ipl-logo

Analyzing Philippa Foot's Arguments Of Active Euthanasia

1412 Words6 Pages

I am writing to you to offer you advice to assist you in determining the next steps in your father’s circumstance. To understand more about the dilemma confronting you, exploring what certain philosophers have concluded are right courses of action and thoughts. The first philosopher James Rachels uses his paper to disprove the assumption that active euthanasia is morally different from passive euthanasia. Then, another philosopher, Philippa Foot, hopes to argue against Rachels hoping to refute his conclusion. However, this letter references both their views to express why helping your father end his life is the most appropriate action to pursue.
To understand the ongoing debate about active and passive euthanasia, we must first look into Rachel’s …show more content…

Furthermore, because this case involves children, a unique bias from the obligations we have for children is present. The conclusion of this case is that both of them are guilty, but not necessarily always bad, including the two rescues and Smith/Jones case. With arguments mounted on both sides, I still prefer active euthanasia in your father’s case. Initially, your father has given up his right to life Foot mentions, to alleviate his suffering, following your father's right to service is doing what is best for him and following his right to death, overriding Foot’s idea of the right of non-interference since constraining him to suffer violates his rights of service. Moreover, actively ending your father's life does not mean that passively doing so is better. The reason for agreeing with Rachels is because I believe that Foot’s analysis is a narrow account, covering only a small variety of cases, and does not offer flexibility in specific circumstances. The first is the argument about euthanasia; it does not account for suffering nor mention if suffering permits a patient to continue with active euthanasia. Furthermore, if the agent of the suffering is untreatable[cancer] and will inevitably kill that person, then their right to service is positive and ending the person’s life is in both our interests: the patient’s wishes are fulfilled, and the agent to assist them. However, this is not true here since the agent is not interfering with the person’s life. In addition, Foot does not include parental obligations we have towards our loved ones: hear, give back, and fulfill what is best for them. In your case, if your father requests the injection, you should as a family member fulfill the duty. For these reasons, I hope you consider all this information and choose active

Show More
Related
1744 Words | 7 Pages

Dan Brock and James Rachel both make persuasive arguments regarding the controversial dilemma "Is Euthanasia morally permissible?". Of the two articles, however, Dan Brock's analysis of the key arguments and resolution of the points brought against euthanasia is the stronger argument compared to James Rachel's moral argument that active euthanasia is permissible because passive is. The main problem lying with euthanasia is simply put, do we as a society weigh actual life more than quality of life. Euthanasia however, should be, and is based upon quality of life, which is why it's morally permissible as a course of action. Dan Brock's Voluntary Active Euthanasia

Read More
559 Words | 3 Pages

“The question of whether or not euthanasia is ethical revolves around the meaning of human existence. Those who favor euthanasia argue that human life only has meaning when the individual is free from unendurable physical and mental suffering” (“Preface to ‘Is Euthanasia Ethical?’” 1). Physician-assisted suicide is a practice that was first introduced by Dr.Jack Kevorkian in June of 1990 (“Chronology of Dr.Jack Kevorkian’s Life”, 1), in which a patient is either injected with life-ending drugs or given a carbon monoxide mask to place over their mouth and nose in order to end his or her life (Jackson 3).While this practice may sound harsh and unethical, it is the exact opposite; assisted suicide grants terminally-ill patients the option to end their suffering early and to avoid the loss of meaning to their life (“Preface to ‘Is Euthanasia Ethical?’”, 1). When a person is faced with the possibility of suffering through a dehumanizing and humiliating death, they should always be given the option of legally undergoing physician-assisted suicide; this option benefits both the patient and their family by allowing the patient a chance to end their life in a euphoric state, eliminating the costs of long term care, and to allow a morally acceptable

Read More
381 Words | 2 Pages

Euthanasia Euthanasia is the act helps people to kill or die themselves to relieve suffering and pain by intentionally. There are two types of euthanasia, which are the active euthanasia and passive euthanasia. The active euthanasia is the proses of killing people who are suffering to reduce that pain or suffering. Also, the passive euthanasia is to reduce pain, but it is the proses of stopping from helping or doing something that might save that person live. A lot of people concerned that the only permissible euthanasia is passive euthanasia, but according to James Rachels both passive and active euthanasia are permissible, and both of them are equal morally.

Read More
1032 Words | 5 Pages

The first argument presents itself as a justification for why Euthanasia is seen as morally permissible in the case of performing Euthanasia on a patient who is at the late adulthood stage of life. The author of this article, Charles Camosy, explains and challenges this argument. 1) the duty to die increases as one gets older 2) which means that as we live longer, one’s family could be susceptible to having to pay large amounts of healthcare expenses 3)Therefore, an older adult who is near death, should autonomously chose Euthanasia as a solution (Camosy, 2014). This argument stems from Camosy’s explanation of the autonomous argument of Euthanasia, that as humans, we have a right to be free from pain and suffering.

Read More
667 Words | 3 Pages

Political Party The Freedom and Equality Party is straightforward, we want to work towards an America that is free and equal. Our main goal is equality, meaning equality among races, religion, sexual orientation, and genders. At the moment, our country is divided, we need a party whose views are strong, although there are pressing problems abroad such as ISIS, we need to focus on mending ourselves first. We pledge to work towards a strong, stable, and equal America for everyone. Equality among everyone will surely bring peace and help us prosper together as a country.

Read More
1252 Words | 6 Pages

Assisted suicide is a rather controversial issue in contemporary society. When a terminally ill patient formally requests to be euthanized by a board certified physician, an ethical dilemma arises. Can someone ethically end the life of another human being, even if the patient will die in less than six months? Unlike traditional suicide, euthanasia included multiple individuals including the patient, doctor, and witnesses, where each party involved has a set of legal responsibilities. In order to understand this quandary and eventually reach a conclusion, each party involved must have their responsibilities analyzed and the underlying guidelines of moral ethics must be investigated.

Read More
1242 Words | 5 Pages

Euthanasia, a sensitive topic for most; some are for it, some are against it. The issue that is presented in James Rachel’s “Active and Passive Euthanasia” is an attempt to determine if assisted death is morally acceptable or flat out immoral. This controversial topic is a subject that comes up frequently in the medical field. Should one be able to self inflict death? Some say it is morally wrong while others believe otherwise.

Read More
937 Words | 4 Pages

The possible legalization of euthanasia can cause a great disturbance in how people view life and death and the simplicity of how they would treat it. "There are many fairly severely handicapped people for whom a simple, affectionate life is possible." (Foot, p. 94) As demonstrated, the decision of terminating a person 's life is a very fragile and difficult one, emotionally and mentally. Nevertheless, it’s a choice we can make if it is passive euthanasia being expressed.

Read More
1188 Words | 5 Pages

This essay suggest that active euthanasia should be supported. This essay elaborate the statement in three argument. Firstly, according to utilitarianism, active euthanasia can produces greatest net pleasure and happiness. Secondly, some philosopher Mary Anne Warren and Frances Kamm states that the practice of active euthanasia is kind and merciful, which allow people

Read More
1824 Words | 8 Pages

The right to die is among the most widely debated controversies present in today’s society. It is a concept based upon the refusal of extensive medical procedures that would otherwise prolong the lives of terminally-ill patients. This form of suicide is carried out by means of voluntary euthanasia, prescribed by the doctor only when approval on behalf of the family has been received. Those who support this procedure reason that those in possession of the life at stake should be able to choose when to terminate it. Additionally, physician-assisted suicide provides an alternative to prolonged suffering and significantly lowers medical expenses.

Read More
714 Words | 3 Pages

I will identify many issues regarding Euthanasia through 65 year old Godelieva De Troyer’s case and apply two ethical theories to the dilemma at hand. I will argue for and against the topic of Euthanasia and what society sees it as. The first ethical theory will be Kantian ethics; the second will be utilitarianism, repeating the same arguments. I will conclude with a statement/evaluation on whether I believe Euthanasia is ethical or not and whether the doctor should be punished for assisting Tom Mortier’s mom’s euthanasia without having any experience on how to deal with mental health patients and also whether depressed patients such as Troyer who was physically healthy should be able to make the choice of wanting to end their life, or should they suffer in silence until one day they decide to commit suicide themselves. I can say this without any hesitation because if we were to look at the statistics, most cases of deep depression eventually lead to suicide.

Read More
1731 Words | 7 Pages

THE EUTHANASIA CONTROVERSY Summary Euthanasia has constantly been a heated debate amongst commentators, such as the likes of legal academics, medical practitioners and legislators for many years. Hence, the task of this essay is to discuss the different faces minted on both sides of the coin – should physicians and/or loved ones have the right to participate in active euthanasia? In order to do so, the essay will need to explore the arguments for and against legalizing euthanasia, specifically active euthanasia and subsequently provide a stand on whether or not it should be an accepted practice.

Read More
1234 Words | 5 Pages

Many pro-euthanasia believers will use the autonomy argument and debate the opinion that patients should have the right to choose when and how to they want to die. In an article in the Houston Chronicle, Judge Reinhardt ruled on this topic by stating “a competent, terminally-ill adult, having lived nearly the full measure of his life, has a strong liberty interest in choosing a dignified and humane death… (De La Torre).” However, dignity cannot be measured by the level of pain or the speed in which the individual dies, because it is already a characteristic of a person’s worth as a human being (Middleton). Allowing a patient to live their life to the fullest until the very end is surely a more humane and dignified death then cutting that life short in fear of what it is coming through the practice of euthanasia. While death for these patients can be a sad ending, it does not have to condemn a person to a remaining life of sadness and negativity.

Read More
1016 Words | 5 Pages

INTRODUCTION Euthanasia alludes to the act of deliberately close a life keeping in mind the end goal to assuage torment and enduring. There are different euthanasia laws in each country. The British House of Lords Select Committee on Medical Ethics defines euthanasia as "a deliberate intervention undertaken with the express intention of ending a life, to relieve intractable suffering".[1] In the Netherlands, euthanasia is understood as "termination of life by a doctor at the request of a patient"". Euthanasia is sorted in diverse ways, which incorporate voluntary, non-voluntary, or automatic.

Read More
1149 Words | 5 Pages

The act of euthanasia, whether active or passive, is heavily obstructed in the medical field. Through medical ethics, the act of passive euthanasia is condoned by withholding treatment and thus, allowing the patient to die. Without any direct contact with the patient, the doctor is not considered as the cause of death. Thus, the medical field views passive euthanasia as of lesser and more permissible value in comparison to active euthanasia. In the statement made by the House of Delegates of the American Medical Association, they perceive this as contrary to mercy killing, as it is, the cessation of the employment of extraordinary means to prolong the life of the body when there is irrefutable evidence that biological death is imminent is the decision of the patient and/or his immediate family.

Read More

More about Analyzing Philippa Foot's Arguments Of Active Euthanasia

Related Topics

Open Document