Lizzie Borden’s sister was out of town the blame fell on her (Linder 1995). During the trial the police did not find any evidence against Lizzie Borden therefore, just after one hour of deliberations the jury decided that she was not guilty (Linder

Read More

Gratwick V. Johnson Case Analysis

1665 Words | 7 Pages

In 1945, the High Court of Australia heard the case of Gratwick v Johnson and ultimately decided to dismiss the appeal in a unanimous decision by the Judges. While different reasoning was employed, all five judges drew the conclusion that the appeal should be dismissed as the statute the defendant was charged under was inconsistent with s.92 of the Australian Constitution. To provide some context for this case in 1944, Dulcie Johnson was charged with an offence against the National Security Act 1939-1943 in that she did contravene par.3 of the Restriction of Interstate Passenger Transport Order by travelling from South Australia to Western Australia by rail. In brief terms par.3 of the Restriction of Interstate Passenger Transport Order provided that no person shall, without a valid permit, travel from state to state or territory.

Read More

The1803 Court Case Analysis

185 Words | 1 Pages

The ruling made by Chief Justice John Marshall in the1803 court case Marbury v. Madison was consider significance because it established the power of the judicial branch with the principle that the Supreme Court may declare an act of Congress void if it is considered inconsistent with the United States Constitution. This means that the court has the power to decide which laws are considered constitutional in what is referred to as judicial review. Judicial review in the courts, states that the judicial branch can review laws created by the legislative branch and establish if they are constitutional or not. The separation of power provided a type of check and balance to insure that no one branch in the government hold all the power and that

Read More

Brief Analysis Of R Vs. Oakes Case In Canada

507 Words | 3 Pages

The Supreme Court of Canada struck down section 8 of the NCA as it was inconsistent with section 11(d) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms as it violated the presumption of innocence and David Oakes was acquitted of the charges laid against him. In its ruling, the Supreme Court of Canada created the Oakes test to determine how to assess whether

Read More

Cantwell V Connecticut Case Study

1629 Words | 7 Pages

I A. B. Cantwell v Connecticut (1940) D. Jesse Cantwell and his son going door to door in their neighborhood talking badly to people about the religion of catholicism which lead to two people becoming angry. This leads to the Cantwells being arrested for breaking a local ordinance that requires a permit for solicitation and also for encouraging an infraction of the peace E. Were the Cantwells first amendment free speech rights violated when they were religious views were suppressed and did they encourage an infraction of the peace or not. F.The court ruled that you could restrict general solicitation but you could not put limitation based on religion and that if you did so it would be trying to silence someone's views.

Read More

Compare And Contrast Brady Vs United States

157 Words | 1 Pages

Alford gained much more by pleading than by a trial. The Court held that based on a strong factual basis for the plea that the state showed

Read More

The Llyod Rayney Case

1110 Words | 5 Pages

Introduction- Case Summary This case report is about the Llyod Rayney case. This case took place in Western Australia. Lloyd Patrick Rayney was accused of killing his wife Corryn Veronica Ann Rayney.

Read More

Analysis Of The Gregg V. Georgia Case

697 Words | 3 Pages

In this research paper, I will be talking about the moratorium of the death penalty, also known as, the capital punishment for criminals who have committed a serious crime. Following the discussion of Gregg v. Georgia Case, that happened in 1976, Furman v. Georgia, and how they each contributed to the moratorium of the death penalty. Later, comparing and contrasting about some aggravated assaults and mitigating assaults and how they differ from each other. Also about the direct causes of the moratorium of the death penalty. Then explain the indirect effects of the moratorium and the procedure of capital punishment and the policy of the death penalty.

Read More

Muller V. Oregon: The Supreme Court Case Of Brandeis

975 Words | 4 Pages

In 1908 he took on a case that would forever change the way cases could be present in court. Representing Oregon in the case Muller v. Oregon, Brandeis once again found himself in front of the Supreme Court. At issue was whether it was constitutional for a state law to limit the hours that female workers could work. Discovering a flaw in the current statue that considered it unreasonable infringement of freedom of contract between employers and their employees for a state to set any wages or hours legislation. By reviewing previous cases where the contract was limited when factors of a real or substantial relation to public health or welfare were at hand (The Brandeis Brief).

Read More

More about Analysis Of The Vonlee Titlow V. Case

Open Document