ipl-logo

Assisted Suicide Arguments Against Euthanasia

881 Words4 Pages

However, opposition to assisted dying are concerned about a slippery slope, where patient’s choices could be abused. Beyond the opposition to assisted dying based on concerns about potential abuse is the threat of the so-called slippery slope. According to opposition’s theory, legalization of euthanasia and assisted suicide would be followed by non-voluntary euthanasia, involving patients whose current personal desires could not be evaluated due to pressure from family or financial circumstance or believe that patient is burden on society. From there it would be a short step to involuntary euthanasia, where death is forced upon people who understand the circumstance and do not want to die. This practice may permit even the most limited forms …show more content…

129)In this extreme form it is surely groundless, given the values that prevail in our society. As Ezekiel Emanuel puts it, “Euthanasia and assisted suicide are socially disastrous. They are not containable by placing legal limits on their practice. Arguments to the contrary, the slippery slope is an inescapable, logical, psychological, historical and empirical reality” (Emanuel, 1997, Physician-Assisted Suicide section, para. 2). However, we cannot deny the truth that the family of a patient hope for assisted death because they love him, and wish that he didn’t have to suffer from the disease. Moreover, the families who have witnessed a family member’s death in severe agony already suffer a sense of despair and powerlessness. Additionally, should the care for patients with a terminal illness be allowed to bankrupt families or cause severe …show more content…

However, to prolong the patients’ lives without the possibility of revival is just to inflict the pain. If such a delayed time means the prolongation of pain, the prolongation just leads to obstructing the dignity of human, and to depriving the right to choose death. Euthanasia is an extremely difficult moral decision that should be made along with doctors and their families (Campbell & Cox, 2010, p. 56). Moreover, one of the ironies of modern medicine is that it extends our life spans enormously, and reduces early death. The extended period is including the dying process. It is not homicide. It just allows the patient to die when the life span has properly finished. Many patients fear that they will be kept alive with pain by modern medicines. On that account, when people face up to death, they should have the right to control their fates, including the right to

Show More
Related
1170 Words | 5 Pages

In addition, Williams states that this “policy is a slippery slope” for non-voluntary euthanasia and others may decide for the patient what they think is best, even when the patient does not have a say. William strongly believes that “the dangers of euthanasia are too great to all run the risk of approving it in any form” (William

Read More
677 Words | 3 Pages

Patients can end their suffering quicker and will not have to go through a long, painful death. It speeds up the process of death, shortening the patients’ suffering. In “Introduction to Physician-Assisted Suicide: At Issue”, Ondrey writes, “Advocates of physician-assisted suicide argue that this progress has not only lengthened the lives of terminally

Read More
266 Words | 2 Pages

Physician assisted suicide has brought up intense moral controversy on whether it is right or wrong. In the article, “Assisted Suicide: A Right or a Wrong?,” Claire Andre and Manuel Velasquez, one side argues that a person should have the choice to end their own life, to end their prolonged suffering and pain if one desires. According to Andre and Velasquez, medicine and technology has allowed people to live longer lives, but also has allowed people to suffer longer too. To deny one’s pleas to end their life and continue one’s suffering is seen as inhumane yet, the opposing side argues the value of life, and the horrible effects that legalizing assisted suicide may cause.

Read More
509 Words | 3 Pages

Doctors control the means, drugs that end life painlessly” (Jaret). Doctors hold the key, to end patients suffering it should be legal for doctors to help patients and patients should also have the right to make a decision that has to do with ending their life. According to Issues and Controversies “The right of a competent, terminally ill person to avoid excruciating pain and embrace a timely and dignified death bears the sanction of history and is implicit in the concept of ordered liberty” (“Right to Die”). Patients have the right as citizens to have a say in the way they want to have a death on their own terms. Nobody should be withholding the right to die from a patient who is mentally competent and terminally ill (“Right to

Read More
1029 Words | 5 Pages

The job of medical professionals is to save lives, and relieve pain, so euthanasia and assisted suicide become a discussion when the only way to relieve pain is by dying. Cancer patients who are on hospice may look into these options. The main argument made with euthanasia is that it will lead to consequences. Having active voluntary euthanasia legalized could eventually legalize active involuntary euthanasia. A consequence of this ethical implication is that physicians and other health providers may become too comfortable with inducing the progress of death.

Read More
1714 Words | 7 Pages

Haley Price Phil 203 12-3-15 Prompt 2 The right to doctor assisted dying is a compelling topic that comes with much debate. The debates that take place go back and forth about whether a patient should have the right to die with assistance of a physician or if this aid in taking one’s life should not be permissible. Some are against it because of moral or religious beliefs, and others are for this type of dying because of the respect and compassion they have towards death. I believe that if a patient is given no chance of survival, and are tired of the countless medications that are only making them more miserable, they have come to terms with their condition and have already said their goodbyes, and death is imminent - time is the only factor

Read More
959 Words | 4 Pages

A competent terminal patient must have the option of assisted suicide because it is in the best interest of that person” (The Right to Assisted Suicide - Lonestar College Education). Multiple patients all around the world face severe pain, pain which medications and drugs cannot cure and heal. As time goes on, this patient will face unbearable pain and it must be in their best interest to attempt and try to indulge in physician-assisted suicide. This will give patients the right to end their own life if what they are facing is too big of an issue for them to handle.

Read More
703 Words | 3 Pages

Fear that assisted suicide may be used to end people’s lives when a miracle recovery is right around the corner, or cut someone’s life short when they aren’t ready to die. But legalising euthanasia doesn’t mean it becomes a free for all. Part of the suggested law involves a framework that doctors MUST follow to regulate euthanasia. This means that in order for someone to be given ‘euthanasia’, two seperate doctors must agree that the illness is in fact incurable, and the patient must be mentally stable enough to give honest and genuine consent. With such laws in place, we can ensure the safety and protection of patients without forcing them to miserable suffer while they await their natural

Read More
110 Words | 1 Pages

The argument of ending life being a slippery slope can be dispelled to a certain degree when it comes to ethical reasoning. Proponents see assisted suicide as a risk to the elderly and uninsured who may feel compelled to request assistance to end life to avoid being a burden to family and or society (Ersek,2004, table 2). Protocol can and would be in place that would assure measures are taken to those seeking to die on their own terms can do so. This choice is done freely without consequence to themselves or by the doctors assisting by determining factors that would safeguard against abuse of the choice to end

Read More
1461 Words | 6 Pages

For the terminally ill the decision of ending their lives with compassion should be a fundamental right, a personal

Read More
560 Words | 3 Pages

The ability to freely choose one’s own death if they experience any sort of pain is still an issue revolving around the concept of euthanasia (Benatar, 2011). The notion of freedom is of great importance to many people, where denying someone’s right to life causes restrictions to one’s freedom (Benatar, 2011). The restriction of freedom is followed by the intent of forcing someone to live their life when they don’t want to (Benatar, 2011). “This imposes a terrible burden either on those who are consequently forced to continue living when they would rather die, or on those who defy the law to provide the desired assistance.” (Benatar, 2011).

Read More
873 Words | 4 Pages

Shelby Alexander Professor Tucker English Comp II 5 March 2018 Dying with Dignity Assisted suicide has been a controversial topic in the United States since 1906 (Chronology of Dying). Opposers argue that this is a gateway for abuse of powers and are worried about exploitation in the system. While, supporters argue that this will help end the drawn out suffering of many sick people already facing death.

Read More
1085 Words | 5 Pages

Roshona Perry English 0890 Professor McNally 15 December 2014 Assisted Suicide Assisted suicide for the terminally ill has been a very big issue in today’s society. Some people may think that terminally ill patients should not have the right to ask their doctor to assist them in dying no matter what their condition is. As for other people may think that a patient should be able to ask their doctor to assist them in dying because they should be allowed to choose when and how they want to die. Those who don’t believe that assisted suicide should be legal because they believe that is goes against religious belief and medical ethics.

Read More
771 Words | 4 Pages

Experts debate whether euthanasia should be a legal option for the terminally ill. As advocates say euthanasia should be an option to avoid needless pain, opponents argue that is morally wrong and violates the medical code. Euthanasia is one of the most controversial topics, and it has been a topic of concern among society. “Euthanasia is the act or practice of ending the life of a person suffering from a terminal illness or an incurable condition. Euthanasia differs from assisted suicide in that with euthanasia the doctor can provide and administer the drugs that are used to end a life, whereas with assisted suicide the doctor may only provide the drugs, not administer them”(“Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia Timeline”).

Read More
1731 Words | 7 Pages

Introduction With reference to the question posed, it has been suggested that euthanasia may be defined as “the act of intentionally causing the painless death of a sick person”. In other words, it bears the meaning of a “painless, happy or good death” as derived from the ancient Greek language – “eu”, meaning good; and “thanatos”, meaning death. Due to the rapid advancements in medical treatments, patients are capable of being kept “alive” for indefinite periods of time. Hence, in order to distinguish the ancient concept of allowing a patient to die and neglecting them treatment, the medical community has encompassed the idea of drawing a line between active euthanasia and passive euthanasia .

Read More

More about Assisted Suicide Arguments Against Euthanasia

Related Topics

Open Document