ipl-logo

Analysis: Why College Athletes Should Not Be Paid

836 Words4 Pages

When a student gets accepted to their dream school to play their favorite sport, should their college give them their scholarship along with pay for playing on the team? College’s have received very vocal opinions on the topic of paying their student-athletes or to go about as usual business and not pay their students on the school 's teams. College coaches are training teams for sports that receive an immense amount of revenue for their school, their pay is at an all time high. What qualifies a student to receive their scholarship along with pay for being on the team? Using the following texts provided, the claim that this writing piece supports is that colleges are not obligated to pay their student-athletes. To begin with, when a student-athlete is accepted into college or university, they receive a generous scholarship from the school for them to play on their team in the designated sport. The scholarship is …show more content…

The NCAA’s revenue is so immense, they are easily capable to pay the athletes in college. “Although the NCAA reels in over $800 million per year, 81 percent of which comes from television and marketing-rights fees, the organization continues to be non-profit” (Text 4, lines 55-56). With the ability to have a yearly income of over $800 million per year, and the coaches obtaining a salary of $1-7 million, there is no reason of why the NCAA cannot pay the athletes. In a way, it is peculiar on why that with all of the hard work and time put into training and performing, along with obtaining an education, they are not paid for their work. Overall, through the texts that were provided, it is apparent why college athletes should not receive pay for their part in college sports. Through the very generous scholarships, and the exposure that will land them a job in the professional area of sports, it is plenty enough for the

Open Document