Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Frisking and racial profiling
Racial discrimination by police
Frisking and racial profiling
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Frisking and racial profiling
Racial discrimination by police
Frisking and racial profiling
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
David Floyd was the lead plaintiff amongst others, Lalit Clarkson, Deon Dennis, and David Ourlicht in the 2013 New York City Police Department (NYPD) Stop and Frisk lawsuit. Floyd claimed that on February 27, 2008, he was walking on the path nearby to his house in the Bronx, New York. He encountered the basement tenant, also an African–American man, locked out of his apartment. Before they could open the door, three NYPD officers approached them and asked the two men what they were doing, told them to stop, and proceeded to frisk them. The officers claimed they had stopped Floyd because they believed Floyd was attempting a burglary.
It occurs everyday in minority communities, when law enforcement make judgement off stereotypes and characteristics. In the article “How the Supreme Court Authorized Racial Profiling” the author claims “The supreme courts first step to sanction racial profiling was Terry vs Ohio, an 8-1 ruling that developed the “reasonable suspicion standard (the stop and frisk rule)”(Guner Olsen). The quote provides evidence to my claim that there’s a law against racial profiling but it still happens in America. Law enforcement is supposed to protect our rights, not violate
The severity of racial profiling is very concerning. As proven by numerous texts studied for this Expository Writing class, it is evident that the Black respondents of Otis Johnson’s poll, analyzing citizens’ relationships with the police, are not the only Black people that: “expressed far less confidence than whites in local police to treat both races equally” (Johnson). In White Privilege: Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack, Peggy McIntosh describes various privileges which sound ordinary, though surprisingly only White people have. Among them, is one that affects all people on a daily basis: “If a traffic cop pulls me over or if the IRS audits my tax return, I can be sure I haven’t been singled out because of my race” (McIntosh). Governmental
In the article “ Jim Crow Policing”, written by Bob Herbert, Herbert writes about the discrimination of young black and Hispanic New Yorkers by the police. This mistreatment of these ethnicity are despicably from cops who are black or Hispanic as well. Statistically from Hispanic, black, and Caucasian, whites are stopped less but usually found with contraband. Than black or Latinos who were frisked for reasons such as having inappropriate attire. Herbert justly believes Jim Crow policies should be abolish.
New York Police Officers feel no commitment in having to treat any black or Hispanic with respect because of their race. The generic debate made by Bob Herbert in his work, Jim Crow Policing, is that stops are a representation of cops being racist and harassers as well. More precisely Herbert feuds that racial profiling has become a tool of harassment. Herbert states, “Rather than a legitimate crime-fighting tool, these stops are a despicable racially oriented tool of harassment”(NY Times Herbert). In the passage, Herbert is specifying that blacks and Hispanics were commonly stopped and frisked for their race.
As with any criminal case, there are always a number of issues pertaining the stages of the crime and also the media and the general public’s opinion of the case. Many of the issues and explicit actions of certain individuals that had happened during the Corryn Rayney case had affected the interpretation of the case in someway for both government workers and the general public. By analysing the issues of the case, it allows a much more detailed view on the case and how most of the issues are linked in one way or another. One of the issues regarding this case was where a police officer had been found attempting to pressure forensic pathologists to alter their case reports to align with their best interests.
He uses being charged with marching without a permit as an example. However, this rule becomes unfair when it is selectively applied
The police were overusing this tactic to aggressively made police stops. Data shows that stop-and-frisk was getting extremely worse and the number of police stops that was being conducted is due to racial profiling. After a successful campaign, new legislations were introduce that will have an inspector to oversee NYPD and would allow citizens to sue the
The act of “Stop and Frisk” began in the early 1900’s when crime rates began to escalate in major cities such as New York, Chicago, and Philadelphia. Stop, question, and frisk, or SQF, is an urban policing measure that involves the large-scale deployment of officers in public spaces (e.g., sidewalks, alleys, the communal outdoor spaces of public housing) tasked with conducting frequent investigative stops (Huq, A. Z. (2017). In the articles provided, it is questioned whether New York’s stop and frisk policy is constitutional or not. I agree with the court's ruling, I believe Judge Scheindlin seemed too involved. “Judge Shira A. Scheindlin, the appeals court said, jeopardized "the appearance of partiality ... by a series of media interviews and public statements purporting to respond publicly to criticism of the District Court”
"Racial Profiling and Criminal Justice." The Journal of Ethics, vol. 15, no. 1-2, 2011. , pp. 79-88. Nclive, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10892-010-9098-3.
As citizens of America, we are taught to believe that we are going to be protected by the police and the constitution. In reality the police that are on beat and the courts are finding ways to violate our constitutional rights. Police are finding ways to violate our fourth amendment rights in such ways that makes civilians second guessing whether they are here to serve and protect or just to meet a certain quota. Stop and frisk was implemented to stop the crimes that are on the streets but, instead they are causing racial profiling by the police to African Americans and Latinos. The police are over using and abusing “Stop and Frisk” so they can make arrest and to put fear into young adult’s life.
Not to mention all the undocumented people that feel oppressed by officers and scared to talk back to them with a “no”. In chapter two, the author presents a section titled Just Say No. In this section the author illustrates a time where two police officers stopped a bus to search for drugs. Police officers never warned individuals that they had the right to remain silent and, therefore, minorities were trapped and found guilty for carrying drugs. In addition, the book discusses the Florida vs Botsick case that states that people have the right to refuse answering the police.
I think if a parent wants to bake an officer a cake for saving her son from drowning then it is her way of showing appreciation in the way that she knows how to show her thankfulness. I do not think that officers should be allowed to accept bribes to turn their heads in a situation. The claim that has become more often declared against police is the false arrest. The person bringing the complaint assert that the police officers are in violation of the Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable search and seizure. If an officer has reason to think that the individual had committed a crime, then the arrest is within reasonable limitations, and the Fourth Amendment has not become violated.
Have you ever been a victim to racial profiling of some sort? If so it’s probably because you are a minority or person of color. Today, federal agencies are racial profiling and being unconstitutional to society today. Racial profiling is stopping someone because the color of their skin or having suspicion in criminal activity. The iron triangle is trying to get something knew added to the government or wanting to keep a policy the same or make changes to the policy.
Racial Profiling in America Racial profiling is defined as refers to the targeting of particular individuals by law enforcement authorities based not their behavior, but rather their personal characteristics ( The Leadership conference) . This is another mechanism for racial discrimination backed by the law. According to the The Leadership conference, racial discrimination is not solely on race, but based on religion, ethnicity and national origin.