ipl-logo

Autonomous Argument Of Euthanasia

1032 Words5 Pages

The first argument presents itself as a justification for why Euthanasia is seen as morally permissible in the case of performing Euthanasia on a patient who is at the late adulthood stage of life. The author of this article, Charles Camosy, explains and challenges this argument. 1) the duty to die increases as one gets older 2) which means that as we live longer, one’s family could be susceptible to having to pay large amounts of healthcare expenses 3)Therefore, an older adult who is near death, should autonomously chose Euthanasia as a solution (Camosy, 2014). This argument stems from Camosy’s explanation of the autonomous argument of Euthanasia, that as humans, we have a right to be free from pain and suffering. Therefore, we have the freedom to choose when and how we die. …show more content…

The second premise continues that allusion by mentioning that we are not only getting older, but we are living longer. This causes families to do things such as put their family members in nursing homes, extended visits to the hospital, large amounts of medications, and trips to several specialists that put financial strain on the younger, healthier members of the families. The last premise is an answer to the issues that the second premise mentioned. Camosy challenges the last premise by asking the questions: Would an elder’s “choice” to die truly be autonomous and free at this point? Or are their choice forced by underlying social factors, including the duty to die, and providing financial, emotional and physical relief for family and

Open Document