Physician Assisted Suicide has been a controversial topic for centuries. First of all, Physician Assisted Suicide is when someone takes their own life with the help of someone else who supplies the means to do so (Jaret). Some of the people who can contribute to someone taking their own life can be doctors because they have access to the medication that could potentially end their suffering and make death more bearable, which is why this topic is so controversial. Assisted Suicide first appeared publicly in 1958 when a pathologist, Doctor Jack Kevorkian created what he called as a suicide machine. The illegal machine allowed extremely ill patients to self administer lethal doses of drugs. Jack Kevorkian was labeled as “Dr. Death” and put …show more content…
Assisted Suicide means that patients have a right to die. According to an article called Issues and Controversies “When patients reach a point where, illness, pain, suffering and lack of freedom have essentially destroyed their quality of life, they should have the ability to end their lives legally and in a dignified manner”(“Right to Die”). Everybody should be able to have a say over how they want to die especially when they have reached a certain point where they are just suffering and there's a way to end it. In Jaret’s words, “I should have the right to take my life when that seems proper and the best thing to do. Suicide isn't illegal. Doctors control the means, drugs that end life painlessly” (Jaret). Doctors hold the key, to end patients suffering it should be legal for doctors to help patients and patients should also have the right to make a decision that has to do with ending their life. According to Issues and Controversies “The right of a competent, terminally ill person to avoid excruciating pain and embrace a timely and dignified death bears the sanction of history and is implicit in the concept of ordered liberty” (“Right to Die”). Patients have the right as citizens to have a say in the way they want to have a death on their own terms. Nobody should be withholding the right to die from a patient who is mentally competent and terminally ill (“Right to