ipl-logo

Analytical Essay: The Most Dangerous Game By Richard Connell

406 Words2 Pages

The Most Dangerous Game Essay Brody W. 1A Richard Connell’s The Most Dangerous Game is a classic story about good vs. evil, hunter vs. hunted, etc. This story has a very suspenseful tone. Connell always keeps the reader on his toes. The set of main characters is very simple; a protagonist (Rainsford) and an antagonist (Zaroff). Although these characters are polar opposites, they are also very alike at the same time. Sanger Rainsford is an extremely cunning and intelligent hunter. He is witty and has a sense of humor. Rainsford believes that the world is made up of two groups, the hunters and the hunted. Throughout the story, the reader can see the change in Rainsford as he converts from the hunter to the hunted. Rainsford’s wartime experiences …show more content…

His madness derives from a life of luxury, riches, and a militarist lifestyle. He remains this way throughout the story. He has a delirious desire to make others suffer for his own enjoyment. The reader can see a sense of insanity when viewing Zaroff because of his way of treating the killing people as a “game”. He is incapable of perceiving the difference between man and beast. All of these characteristics make General Zaroff a deranged, malicious human being. Even though these characters are completely divergent, there are qualities that these two characters share. Both Zaroff and Rainsford are smart, intelligent hunters and they are both very strategic. Even though the reader can see Rainsford as the hero, he ends up just like Zaroff in the end of the story, able to sleep soundly after ruthlessly killing another human being. Both of these men are manipulative, strategic, and feral. To conclude, Zaroff and Rainsford are both very different, but also analogous at the same time. They both have their own qualities that separate them from one another, but they also have characteristics that make them seem like the same person. Even though Rainsford goes through a change and Zaroff doesn’t, Rainsford ends up just like Zaroff. At the end of the story, both characters end up as the same, barbaric type of human

Show More
Related

Control Of Emotions In The Most Dangerous Game By Richard Connell

370 Words | 2 Pages

In the short story The Most Dangerous Game, the author Richard Connell shows that Rainsford needs control of his emotions, patience , and expert hunting and decision making skills in order to defeat Zaroff. Rainsford needs to gain control of his emotions to outthink Zaroff, who symbolizes Rainsfords "steep hill". When he finds that he is going to be hunted his natural instinct is to run and panic, but then he stops to look around and get a grip on the task at hand. Then at a critical moment when Zaroff finds him in a tree, Rainsford panics again because he realizes Zaroff is on his trail and is toying with him. Once again, he gains control of his emotions and formulates a plan.

Read More

Mla Citation For The Most Dangerous Game

205 Words | 1 Pages

He is greeted by a man named General Zaroff. A hunter like him but something is off about him. He hunts Humans. The only animal that can reason. Rainsford is in a terrible situation.

Read More

Rainford And Zaroff In The Most Dangerous Game By Richard Connell

168 Words | 1 Pages

In the short story “The Most Dangerous Game” written by Richard Connell it describes a hunter on an island isolated from the world. The man is forced to be prey for a hunter that hunts men. There are differences in the characters from the book to the movie. First off, there is a woman and a brother along with other servants are at the chateau in the movie. This makes it feel less isolated and more populated, but simultaneously it makes it feel more dangerous.

Read More

Compare And Contrast Zaroff And Rainsford In The Most Dangerous Game

740 Words | 3 Pages

All he was set out to do was hunt jaguars, but that all went down the drain after meeting his hunting guide Zaroff; listening to what they were actually going to be hunting change everything. A battle for survival strikes Rainsford suddenly. As a result, Rainsford is forced to go out of his comfort zone to win a battle he never thought he 'd be in. While playing this dangerous game Rainsford demonstrates that he 's smart, serious, and he also shows perseverance throughout the story. For a duration of the story, Rainsford displayed smartness by creating a variety of plans to secure a win for the game he was playing.

Read More

Examples Of Rainsford A Dynamic Character In The Most Dangerous Game

783 Words | 4 Pages

At the beginning of the story, Rainsford is apathetic towards hunting animals and sees no problem with doing so. In the exposition of the story, Rainsford is a big-game hunter, and enjoys hunting

Read More

Compare And Contrast The Most Dangerous Game And Young Goodman Brown

1424 Words | 6 Pages

English 102 Fiction Essay Compare and Contrast: Young Goodman Brown vs The Most Dangerous Game Justin C. Blanton Liberty University English 102 Fiction Essay Compare and Contrast: Young Goodman Brown vs The Most Dangerous Game Both stories are about fears in men.

Read More

Rainsford Vs Zaroff Essay

616 Words | 3 Pages

Both Rainsford and Zaroff share common passions, skills and ideology. Initially, there is admiration between both characters, but their similarities become the cause of the conflict. Rainsford murders Zaroff and has put an end to the murderous human

Read More

Character Relationships In Richard Connell's The Most Dangerous Game

721 Words | 3 Pages

Zaroff has more power throughout the story because he is always willing to kill Rainsford, whether it be while engaged in the hunt or for refusing to play the game. “They are let out at seven every night. If anyone should try to get into-or-out of it something extremely regrettable would happen to him” (Connell

Read More

Compare And Contrast High Noon And The Most Dangerous Game

771 Words | 4 Pages

“The world is made up of two classes- the hunters and the hunted” (Connel 212) . This shows a relationship between hunters and the hunted. In the beginning Rainsford and Zaroff are shown to be of the same value. This is, until the story unravels into Rainsford being put in the hunted position. One focuses on types of people and, the other is focused on

Read More

The Most Dangerous Game Conflict Analysis

538 Words | 3 Pages

In his short story, “The most Dangerous Game,” Richard Connell conveys conflict between Rainsford and General Zaroff as they face each other on a dangerous hunt. General Zaroff has offered Rainsford his freedom if he survives the three days of the hunt. During the build-up of the main conflict, the hunt, certain characteristics can be picked up from the characters. The author uses the changing conflict to portray aspects of the characters’ traits by describing the characters’ emotions or actions because it connects to how that character reacts.

Read More

How Would You Compare And Contrast The Relationship Between Rainsford And Zaroff

805 Words | 4 Pages

When I first met Rainsford, I thought of him as a heartless and inconsiderate person. As Whitney encouraged Rainsford to believe that all animals have feelings and should not be killed, Rainford responded with “Bah! They’ve no understanding” (Connell 1). Whitney was attempting to change Rainsfords point of view on hunting animals, yet Rainsford ignored his statement and had his mind set on only himself and what he loved to do. Although Rainsford is selfish and rude during the beginning of the story, his personality and attitude greatly differs when compared to the ending.

Read More

Comparison: The Hunger Games And President Snow

512 Words | 3 Pages

Inhumane. This word, inhumane describes both General Zaroff from The Most Dangerous game, and it also describes President Snow, from The Hunger Games. Both General Zaroff and President Snow were sick people, and had terrible theories. Although General Zaroff and President snow are not exactly the same, they have many similarities and differences.

Read More

The Most Dangerous Game Theme Essay

653 Words | 3 Pages

Throughout the story the reader sees how Zaroff “plays” with Rainsford as he hunts him and not once does Zaroff think he will lose to Rainsford. This is a clear example of the theme to never underestimate your opponent skills or the underdog may overtake you. Connell illustrates this theme through foreshadowing, irony, and, man vs. man. To help us visualize, foreshadowing shows how Rainsford, being the underdog, will overtake Zaroff who underestimates Rainsford. Although Rainsford is not seen as being the weaker link, Rainsford showed he did not pity those below him: “‘Who cares how a jaguar feels all they understand is fear.’

Read More

Sanger Rainsford Character Analysis

624 Words | 3 Pages

Rainford exposes his selfishness and lack of empathy by saying, “‘Be a realist. The world is made up of two classes-the hunters and the huntees. Luckily you and I are hunters’”(2). His actions throughout the story show his cruelty too. Rainsfords profession is killing animals, and while he does

Read More

General Zaroff In The Most Dangerous Game

588 Words | 3 Pages

General Zaroff is different, to say the least, in Richard Connell’s book, “The Most Dangerous Game.” Rainsford is stranded on a deserted island, or so he thinks. Rainsford comes upon a mansion that is owned by General Zaroff. He knows of Rainsford, who is a renowned author of a book about the hunt, as well as everything and everywhere Rainsford has hunted. General Zaroff is also a hunter, but he goes to the extreme.

Read More

More about Analytical Essay: The Most Dangerous Game By Richard Connell

Related Topics

Open Document