Andrew Carnegie's Laissez-Faire: Robber Barons

744 Words3 Pages

Laissez-faire was a policy followed by the U.S. government that entailed the government could not take part in the affairs of businesses. Many entrepreneurs and businessmen, during the 19th century, took advantage of this, to its fullest extent. One of these men was Andrew Carnegie; an influential, wealthy businessman who became a prominent monopolist of the steel industry. However, contrary to popular belief, he was a robber baron, in that he became rich through unscrupulous acts. Carnegie exercised immoral business practices that included giving low wages to employees, lack of empathy towards his employees , and his deceitful nature. Every business depends on its employees and workers, without them there would be no mass quantities of the product, or …show more content…

One example of this unethical way of business, was his way of acquiring “Allegheny Steel Company.” The company was beginning to become quite the competitor, using a new method that allowed the efficient, and effective production of steel. The company’s new method was so successful, they were able to undercut Carnegie’s own prices. However, Carnegie began spreading false rumors of the steel being manufactured by Allegheny Steel Company, implying it was ineffective, spreading alarm to their buyers. He was able to hurt their company and take the the reins. Once Carnegie had acquired the company, he declared that the process that was being used was efficient, and would save the company both time and money without compromising the quality of the steel, contrary to his prior rumors. Carnegie spread lies about a company that was prospering, and earning more profits than him, for the reason of hurting their business and acquiring their methods. This completely loathsome, deceitful business practices is nothing short of immoral, and depicts Carnegie as a robber